Broxi1872 183 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitre_mouldmaster 21,509 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Cant make out the text, but if the evidence is there to back up this claim, it undoes all that goodwill Wallace earned today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 When do you even hear of another club responding so quickly to the aspirations of another club? I can't wait to win the SPL and put that manky lennon bastard in his place - the gutter. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue68 2,497 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 More than likely there will be quotes from the UOF whilst the rangers support is in mourning. NIce timing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutchy 1,200 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 I can only enlarge the first part. "Graham Wallace is on the ropes for claiming calls for ST boycott is reason for ST purchase credit". Or words to that effect. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bydo 3,211 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Basically the record are saying they have seen evidence that a merchant called 'first data' said that they wanted security over ST sales BEFORE King started talk of a boycott. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamFyfe 1,438 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 The headlines should be in memory of Sandy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
4MenHadADream 122 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 It's basically saying that the Record have seen documents from our payment processor, stating that they have had doubts about us since January, and that it's not a just consequence of King/UoF ticket boycott threat Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRoyalBlueShirt 140 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Cant make out the text, but if the evidence is there to back up this claim, it undoes all that goodwill Wallace earned today.Just newspapers mate one piece of advice - don't believe everything you read. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM1872 3,706 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Due just packing it all in. No longer worth it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitre_mouldmaster 21,509 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 When do you even hear of another club responding so quickly to the aspirations of another club?I can't wait to win the SPL and put that manky lennon bastard in his place - the gutter.To be fair he was asked by a reporter in a press conference, and he didnt say anything too unreasonable for once. Not that I hear anyway. Withhold the right to go back on that though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Hurlock Loyal 12,133 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 More than likely there be quotes from the UOF whilst the rangers support is in mourning. NIce timing.Think the facts are pretty damming against the board and its incumbents. Why stick the boot into UOF, when you haven't read the piece yet. Your timing seems to be off tbh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandabear 15 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Says the company First Data told the club they wanted assurances of full security as early as January 23rd.So if these documents are true we have a CEO who took 4 months to write a 6 page document which made false claims, wherein he lied to and accused the fans. This must be good news for those on here who have lapped up everything he has said and turned on the UoF.No wonder they need a new PR guru. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRoyalBlueShirt 140 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 The headlines should be in memory of Sandy.Yeah bud...you're spot on Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 768 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Can't be arsed looking but did he not say "one major factor"? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,141 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 The headlines should be in memory of Sandy.This a thousand times over but our press have no shame or moral standards and it's actually quite sickening to think how much they hate us. This is more the catholic bigots in press jobs, disgusting behaviour. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue68 2,497 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Think the facts are pretty damming against the board and its incumbents. Why stick the boot into UOF, when you haven't read the piece yet. Your timing seems to be off tbh.You may be right. I am betting there is a quote in there though. As said above it should be about Sandy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Can't be arsed looking but did he not say "one major factor"?Yeah, he did. And I don't see that it is necessarily a lie that it was a major factor. The discussion may have started in January, but that doesn't mean the disruption thereafter wouldn't have made First Data's position more entrenched. This does not make Wallace a liar, although you could present it that way if it suited your aims. It seems to me that many are very, very keen to twist much of what Wallace says. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandabear 15 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Yeah, he did. And I don't see that it is necessarily a lie that it was a major factor. The discussion may have started in January, but that doesn't mean the disruption thereafter wouldn't have made First Data's position more entrenched. This does not make Wallace a liar, although you could present it that way if it suited your aims. It seems to me that many are very, very keen to twist much of what Wallace says.It doesn't make him very honest either. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 It doesn't make him very honest either.Why? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandabear 15 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Why?Well, why did he not share this other information (assuming the DR story is true)? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenose48 951 Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 The Daily Record ---- can't wait to stick the boot into us at any opportunity.The DK disciples on here ------ can't wait to load the present board with the sins of the previous. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenose1975 1,287 Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 Tart it up whatever way you like to U o F, this bear points a big shitty finger firmly at your door. Cannae wait till I get another stupid propaganda leaflet so that too can be rolled up into a wee ball then lobbed squarely at the lemming who gave me it! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 Well, why did he not share this other information (assuming the DR story is true)?What information? The fact that companies involved in matters credit with Rangers would be worried by the financial situation (that he didn't cause)? Isn't that obvious? The point he's making is that DK is a destabilising influence that is not needed at a difficult point. An influence he can try to have some affect on by bringing more attention to its consequences. He has already suggested that he is trying to deal with the other factors fincncial causing the likes of First Data to have concerns. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smidro 13 Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 Should First Data be showing other people information about it's clients?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.