glesgabear81

fuck... here come his boyfriends.

pricks like you

Dam right, neg reps will make it all go away.

mental

The btc does matter because like it or not, it will have a bearing on the dual contract investigation. The notion that david "the ego" murray has sat on a positive btc result for weeks is nonsensical. There is zero chance he (or his media pals) would sit on this, a positive result would vindicate his tenure in his eyes. If I had to put money on it I'd say btc has gone against murray and oldco.

I think if the BTC goes against the oldco it would make a negative outcome on the dual contract investigation more likely.

whyte said he gave personal and corporate guarantees to ticketus to the tune of 27 million. He said he was the only person at risk (financially). The fact whyte said this means he is lying or telling a half truth imo, I don't think the bbc asked him anything about it which doesn't surprise me at all.

I seem to remember the original SPA between murray and whyte made it crystal clear that murray and his "people" would be handling everything about BTC. I suppose thats betweeen murray and D&P now but the point remains that murray made sure he still pulled the strings re the BTC after the initial sale.

I take it the bbc interviewer never asked whyte to clarify "personal and corporate guarantees" when referring to the the ticketus money. whyte said he was the only person at risk financially (27 million), I'd love to know what those guarantees were.

That says the LBG debt was assigned to wavetower, it says nothing about paying it off as a condition of the sale. I don't see how he used season ticket money to purchase the club if the purchase price was a pound. whyte said he gave personal and corporate guarantees to ticketus, did he have anything to say on that last night? I would love it if he was jailed but imo he can say he bought the club fair and square for a pound and as soon as he handed it over he was perfectly entitled to use ticketus to raise capital. (probably been answered by D&P already but I'm sure a couple of million of that ticketus money went missing).

I thought he bought the club for a pound and used the ticketus money to pay LBG. In that scenario the rat can say he was entitled to do what he wanted after he paid the pound because he officially owned the club. That much has gone on I might be mistaken, maybe paying off Lloyds was a condition of the sale.

If some SPL clubs are so reliant on Rangers fans turning up at their grounds once or twice a season then thats their problem. Unless the mood of the support mellows an there is no boycott in the future then those clubs will just have to get used to it. The extra 150k they all get might help them enough to see out the season then they will try to get a fairer share of the prize money next season (and probably get it because they will have the 11-1 vote). I haven't heard or read a thing about the new sky deal so don't know how much they will be sharing. .

Has anyone (Bears Den, media, spl or club chairmen) attempted to quantify the loss of revenue to the SPL clubs this season without Rangers? Has anyone compared SPL teams attendances with last seasons to see if our absence has had any effect? I suppose each club would be different especially top/bottom six but it would be interesting to see how much financial damage has been done. (I'm sure I read each club gets a share of £1.5 million this season because of them in CL, that would take some of the sting out of their hurt).

tabloid wanna be.

I don't think much of the HMRC statement tbh, it doesn't help me one way or the other on whether or not sfa/uefa will recognise the continuity of the club. (never heard of a British law that covers it). Re: the sfa and conditional membership, I don't remember hearing or reading confirmation from the SFA, that they accept we are the same club, if there is then thats a huge relief. If you mean the act of transferring the membership in itself is confirmation then maybe/hopefully your right, the other side of that argument is the conditions were attached to the membership itself and any club getting said membership would have to take on the conditions that came with it. As I said earlier the nimmo statement is the most promising by far, that makes me much more confident that the SFA will do the right thing, that will ensure UEFA follow suit. Talked the issue to death now, I'm nowhere near as worried as I was so I'll leave it at that.