Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Mr Struth

Why did Charles Green lie

56 posts in this topic

When Charlie Green said he'd done a deal with HMRC, what kinda shite was he smoking. He made that statement and now it has been noted as being nonsense.

This guy has sneaked in the back door and will get us for £5.5m. There is no way he/consortium will stick around if it's Division 3.

These are CWs guys/plans all along.

I propose that when the CVA is rejected. We must all unite and look to acquire the club for £5.5m between us somehow.

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's a pawn in whytes overall game the prick get him to fuck time for us to follow portsmouths lead fan buy out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if he said any of that, but after him stating he was only going to be about for a short time I'm not so sure.

It would have been okay had the CVA been accepted, but right now we need stability and not being passed from pillar to post.

I'm not sure what other option we have or if new bids can be accepted for a Newco.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Warning signs were all there for all to see with Green ..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was raging at the time and was shot down on here for saying so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck knows what the real story is, maybe Green wanted Newco from the start. Maybe he believed HMRC would cut a deal, point is we are where we are and right now i dont need any 'told you so' from TBK or anyone else Not directed at OP just pissed off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HMRC or their liquidators will prevent the sale of any assets that do not comply with their view, an asset sale could be a long way off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to be constructive not I Told You So. Green is not the bad guy, yet. But focus is certainly raised now, that is for fucking sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This hasn't been mentioned yet but Craig Whyte struck a deal to sell his shares to Charles Green on condition he got a CVA, Green wasn't succesful in getting the CVA so that leaves Green in no man's land with no deal for the shares..so how the fuck can he buy the assets when he doesn't own the shares?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What did he actually say about a deal with HMRC ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anybody buy rangers liquidation co now or does it have to be green????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This hasn't been mentioned yet but Craig Whyte struck a deal to sell his shares to Charles Green on condition he got a CVA, Green wasn't succesful in getting the CVA so that leaves Green in no man's land with no deal for the shares..so how the fuck can he buy the assets when he doesn't own the shares?

The shares are defunct now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This hasn't been mentioned yet but Craig Whyte struck a deal to sell his shares to Charles Green on condition he got a CVA, Green wasn't succesful in getting the CVA so that leaves Green in no man's land with no deal for the shares..so how the fuck can he buy the assets when he doesn't own the shares?

He does not need the shares to go the Newco route

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This hasn't been mentioned yet but Craig Whyte struck a deal to sell his shares to Charles Green on condition he got a CVA, Green wasn't succesful in getting the CVA so that leaves Green in no man's land with no deal for the shares..so how the fuck can he buy the assets when he doesn't own the shares?

You only need to buy the shares if you want to do a CVA and keep the existing company. The administrators can sell the assets to a newco without the shares.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the TBK push starting again ?

It was HMRC sunk the CVA not Charles Green. HMRC have stated quite categorically they would have vetoed ANY CVA Rangers put forward.

The rushing to blame Green for it is really quite disgraceful.

We're yet again seeing folk chuck in Whytes name to try and muddy the waters against Green.

I've yet to see anyone come up with any tangible link between Whyte and Green. It's just more TBK scaremongering.

Those cunts will be rejoicing almost as much as the taigs. :anguish:

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

:lol:

Cloud Cuckoo land

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This hasn't been mentioned yet but Craig Whyte struck a deal to sell his shares to Charles Green on condition he got a CVA, Green wasn't succesful in getting the CVA so that leaves Green in no man's land with no deal for the shares..so how the fuck can he buy the assets when he doesn't own the shares?

He doesn't need to buy Greens shares in a Newco situation!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

Aye IF ma aunty had baws she'd huv been ma uncle....... tbk -- lots of talk but fuk all money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

I presume that is a p1ss take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

You are either on the wind up or a complete idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

explain please - what would have made TBK's CVA proposal any more acceptable than Charles Greens? (before you answer bear in mind that TBK's proposal was even LESS than Greens).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the TBK push starting again ?

It was HMRC sunk the CVA not Charles Green. HMRC have stated quite categorically they would have vetoed ANY CVA Rangers put forward.

The rushing to blame Green for it is really quite disgraceful.

We're yet again seeing folk chuck in Whytes name to try and muddy the waters against Green.

I've yet to see anyone come up with any tangible link between Whyte and Green. It's just more TBK scaremongering.

Those cunts will be rejoicing almost as much as the taigs. :anguish:

I repped you for this post - fking negative but spot on - we must give Green a chance - and frankly he is the only show in town!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

Aye.....cos HMRC would have accepted a lesser offer than the one they just rejected if it was Blue Knights CVA................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If HMRC rejected Greens CVA imagine how TBKs offer would of gone down, i would be able to hear the tax man laughing all the way down here if that were the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0