Poll: Paul Murray, Yes or No?

[boss 1,941]

No abuse, just a simple aye or nay will do.

[fog 289]

Nope.

[elephants stoned 2,994]

Not a chance in hell

Edit: no abuse, see OP.

[bombaybadboy08 15,660]

Are you prepared to negotiate with regards to abuse?

[Johnnyren 601]

Yes

[simplythebest 11,453]

Never.

[Neil60 1]

No

[Essandoh 21,207]

No.

Also, I note your regards to no abuse, but in completely hypothetical terms one could come to the conclusion that Paul Murray is a {edit }

[laudrupno1 3,932]

No!!

[kanjo 26,328]

had his chance. Nope.

[larky76 4]

No

[Jonok 1,245]

yes

[Smile 26,600]

No had his chance and waited too long yet kept on manipulating the support through the media.

[Bears r us 30,794]

NO

[wearethepeople1 3,897]

Dunno what the fuck to think anymore.

A few hours ago I was excited for the new season to start, now all this pish has got my stomach in knots again

[Blue and True 311]

oh dear I may be in some bother with this.

But hear me out.

I voted YES

And here is why.

Paul Murray in this instance and in my opinion is only a front.

We all know he does not have the cash to back up a move to the board.

But someone does and that someone wants PM on the board.

I also believe the time has come for a major shareholder to take us on say 30% holding.

This is what I believe is behind todays ongoingd

The move today also sees a fantastic business man in Blin also muted with a position which I also feel would be good.

If this was simply a PM Blue Knights re hash I would have said no. But I have a feeling this time its the real deal.

[Dennis 1,011]

Unsure.

[Dunny_01 2,007]

no nae never

[eosmhdo 1,879]

Abuse, but quietly

[Helicopter Sundae 5,986]

Is this a secret ballot?

I don't want to get picketed if I vote the wrong way.

[gogzy 31,195]

no.

[boss 1,941]

Is this a secret ballot?

I don't want to get picketed if I vote the wrong way.

I made it private, not public, so not even I can see how someone votes.

[j1mgg 3,766]

Had his chance and blew it, twice. One with the "I just found £20m down the back of the couch" and the second time with the blue knights.

[reallyruff 622]

oh dear I may be in some bother with this.

But hear me out.

I voted YES

And here is why.

Paul Murray in this instance and in my opinion is only a front.

We all know he does not have the cash to back up a move to the board.

But someone does and that someone wants PM on the board.

I also believe the time has come for a major shareholder to take us on say 30% holding.

This is what I believe is behind todays ongoingd

The move today also sees a fantastic business man in Blin also muted with a position which I also feel would be good.

If this was simply a PM Blue Knights re hash I would have said no. But I have a feeling this time its the real deal.

Any real deal shouldn't need PM to be a front for it if it wants to be taken seriously by a support that ridicules PM on a regular basis, and with good cause.

So it's no way Jose or me.

[offshoreworker 204]

pure and simple NAW