JamieD 18,880 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 I am sure we are all keenly awaiting the response of the Guardian's media ethics expert to IPSO's findings today, given what a keen interest he has taken in Scottish football and our club's place within Scotland's power structure. Will the complainant in this case be treated as a champion of the little man, like his man - The Failed Journalist? Watch this space. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieD 18,880 Posted August 26, 2016 Author Share Posted August 26, 2016 That word filter Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearsinbath 95 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 2 chances of that happening - slim & none! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
five stars 1,634 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 5 hours ago, bearsinbath said: 2 chances of that happening - slim & none! Less than that mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianferguson 2,619 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 Do you buy the daily record ? Have a look at yerself !!! Absolutely no excuse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trooblue 1,969 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 Greenslade will be too busy providing hospitality to his close friends and neighbours - the ones he claims not to know very well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluedylan 11,555 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 Greenslade has openly stated albeit after being outed that he is a propagandist Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieD 18,880 Posted August 26, 2016 Author Share Posted August 26, 2016 22 minutes ago, bluedylan said: Greenslade has openly stated albeit after being outed that he is a propagandist He wrote an article the other day about how the press should call dissident republicans "gangsters" instead. I pointed out in the comments section that as 1) a self-appointed media ethics guru and 2) a former propagandist for the gangster organisation IRA/Sinn Fein, he should be declaring his personal interest, given that IRA/Sinn Fein are mortal enemies of the dissident republicans. The comment was deleted within 2 minutes, despite this being a statement of fact which he doesn't deny. "Comment is free" indeed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluedylan 11,555 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 Just now, JamieD said: He wrote an article the other day about how the press should dissident republicans "gangsters" instead. I pointed out in the comments section that as 1) a self-appointed media ethics guru and 2) a former propagandist for the gangster organisation IRA/Sinn Fein, he should be declaring his personal interest, given that IRA/Sinn Fein are mortal enemies of the dissident republicans. The comment was deleted within 2 minutes, despite this being a statement of fact which he doesn't deny. "Comment is free" indeed. I assume this was The Guardian,where columnists these days seem to have a free hand at censoring negative comments. Pravda lives! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtuoso 27,180 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 Another Brit hating, rancid fenian bastard who I wish nothing but a slow, painful death on. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.