Jimfanciesthedude 24,495 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 a 3-5-2 would have been much better IMO.I'd have started templeton before Foster, and not played jig.........ZAL----DM-----MohsniTemps.................................Wallace.................Black................................Lewis...Law............Miller..........Boyd........Have temps and Wallace bombing forward at every chance,what do we think guys? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wearethepeople72 1,845 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Meh. We tried a system with three at the back pre-season and against Hibs in our first competitive match, and it didn't really work out very well.4-4-2 is the best formation with our current squad, IMO.Templeton at RWB wouldn't work either IMO. He wouldn't be able to do the defensive side of the game. Until we sign a RB who can attack and defend (similar to Lee Wallace at LB), I'd stick with a back four. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clemdog 39,389 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Tried 3 at the back and all the CB's looked clueless. I wouldn't complicate things under McCoist & Co as their genuine coaching ability is clearly rotten. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,102 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 I don't think our players are good enough to play anything other than 442 - they even struggle with that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoorie 1,088 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 "Temps" at RWB?That's just the start! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Football Manager stuff.Our centrebacks showed preseason/at times this season that they aren't intelligent enough to play anything other than a flat four. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyson1872 2,923 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 If were to be 3 at the back I'd haveFaure-Zal-McGregorMcAusland and Wallace as wing backsBlack just in front of the centre halvesMacleod in the centreTemps/Law/Aird just behind the strikersMiller-Boyd Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moody Blue Legend 61,387 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Genius! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,495 Posted October 20, 2014 Author Share Posted October 20, 2014 "Temps" at RWB?That's just the start!He isn't there to defend, he is there to push forward. If we need to defend then Black drops back and One of the CB covers the RB position. I tried to set out a very attacking formation, I don't intend that formation to be doing too much defending. I'd prefer a real right full back to be signed for this position, but I guess it's gonna be foster. I was struggling for someone to put in that role tbh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk and disorderly. 14,325 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 I'd play a goalkeeper too.Or are we to assume that's where Jig is playing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,495 Posted October 20, 2014 Author Share Posted October 20, 2014 wingers can be cracking wingbacks, Davie Cooper is the best left wingback we ever had Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Ffs, Gogzy, rein in your gimp. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,495 Posted October 20, 2014 Author Share Posted October 20, 2014 Ffs, Gogzy, rein in your gimp.he wont answer you, he's not found an unsecured wifi anywhere yet Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,851 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 We just won a game, let's not go mucking it about! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieG54 812 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 We just won a game, let's not go mucking it about!Grow some balls Ally Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NixonRFC 1,309 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 He isn't there to defend, he is there to push forward. If we need to defend then Black drops back and One of the CB covers the RB position. I tried to set out a very attacking formation, I don't intend that formation to be doing too much defending. I'd prefer a real right full back to be signed for this position, but I guess it's gonna be foster. I was struggling for someone to put in that role tbh.Thats a baffling statement to make mate, "he isn't there to defend"....what exactly is a RWB's first priority? Its to defend, why would you rather a real full back if that position isn't there to defend? Theres a difference between putting your best team on the park and your most talented 11 which is what I believe you have tried to do here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weejoseph 2,773 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Lol. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,851 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Grow some balls Ally Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,495 Posted October 20, 2014 Author Share Posted October 20, 2014 how long can i keep this up ah fuck it, fill yer boots lads and lassies, this is by our very own esteemed "Marvin" who has as much knowledge of the game as a fucking teaspoonhttp://forum.rangers...ng back&st=560He tried something different but got the personel all wrong. I disagree with those saying we played 5 at the back. We played closer to a 3 at the back with 2 pushing full backs who tried to get forward all the time. I just think he got the players all wrong, and tried to do a 3-5-1-1a 3-5-2 would have been much better IMO.I'd have started templeton before Foster, and not played jig.........ZAL----DM-----MohsniTemps.................................Wallace.................Black................................Lewis...Law............Miller..........Boyd........Have temps and Wallace bombing forward at every chance,http://forum.rangers...ng back&st=600He isn't there to defend, he is there to push forward. If we need to defend then Black drops back and One of the CB covers the RB position. I tried to set out a very attacking formation, I don't intend that formation to be doing too much defending. I'd prefer a real right full back to be signed for this position, but I guess it's gonna be foster. I was struggling for someone to put in that role tbh.and that ladies and gentleman is thatgoodnight, godbless and be sure to tip your waitress Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lutonblue 1,974 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Why you trippin' Jim? You know you his bottom bitch. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,495 Posted October 20, 2014 Author Share Posted October 20, 2014 Why you trippin' Jim? You know you his bottom bitch.havent you got an ally poster to wank over son Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 havent you got an ally poster to wank over sonWho needs a poster... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.