Jump to content

alprod

New Signing
  • Posts

    86
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by alprod

  1. 3-5-2 for me also. I think it is the best way to maximize our advantage against poorer quality oppositions, we should be able to mop the floor with them using 3-5-2
  2. Doesnt exist anymore, myself and a few others set it up about 5 years ago, never got off the ground really. I dont live in brissel any more, there are still plenty if bears down there but nothing official
  3. Are you joking or just daft??? Your original comment was: "The £30m was never dependent on a cva, he quite clearly said it would be in our account come July. There was NO stipulations." You have quoted an incomplete sentence to defend your claim, the full sentence is actually: "By the end of July, we will have £30m-plus in the bank from the share issue". So it is quite clear that there is a stipulation and that the 30m was dependant on a share issue. You deliberately missed out the end of the sentence to suit your own argument. The share issue has obviously not taken place yet. Some other quotes from the source you referenced to ridicule your argument that there were no stipulations are: "By the end of the cooling off period we will have then raised another £30m, that's two years season-ticket sales." - the cooling off period Mr Green is referring to, is the 28 days after CVA is accepted (and obviously it was not accepted). "Let's assume CVA goes ahead. Any money that comes in between the approval and the cooling off period (28 days from Thursday) is all ring-fenced." - Here is Mr Green explaining what the cooling off period is. “Some of the people don't want to play ball if it's newco, some are happy either way - Mr green talking about his consortium prior to the CVA decision. So he is saying that some investors are not interested if we do not get a CVA (which obviously means less money invested) I think this proves beyond all doubt, that your original statement was wrong, that you tried to defend your statement by editing and misquoting Mr Green's comments to suit your agenda and that you are clearly....... A DAFTY!
  4. Lol, could you provide the actual quote where he said this, think you'll be looking a while, see if any your chums over on ff can help you out finding it.
  5. Only a taig would come out with a statement like that!
  6. I remember years ago a guy on the plane home from porto singing john grieg knows my farther, my father knows john grieg, pretty much all the way back
  7. I know ffs, it's not like the new rangers board have been run off their feet or anything trying to get the newco up and running, dealing with the sfa/spl pish, managing season ticket sales, managing new merchandising deal etc... they really need to get their priorities straight
  8. Any reason why you think so badly of Charlie? Can't see what he's done wrong myself, in fact since he's taken over and secured our SFA license he has been a great ambassador for the club.
  9. Not really, the difference is that Green had a genuine credible business plan and raised money to invest in the club when it mattered. Brown had nothing more than a naive vision, there was no substance to Brown's plan at all, he banded about fans owning the club but had no genuine, structured or realistic plan to achieve that. He appeared to think it was as simple as fans giving him their season ticket money instead and then he would have enough to buy it. He was so out of his league and didn't appear to understand anything about high level finance. You would prefere Bomber, who doesn't have a clue about, finance and running a football club to be in charge? The guy can hardly articulate a sentence. He had a personal axe to grind with Green and put Rangers future at risk with his actions, disgusting behaviour for a "rangers legend"...and dont get me started on the fact he tried to buy the club with a bunch of tims...
  10. He was seen asking his millionaire pal McKenna for a loan of his rosary BEADS!
  11. I saw him out furniture shopping the other day, he said "I got ma sofa oot eh REIDS!"
  12. "pertinent questions"...AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! All he did was throw unfounded allegations around, caused huge divisions in the fans, led a campaign to starve the club risking it's existence and stole some old boys season ticket money
  13. Could anyone post link to this, want to send it to someone, cheers
  14. He was probably talking to him about the merchandising deal for SportsDirect. There was another thread with info that we have ditched JJB for SportsDirect.
  15. That's a good point. Could we start a campaign to find out how much was raised and how much has been paid back? I think we are entitled to the transparency that Bomber (ironically) was demanding of Green. Could some FF members get the ball rolling over there and watch them go into meltdown (or you'll just get banned)
  16. Be interesting if the Sun did a follow up story on the old guy and asked him if he got his money back.
  17. Do you think he's asked for it back yet? They should have interviewed him as part of the video rangers posted yesterday with everyone happy to be renewing their season tickets...cut to the old guy sitting in his house with no season ticket and no money! SHOWS THE DEEDS!
  18. Can someone give the OP a double face palm please
  19. But bomber brown told us not to buy season tickets??? I might see if I can get the old boys seat from the sun that gave his money to brown for cheap.
  20. You seem too by the tone of your response. Lighten up, great resource to share with other bears, Its absolutely great for winding them up
  21. I'm sure a lot of you are aware of this site, but it's an excellent resource for ammunition against the great unwashed. The blogger puts some amount of work into keeping this up to date, well done that man! http://ifyouknowtheirhistory.blogspot.co.uk/
  22. Touch a nerve with the priest analogy did I? lol, job done! http://ifyouknowtheirhistory.blogspot.co.uk/ What's your favourite bit of history from this site?
  23. There is no debate that the club remains however the Company and Company name have changed. The history of the club remains no matter what the company is called and I think its irrelevant whether or not the SFA recognise our history as it still exists. Take this example, imagine a priest or celtic boys club employee was convicted of abuse (hard to imagine I know), if that person then decided to change his name his history doesn't just disappear, his past doesn't just dissapear. He is still a beast with history of abuse although he now calls himself a different name. History cannot be changed, that is why is is called history, we won all our titles fair and square, our history remains, no matter who says it doesn't! Celtics history of covering up for beasts will also always remain, that is their legacy.
×
×
  • Create New...