scottyc06 6,902 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Judge declares SFA had no right to give Rangers transfer embargo! Decision passed packed to Appeals panel to come up with adequate punishment! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHAMPS4LIFE 86 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 deal or no deal .... squeaky bum time Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
3Proddie1690 132 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Will be given at 3:30pm today!RINOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Arrives at 3:31pm! hehe sorry couldn't resist itHopefully its good news tho, between that and CVA things look like their getting better Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queens 11 127 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 I'm not confident Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 I hear the decision is widely expected to be a ruling that they don't have the right to enforce this ban which bats it back to the SFA....whether that will be good or bad news in the end remains to be seen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugh dallas 29 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Not so confident either but heres hoping! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 RM will know the outcome before ssn Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_Cradle85 3 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Not confident at all.Part of me just wants it all to be over. Take this 'punishment' and get on with the CVA and everything else. Hate this shit dragging out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Im sure the decision is that it will be sent back to SFA trubunal if judge agrees with us but SFA want it sent to appeals panel if we win.Cara Sulieman@carasuliemanThe other discussion centred around what would happen if the judge agreed with #Rangers.Expand Cara Sulieman@carasulieman#Rangers argued it should go back to start and be sent to SFA tribunal. SFA want them to send it back to appeal tribunal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fantana 28,894 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 alternatively the SFA could be hoping that their decision is overruled because the writings on the wall for them with regard to boycotts etc. should the embargo stand.they must be seen to punish Rangers by the others but if they are overruled by a court then there's not a lot they can do and this way they aren't shown to be backing down. this is chess, not checkers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
graeme_4 34,001 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Makes for a looooooong afternoon in work! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 For clarification if the court rules in Rangers favour it doesn't lift the ban it means the SFa have to review there punishment again.We are also still banned from signing players while in administration so everyone should calm down... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newryboy 2 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 I hear the decision is widely expected to be a ruling that they don't have the right to enforce this ban which bats it back to the SFA....whether that will be good or bad news in the end remains to be seen.my thoughts also, think we will win, but win what ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toby 6 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 For clarification if the court rules in Rangers favour it doesn't lift the ban it means the SFa have to review there punishment again.We are also still banned from signing players while in administration so everyone should calm down... So in essence, they can 'make' the sfa look at their decision, but they could just stick with their original verdict? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 alternatively the SFA could be hoping that their decision is overruled because the writings on the wall for them with regard to boycotts etc. should the embargo stand.they must be seen to punish Rangers by the others but if they are overruled by a court then there's not a lot they can do and this way they aren't shown to be backing down. this is chess, not checkers. I think if judge agrees with us, the embargo will be lifted (after we exit admin though) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 I think if judge agrees with us, the embargo will be lifted (after we exit admin though)you are incorrect, the judge has already said if he rules in favour of Rangers it goes back to the SFA to give a punsihment they are legally allowed to give, he will not quash the ban. How the SFA will react to this is currently unknown. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyc06 6,902 Posted May 29, 2012 Author Share Posted May 29, 2012 you are incorrect, the judge has already said if he rules in favour of Rangers it goes back to the SFA to give a punsihment they are legally allowed to give, he will not quash the ban. How the SFA will react to this is currently unknown.Well surely if the judge is telling them they have to apply a punishment they are legally allowed to, and the transfer embargo is not one available to them then it would have to be removed?! What they change it to is something else! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaRangerz 4 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Get the embargo tae fuck and get Rino signed.Fuck the tims. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Well surely if the judge is telling them they have to apply a punishment they are legally allowed to, and the transfer embargo is not one available to them then it would have to be removed?! What they change it to is something else!As i say lets see how it turns out. The ony certainty is if we win the ball is back in the SFA's court, the ban isn't magically quashed...the judge has made that clear. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Get the embargo tae fuck and get Rino signed.Fuck the tims.HmmmmmmmmWe can't sign anyone , we are in administration. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaRangerz 4 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 HmmmmmmmmWe can't sign anyone , we are in administration.Sign him on amateur forms or something? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SC1312 153 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Get the embargo tae fuck and get Rino signed.Fuck the tims.Taig. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaRangerz 4 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Taig.Bolt ya rocket. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,548 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Decision from who? The court of session? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 HmmmmmmmmWe can't sign anyone , we are in administration.Rules are made to be broken (*See Italian football, seasons 1948-through-2012.....etc) Yours, Don Corleone Bacon Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.