graeme_4 34,363 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 12 hours ago, The Dude said: Aye just seen that, thought it was a 3. Baffled why we signed Gostomski now tbh. Because Bell is pretty injury prone? Foderingham need competition, and not sure they young boys (as talented as they are supposed to be) are realistically pushing for his place. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozblue 4,331 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 3 minutes ago, cumnockbear said: Unless the poster is fishing...... sniff sniff ....... 26 posts in 5 months.......... That is Shifty Eyes form and needs to be monitored,methinks BTW! Where the fuck are the shifties? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 4 minutes ago, graeme_4 said: Because Bell is pretty injury prone? Foderingham need competition, and not sure they young boys (as talented as they are supposed to be) are realistically pushing for his place. Foderingham is the clear number one and, barring injury, Bell or Gostomski won't displace him this season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozblue 4,331 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 9 minutes ago, graeme_4 said: Because Bell is pretty injury prone? Foderingham need competition, and not sure they young boys (as talented as they are supposed to be) are realistically pushing for his place. What the Dude is referring to,graeme is why did we sign Gostomski on a 6 month deal and then put Bell on the subs bench every game since he returned from injury? That doesn't make sense no matter what way you look at it. Maciej Gostomski is ten times the keeper Bell is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cumnockbear 2,446 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 3 minutes ago, Ozblue said: That is Shifty Eyes form and needs to be monitored,methinks BTW! Where the fuck are the shifties? I have no idea but the forum needs new emoticons, these ones are so outdated Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozblue 4,331 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 Just now, cumnockbear said: I have no idea but the forum needs new emoticons, these ones are so outdated I agree Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
graeme_4 34,363 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 1 hour ago, The Dude said: Foderingham is the clear number one and, barring injury, Bell or Gostomski won't displace him this season. He is. Does that mean we shouldn't have a fit back up who can push him? I'd expect him to remain number 1 for the next 5 years - I rate him that highly. However, if he starts 'coasting' due to lack of competition or isn't performing, I'd full expect his place to be under threat (as I would any other). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
graeme_4 34,363 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 1 hour ago, Ozblue said: I agree I disagree. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk and disorderly. 14,332 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 I'd keep Sheils as an impact sub, get rid of law and bring in a midfielder who can actually tackle, and thank Clark for his services. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 5 minutes ago, graeme_4 said: He is. Does that mean we shouldn't have a fit back up who can push him? I'd expect him to remain number 1 for the next 5 years - I rate him that highly. However, if he starts 'coasting' due to lack of competition or isn't performing, I'd full expect his place to be under threat (as I would any other). We've got 2 back ups now. Not to mention McRorie and Kelly. I know it's not the done thing to criticise Warburton but he's fucked up here. If Bell is number 2 then signing Gostomski was totally unneccessary, if Gostomski is then there's no need for Bell and we should have looked to move him on. Worst case scenario if we only had one and both he and Fod got injured we could bring an emergency loan on or use Kelly. He has been good enough to sit in the bench for half the season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRice1872 105 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 1 hour ago, cumnockbear said: I have no idea but the forum needs new emoticons, these ones are so outdated If you look at all the Jambos Kickback emoticons our ones are light years behind mate : ( obviously most of them are good but an update would be amazing Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,601 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 4 minutes ago, TonyRice1872 said: If you look at all the Jambos Kickback emoticons our ones are light years behind mate : ( obviously most of them are good but an update would be amazing wat Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,241 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 1 hour ago, Ozblue said: What the Dude is referring to,graeme is why did we sign Gostomski on a 6 month deal and then put Bell on the subs bench every game since he returned from injury? That doesn't make sense no matter what way you look at it. Maciej Gostomski is ten times the keeper Bell is. Perhaps at the time we signed Gostomski MW didn't know how long it would be before Bell was actually fit enough to take a spot on the bench, or how likely it was there was a recurrence of the shoulder injury. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRice1872 105 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 8 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: wat Just saying mate; they have GIF emoticons of little cartoon men wearing their kit dancing etc - I only read it to see what they all thought of B King being loaned here Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,601 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 7 minutes ago, TonyRice1872 said: Just saying mate; they have GIF emoticons of little cartoon men wearing their kit dancing etc Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 15 minutes ago, Big Al II said: Perhaps at the time we signed Gostomski MW didn't know how long it would be before Bell was actually fit enough to take a spot on the bench, or how likely it was there was a recurrence of the shoulder injury. It was around 13 days from Gostomski signing to Bell appearing on the bench and Gostomski being bombed out. If that was the case it's a damning indictment of our medical staff if they never knew when he'd be fit, although I believe he'd been back in full training a while before he took a place in the match day squad. I agree on the recurrence part, Novo had a helluva trouble with his after dislocating it, but surely if there was a fear Bell was to get reinjured we'd have inserted a recall option in Kelly's loan. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cumnockbear 2,446 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 42 minutes ago, TonyRice1872 said: If you look at all the Jambos Kickback emoticons our ones are light years behind mate : ( obviously most of them are good but an update would be amazing Aye ave seen theres lol few belter on there, wee salt n sauce pricks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,241 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 48 minutes ago, The Dude said: It was around 13 days from Gostomski signing to Bell appearing on the bench and Gostomski being bombed out. If that was the case it's a damning indictment of our medical staff if they never knew when he'd be fit, although I believe he'd been back in full training a while before he took a place in the match day squad. I agree on the recurrence part, Novo had a helluva trouble with his after dislocating it, but surely if there was a fear Bell was to get reinjured we'd have inserted a recall option in Kelly's loan. Sometimes things aren't as black and white as that. It doesn't have to be damning to anyone Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
writingranger 1,412 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 2 hours ago, Ozblue said: What the Dude is referring to,graeme is why did we sign Gostomski on a 6 month deal and then put Bell on the subs bench every game since he returned from injury? That doesn't make sense no matter what way you look at it. Maciej Gostomski is ten times the keeper Bell is. I have it on good authority that he has an unbreakable contract which states that if fit he must sit on the bench. Like Major Major Major in Catch 22 who would only see people in his office when he was out of his office, so Bell will only play when he is injured and when he's fit he must sit on the bench but never come on. Actual answer: I dunno, Maybe it's a shop window thing or maybe he's impressed in training Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 19 minutes ago, Big Al II said: Sometimes things aren't as black and white as that. It doesn't have to be damning to anyone Some things aren't black and white, but you're talking less than a fortnight here. If they never knew Bell would be ready to be on the bench within a few weeks there's something seriously wrong. Especially now that Gostomski and/or Bell will feature for the U20's to maintain match sharpness and limiting opportunities for McRorie or Kelly to play. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,241 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 13 minutes ago, The Dude said: Some things aren't black and white, but you're talking less than a fortnight here. If they never knew Bell would be ready to be on the bench within a few weeks there's something seriously wrong. Especially now that Gostomski and/or Bell will feature for the U20's to maintain match sharpness and limiting opportunities for McRorie or Kelly to play. Wasn't it 6 months before he actually got the op because they waited to see if he could recover without one? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 17 minutes ago, Big Al II said: Wasn't it 6 months before he actually got the op because they waited to see if he could recover without one? Just over a month from the initial injury. http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/bell-shoulder-op-successful/ He then hurt his knee over last summer and underwent surgery on that a few months afterwards after it never responded to treatment with it reported at the time he'd be back by around Xmas. http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/spl/rangers/6705173/No-early-return-for-Cammy.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 So a topic about Law, Shiels & Clark goes to 4 pages, mainly about goalkeepers. How did this come about? It couldn't be down to our resident troll, could it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 3 minutes ago, Corky True Legend said: So a topic about Law, Shiels & Clark goes to 4 pages, mainly about goalkeepers. How did this come about? It couldn't be down to our resident troll, could it? Discussing a players future in a topic about players futures...shock horror. What is it with people like you trying to police every thread? Posting stuff like what you just posted is more derailing than anything in this thread before. You're just trying to start an argument, and you call others trolls. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 16 minutes ago, Corky True Legend said: So a topic about Law, Shiels & Clark goes to 4 pages, mainly about goalkeepers. How did this come about? It couldn't be down to our resident troll, could it? Glad to see your post is on topic Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.