WCPRANGERS1 2,997 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 This would be my team. Wes Tav Keirnan Wilson Wallace Rossiter Barton Kranjcar Windass Waghorn McKay If you then look at how we can change this team then we are in brilliant shape. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKingObv 10,634 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 I'd agree with that In an idea world I'd have a new striker replace Waghorn and a new centre back. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris182 6,279 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 The scary thing is, we've still to see Crooks and potentially two new signings AND the players aren't yet fully match fit. Astounding Can literally smell the fear from the East end Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCPRANGERS1 2,997 Posted July 25, 2016 Author Share Posted July 25, 2016 Just now, TheKingObv said: I'd agree with that In an idea world I'd have a new striker replace Waghorn and a new centre back. We have a really good squad just now but if we add 2 more in those positions we will be in great shape. We must be a nightmare to play against with the rotation and movement we have. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rangers FC 751 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 7 minutes ago, WCPRANGERS1 said: This would be my team. Wes Tav Keirnan Wilson Wallace Rossiter Barton Kranjcar Windass Waghorn McKay If you then look at how we can change this team then we are in brilliant shape. That's a Warbism and a half Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamMunny 3,215 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 To replace Waghorn the striker would have to be top class. Waghorn will get 20 plus at least this season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCPRANGERS1 2,997 Posted July 25, 2016 Author Share Posted July 25, 2016 3 minutes ago, The Rangers FC said: That's a Warbism and a half It's true though... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Huvnae seen Crooks and Windass yet, so couldnae say. Suspect you're not far off the mark though. But it'll probably be horses for courses. We seem to have alot of players that are of a similar level, so i think lots of people will get lots of game time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCPRANGERS1 2,997 Posted July 25, 2016 Author Share Posted July 25, 2016 1 minute ago, Inigo said: Huvnae seen Crooks and Windass yet, so couldnae say. Suspect you're not far off the mark though. But it'll probably be horses for courses. We seem to have alot of players that are of a similar level, so i think lots of people will get lots of game time. That's what I'm saying though mate, "from what I've seen"and that includes Rossiter while playing for England. We actually seem to offer him a lot more freedom and our rotation on the park is brilliant. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VladimirWeiss69 802 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Wouldn't go into the season with that defence. Slot Hill in there and get another quality centreback in, plus a striker then we are good to go! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCRobertson 11,768 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 The team selection is sublime right now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCPRANGERS1 2,997 Posted July 25, 2016 Author Share Posted July 25, 2016 3 minutes ago, VladimirWeiss69 said: Wouldn't go into the season with that defence. Slot Hill in there and get another quality centreback in, plus a striker then we are good to go! I agree with what you say mate in terms of additions but again that's why I'm saying "from what I've seen". Hill I haven't seen enough of yet and tonight I thought we were far better organised and actually looked like we were communicating. We are far stronger this year and if we add 2 more you're right we are in business. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
centenarystand 2,227 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Anyone who would have those 2 centre backs is insane. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDFM 3,809 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Same team as you, if we sign a new striker the I'd have Windass coming off the bench every week for Kranjcar who probably won't have the legs to play 90 every week Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jb85 1,783 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 You can't replace Waghorn. He's like a new signing this season. He's a work horse and he's scoring in every game so far. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,348 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Kiernan and Wilson Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronzy 26,085 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 1 minute ago, ForeverAndEver said: Kiernan and Wallace Wallace? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie0202 12,216 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Same as OP but Hill for Kiernan. Ideally we will sign another centre half but I genuinely think Danny Wilson is going to be a completely different player for us this season in a good way. Hasn't done much wrong so far in the few early season games but he's noticably more comfortable on the ball than Rob Kiernan. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,348 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 12 minutes ago, Bronzy said: Wallace? Fuck need to edit. Mongo of a boy Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brubear 2,905 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 My concern would be if Barton and Kranjcar can compliment each other or is it going to be difficult to play them together, and hence keep them both happy. The quality they both ooze means that MW needs to find a way to make it work. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sco22y 280 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 http://lineupbuilder.com/?sk=by1l5 I would have kranjcar in the centre with both Barton and and Rossiter either side and just behind him. I think it is important that he is given the opportunity to play the final ball to the forward three from this position. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCPRANGERS1 2,997 Posted July 25, 2016 Author Share Posted July 25, 2016 56 minutes ago, centenarystand said: Anyone who would have those 2 centre backs is insane. Like our manager? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_mcv_ 107 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Massive improvement since Warburton has took charge. Still cringe at the thought of the players Ally brought in though Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCPRANGERS1 2,997 Posted July 25, 2016 Author Share Posted July 25, 2016 3 minutes ago, _mcv_ said: Massive improvement since Warburton has took charge. Still cringe at the thought of the players Ally brought in though Honestly......his teams are now irrelevant. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham 3,456 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 33 minutes ago, Brubear said: My concern would be if Barton and Kranjcar can compliment each other or is it going to be difficult to play them together, and hence keep them both happy. The quality they both ooze means that MW needs to find a way to make it work. You could see they work well together tonight, Barton sitting a little deeper and dictating play while kranjcar sits a little further forward looking for the ball to link up to the forwards. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.