Jump to content

A new formation to try

Jimfanciesthedude

By Jimfanciesthedude
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jimfanciesthedude

Jimfanciesthedude 24,450

Posted
Posted

a 3-5-2 would have been much better IMO.

I'd have started templeton before Foster, and not played jig.

........ZAL----DM-----Mohsni

Temps.................................Wallace

.................Black...................

.............Lewis...Law.....

.......Miller..........Boyd........

Have temps and Wallace bombing forward at every chance,

what do we think guys?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Wearethepeople72

Wearethepeople72 1,845

Posted
Posted

Meh. We tried a system with three at the back pre-season and against Hibs in our first competitive match, and it didn't really work out very well.

4-4-2 is the best formation with our current squad, IMO.

Templeton at RWB wouldn't work either IMO. He wouldn't be able to do the defensive side of the game. Until we sign a RB who can attack and defend (similar to Lee Wallace at LB), I'd stick with a back four.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jimfanciesthedude

Jimfanciesthedude 24,450

Posted
  • Author
Posted

"Temps" at RWB?

That's just the start!

He isn't there to defend, he is there to push forward. If we need to defend then Black drops back and One of the CB covers the RB position. I tried to set out a very attacking formation, I don't intend that formation to be doing too much defending.

I'd prefer a real right full back to be signed for this position, but I guess it's gonna be foster. I was struggling for someone to put in that role tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites
NixonRFC

NixonRFC 1,305

Posted
Posted

He isn't there to defend, he is there to push forward. If we need to defend then Black drops back and One of the CB covers the RB position. I tried to set out a very attacking formation, I don't intend that formation to be doing too much defending.

I'd prefer a real right full back to be signed for this position, but I guess it's gonna be foster. I was struggling for someone to put in that role tbh.

Thats a baffling statement to make mate, "he isn't there to defend"....what exactly is a RWB's first priority? Its to defend, why would you rather a real full back if that position isn't there to defend? Theres a difference between putting your best team on the park and your most talented 11 which is what I believe you have tried to do here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jimfanciesthedude

Jimfanciesthedude 24,450

Posted
  • Author
Posted

how long can i keep this up :lol:

ah fuck it, fill yer boots lads and lassies, this is by our very own esteemed "Marvin" who has as much knowledge of the game as a fucking teaspoon

http://forum.rangers...ng back&st=560

He tried something different but got the personel all wrong. I disagree with those saying we played 5 at the back. We played closer to a 3 at the back with 2 pushing full backs who tried to get forward all the time. I just think he got the players all wrong, and tried to do a 3-5-1-1

a 3-5-2 would have been much better IMO.

I'd have started templeton before Foster, and not played jig.

........ZAL----DM-----Mohsni

Temps.................................Wallace

.................Black...................

.............Lewis...Law.....

.......Miller..........Boyd........

Have temps and Wallace bombing forward at every chance,

http://forum.rangers...ng back&st=600

He isn't there to defend, he is there to push forward. If we need to defend then Black drops back and One of the CB covers the RB position. I tried to set out a very attacking formation, I don't intend that formation to be doing too much defending.

I'd prefer a real right full back to be signed for this position, but I guess it's gonna be foster. I was struggling for someone to put in that role tbh.

and that ladies and gentleman is that

goodnight, godbless and be sure to tip your waitress

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...