Jump to content

Notice of Complaint Issued to Ian Black


Ferdasyn

Recommended Posts

He has breached rule 22, but there is no evidence to suggest he has breached the other rule which involves actions to determine the outcome of a match - such as making wayward passes often, scoring own goals etc - to produce a beneficial result for himself or a third party.

It's not difficult to understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would expect a statement from the club rather than the player on this. If there is any basis would possibly expect the club to suspend him in meantime. I'll wait until the facts are clearer but its just another awful situation we could do without..

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can you be charged with something there's no evidence for?

Fuck knows how they can even let it go 7 year though :lol:

However online betting sites share details of bets with FA's etc if they believe there's an irregularity. So it could be his online betting site has alerted them.

However I don't know if it was online or in the bookies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would expect a statement on this from the club rather than the player on this. If there is any basis would possibly expect the club to suspend him in meantime. I'll wait until the facts are clearer but its just another awful situation we could do without..

I'd Imagine he will be suspended pending an investigation. Hopefully it's not true, if so what a fanny

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a bit murky this whole betting thing in football! Townsend and jerome have both been fined recently with it so they must be trying to clamp down....if it transpires this happened years ago then questions will need to be asked why they have waited until now to do anything about it but as others have said we will need to wait and get the facts first!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can you be charged with something there's no evidence for?

He's not been. Read the thing.

Hes been charged with betting on matches he was involved in and also 147 others.

There is no evidence to suggest Black has intentionally influenced a game to benefit through betting. ie hes not deliberately played shite to win a bet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not been. Read the thing.

Hes been charged with betting on matches he was involved in and also 147 others.

There is no evidence to suggest Black has intentionally influenced a game to benefit through betting. ie hes not deliberately played shite to win a bet.

Greatly frowned upon regardless of whether they're intentionally throwing games or not.
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a bit murky this whole betting thing in football! Townsend and jerome have both been fined recently with it so they must be trying to clamp down....if it transpires this happened years ago then questions will need to be asked why they have waited until now to do anything about it but as others have said we will need to wait and get the facts first!

Jerome didn't bet against his own club though. Seems that is the accusation, which is surely illegal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not been. Read the thing.

Hes been charged with betting on matches he was involved in and also 147 others.

There is no evidence to suggest Black has intentionally influenced a game to benefit through betting. ie hes not deliberately played shite to win a bet.

Not a case of reading the thing as you say - it's difficult for me to understand what the rules etc mean. Someone else cleared it up anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...