CG in Dock again

[islandblue 366]

They are now beyond pathetic

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

Good - It keeps these issues in the public domain - gives Green another opportunity to fight his corner and he is a combative type - SFA are playing a blinder ... for us!

[dummiesoot 16,005]

At no point did our charles question anyones integrity last week.

[iang2911 423]

At no point did our charles question anyones integrity last week.

You are correct but heDID question the integrity of the commission, that is what he is being charged with!!

[nugegz 4]

Gentlemen,

If we disagree.....then we support Mr C.Green.......we have no need to wring hands..........bosman rule paved the way for free speech especially when we meet such obstacles.......Whom is Glasgow Rangers Q.C.......we have no job to worry.........

[We Will Follow Rangers 12,920]

that gall of these cunts. do they expect us to quietly accept their kangeroo court or their self serving cabal to the benefit of one club.

is it not enough for them that they have been handed on a plate the spl and all its financial rewards for the next 4 - 5 years? fur ra sporting integrity an that.

Mr Green's got them rattled, they know they've got a battle on their hands to try and take our titles, do they imagine a call up before rhegans storm stroopers will shut Mr Green up?

IT BETTER NOT.

Go on, get intae them Charlie

[BigBadDavidson 9]

Rip them a new one Charles!!!

[TheBluenose1972 1,405]

Is it not about time another protest was held at Hampden?

And some fans wonder why we dont support the SFA's football team.

[Edmiston Drive 3,846]

Gentlemen,

If we disagree.....then we support Mr C.Green.......we have no need to wring hands..........bosman rule paved the way for free speech especially when we meet such obstacles.......Whom is Glasgow Rangers Q.C.......we have no job to worry.........

Are you leggo bud

[ray 105]

Why are the sfa getting involved in a dispute with an autonomous body, which Charlie has made it quite clear he believes has no authority over us at all, time to administer the "coup de grace" Charlie, you know it makes sense..use it.

[crabbit bear 139]

[quote name='californiadreamin52' timestamp='1347977822' post='1060455046

Rule 71: A recognised football body, club, official, Team Official, other member of Team Staff, player or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall, at all times, act in the best interests of Association Football. Furthermore, such person or body shall not act in any manner which is improper or use any one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour.

So when they kicked us down to SFL3, fined us, made us lose most of our players for just about nothing, blackmailed us over our license, put an unlawful transfer embargo on us, stole our prize money, the Steven Davis transfer money, our money from UEFA, stole our Sky Sports tv deal, threatened the SFL clubs with their vote, and god knows what else theyre still going to do, this was "at all times acting in the best interests of Association Football". Because Ive never heard one person say this was good for Scottish Association Football.

And theyve got the cheek to charge CG, this is a fucking joke.

[iang2911 423]

So when they kicked us down to SFL3, fined us, made us lose most of our players for just about nothing, blackmailed us over our license, put an unlawful transfer embargo on us, stole our prize money, the Steven Davis transfer money, our money from UEFA, stole our Sky Sports tv deal, threatened the SFL clubs with their vote, and god knows what else theyre still going to do, this was "at all times acting in the best interests of Association Football". Because Ive never heard one person say this was good for Scottish Association Football.

And theyve got the cheek to charge CG, this is a fucking joke.

Sums it up rather nicely...and if you don't mind I will nick it for use elsewhere/when etc..

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

Why are the sfa getting involved in a dispute with an autonomous body, which Charlie has made it quite clear he believes has no authority over us at all, time to administer the "coup de grace" Charlie, you know it makes sense..use it.

You mean time to wheel out the Joker in the form of the big fat blustering cilise wearing lawyer from Harper McLeod?

[Gillete 1,338]

yet there will still be a few on here who can't wait to line these scumbags pockets at the next Scotland game

corrupt to the core

it's about time the supporters groups got together and we did something positive about this and back Charles Green 100%

Exactly

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

I must make it clear that we are not questioning for a moment the integrity of Lord Nimmo Smith and his colleagues but we believe the SPL have been hypocritical in their approach to this matter. Quite apart from their negotiations with our consortium, I know the SPL were well advanced in their discussions with another bidder and his representatives where EBT issues were raised and there was again an understanding that the EBT issue could be dealt with by agreement if new owners were to take over at Ibrox.

seems the SFA are liars

Of course they are liars - several SFL chairmen called them liars in public

Strangely none of them seemed to have been summonsed for it

Wonder why

[MrSifter 181]

It seems only RFC are not allowed to voice an opinion in the Scottish game.

Green at no stage questioned the panel's integrity. He questioned the forces behind the panel.

I hope he appoints a QC to represent him at this hearing.

[The_Blue_Flash 390]

The reason they let him off last time, is that they CANT PROVE that it is not BIGOTRY in the way they have treated Rangers, there were no real footballing reasons, all this sporting intergrity pish is a joke.

Now to do it again, we took them to a court outwith the sfa and they said the transfer ban was illegal but we still have taken it????

[Allanger 625]

This is beyond a joke now.I would have thought they had more on their plate than going after CG.Bastards every one of them

[Ger_onimo 20,488]

The reason they let him off last time, is that they CANT PROVE that it is not BIGOTRY in the way they have treated Rangers, there were no real footballing reasons, all this sporting intergrity pish is a joke.

Now to do it again, we took them to a court outwith the sfa and they said the transfer ban was illegal but we still have taken it????

Because they blackmailed us into accepting it. Not illegal but morally bankrupt. Scum.

[boss 1,941]

The SFA are clearly frightened of CG and what he is doing to them and to their pals at the SPL, hence they are trying to cut him down. It wont work and will only make CG all the more determined that truth and right will prevail.

[The_Blue_Flash 390]

The only thing that matters to them, the only thing that is important forget every other issue, is to give us fines, to charges everyone associated with rangers of bringing the game into disrepute and they are spitting venom every single day they couldnt get rid of them.

[Ger_onimo 20,488]

This is beyond a joke now.I would have thought they had more on their plate than going after CG.Bastards every one of them

All they have on their plate is a doomed organisation which is sustained only by an insatiable bloodlust for the biggest and best football club on the world. Not for long though.

[Gandalf the Blue 1,384]

They really do hate Charlie. He just wont go away.

Ride right through them, they dont have the stomach for this fight.

[Alwaysblue 709]

Why are the sfa getting involved in a dispute with an autonomous body, which Charlie has made it quite clear he believes has no authority over us at all, time to administer the "coup de grace" Charlie, you know it makes sense..use it.

That is my take on it too!

[Guardian 4,281]

They are setting a dangerous precedent here.

They can't do Charlie for this after Lemmon and many other managers got away with it.

If they do, the show their colours once again and will have to do the same with every outburst from other teams.

Lennon got away with the following.

Celtic manager Neil Lennon will face three SFA charges over his reaction to the William Hill Scottish Cup semi-final defeat by Hearts (SFL3 feeder club).

Lennon has been issued with a notice of complaint accusing him of breaching three SFA rules relating to Hearts (SFL3 feeder club)' 2-1 victory at Hampden, which came courtesy of Craig Beattie's controversial late penalty.

Lennon, who was hit with a two-match touchline ban last week over a separate incident, has seven days to respond with an SFA hearing pencilled in for May 10.

Lennon has been hit with a misconduct charge, which relates to offences including aggressive behaviour and insulting language towards a match official.

The Celtic manager ran on to the Hampden pitch to confront referee Euan Norris over the penalty award, which came when a Marius Zaliukas shot hit the arm of Joe Ledley and then brushed against Victor Wanyama.

Celtic were then denied a penalty when the ball struck Hearts (SFL3 feeder club) defender Andy Webster.

Lennon has also been hit with two charges relating to comments made on Twitter.

The Hoops boss, who did not conduct any post-match interviews, tweeted soon after the game: 'Referee told players he thought Wanyama handled...feel so sorry for players and fans..I think it's personal myself.'

He then re-tweeted a comment from a Celtic supporter which suggested the club 'pack our bags and get out of this league that is run by crooked SFA officials'.

The online comments will see him face two charges, including an alleged breach of rule 68 which forbids criticism of match officials in a way that indicates bias or incompetence or impinges on his character.

Frustrated: Lennon also watched his Celtic side lose to Kilmarnock at Hampden in the League Cup final

Frustrated: Lennon also watched his Celtic side lose to Kilmarnock at Hampden in the League Cup final

The rule specifically includes comments made on a 'social networking or micro-blogging site'.

Lennon is also accused of breaching rule 71 by not acting in the best interests of football or acting in an improper manner.

Lennon is halfway through his touchline ban for breaching rule 68 by accusing referee Willie Collum of a 'criminal' decision not to give his team a late penalty in their previous trip to Hampden, a 1-0 defeat by Kilmarnock in the Scottish Communities League Cup final last month.

The Irishman received no further punishment after being hit with a misconduct charge relating to his clash with match officials at Ibrox, which saw him sent from the dugout halfway through Celtic's 3-2 Clydesdale Bank Premier League defeat by Rangers.

The SFA's compliance officer, Vincent Lunny, also wrote to the Celtic manager asking him to explain comments made after the Rangers game about hoping for a decent referee performance against St Johnstone the following weekend, although there are suggestions that matter may be dropped.