Ferdasyn 431 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Does this imply what I think it does?Accused of betting against his own team.The Compliance Officer has issued the following Notice of Complaint: Alleged Party in Breach: Ian Black, Rangers FCDates: 4th March 2006 to 28th July 2013Disciplinary Rule(s) allegedly breached:Disciplinary Rule 22 (Season 2012/13 and preceding Rules and Articles):(1) By betting on three football matches on then-registered club not to win.(2) By betting on a further 10 football matches that involved then-registered club.(3) By betting on a further 147 football matches. Principal Hearing Date: Thursday, 12th September 2013Mr Black has until Monday 26th August 2013 to respond to the complaint.Disciplinary Rule 22 (Rule 33 in updated Judicial Panel Protocol for season 2013/14):No club, official, Team Official or other member of Team Staff, player, match official or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall bet in any way on a football match (except authorised and registered football pools).Please note that there is no evidence to suggest any breach of Disciplinary Rule 23 (Rule 34 in updated Judicial Panel Protocol for season 2013/14).Disciplinary Rule 23, for reference: No club, official, Team Official, other member of Team Staff, player, match official or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall knowingly behave in a manner, during or in connection with a match in which the party has participated or has any influence, either direct or indirect, which could give rise to an event in which they or any third party benefits financially through betting. http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish_fa_news.cfm?page=2565&newsCategoryID=1&newsID=12361 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,142 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Unbelievable Jeff.It never rains but it pours.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speuan 1 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Where did this come from? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theiconicman 2,947 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Honestly, nothing surprises me anymore. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtmuir 3 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Oh shit. Doesn't sound good. Dates from 2006 to 2013 which is just ridiculous, if it is true then why did it take them so long to figure that one out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senna 735 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 From 2006-2013 is a long time, and he's obviously not been with us for all of that time. This doesn't look great though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdasyn 431 Posted August 19, 2013 Author Share Posted August 19, 2013 Where did this come from?SFA Website. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speuan 1 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 SFA Website.Awesome. Things were just looking up for him! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Is it defo betting against his team? apparently it's just as frowned upon to bet that your team will win tooNow breaking on Sky Sports News btw Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronniemca 479 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Remind me what the odds were against Forfar . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 As if there isn't enough going on. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGM_72 3,534 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Will await the outcome of this before condemning him.Doesn't look good though. Dare I say it might explain sub-par performances too?Hope it isn't true, though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperLeeMcCulloch 2,313 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Is it defo betting against his team? apparently it's just as frowned upon to bet that your team will win tooNow breaking on Sky Sports News btwCan't remember who it was but last week someone in England was done with this as well and it showed you the rules, something like if a player bet on or against his current team or former teams they will be in breach of it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Just before Timmy gets all excited and accuses him of matchfixing;Please note that there is no evidence to suggest any breach of Disciplinary Rule 23 (Rule 34 in updated Judicial Panel Protocol for season 2013/14).Disciplinary Rule 23, for reference: No club, official, Team Official, other member of Team Staff, player, match official or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall knowingly behave in a manner, during or in connection with a match in which the party has participated or has any influence, either direct or indirect, which could give rise to an event in which they or any third party benefits financially through betting Carsons Dog, BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT and Phil 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueoutthedome 87 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Nearly 7 years the SFA are on the ball Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueoutthedome 87 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Nearly 7 years the SFA are on the ball Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbert 416 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Alison Robbie @AlisonRobbie5m#Rangers Ian Black issued with a notice of complaint by #SFA - accused of betting against his own team Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Will await the outcome of this before condemning him.Doesn't look good though. Dare I say it might explain sub-par performances too?Hope it isn't true, though.Why would it explain subpar performances? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,430 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Just when he started to resemble a footballer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Interesting bit that jumps out being "no evidence to suggest it" ... hmmm something doesn't add up Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 I won't be judging until there's an outcome to it all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 He's been charged Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Smiley 494 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Good grief. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Fuck knows anymore, its just one thing after another. Shows how much Black rated us last seasonApparently he did this at Hertz and ICT too if the dates are. Right fuck knows what it means other than he doesn't understand betting rules for sportsmen very well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 How can you be charged with something there's no evidence for? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.