gogzy 31,195 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Why dont the 50 of you buy your own memberships and have 50 says in any votes from rf, instead of 1 vote from a combined "rm" membership.You get 50 times more say in any vote. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LochendBilly 8,410 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Count me in tae Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,241 Posted February 13, 2015 Author Share Posted February 13, 2015 Why dont the 50 of you buy your own memberships and have 50 says in any votes from rf, instead of 1 vote from a combined "rm" membership.You get 50 times more say in any vote.Most of us do have our own memberships Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Most of us do have our own membershipsThen what is the benefit of RM adding one more vote, that needs to be split between 50 people.the logisitcs of it are crazy.What if a vote happens, and 25 vote one way and 25 vote the other? which side gets to use the "rm" vote?Personally I see this ( if done with RM's name attached) as us breaking our a-political stance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlearyEyedBear 4,148 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Why dont the 50 of you buy your own memberships and have 50 says in any votes from rf, instead of 1 vote from a combined "rm" membership.You get 50 times more say in any vote.Better still, buy your own shares and have an even bigger say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,241 Posted February 13, 2015 Author Share Posted February 13, 2015 Then what is the benefit of RM adding one more vote, that needs to be split between 50 people.the logisitcs of it are crazy.What if a vote happens, and 25 vote one way and 25 vote the other? which side gets to use the "rm" vote?Personally I see this ( if done with RM's name attached) as us breaking our a-political stance.The benefit is another £500 to the club. No need for RM name, it's already been shown you guys have an issue with it. I completely disagree they are political. However I can't be bothered arguing the point, the decision has been made and I respect it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
offshoreworker 204 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Then what is the benefit of RM adding one more vote, that needs to be split between 50 people.the logisitcs of it are crazy.What if a vote happens, and 25 vote one way and 25 vote the other? which side gets to use the "rm" vote?Personally I see this ( if done with RM's name attached) as us breaking our a-political stance.Then what is the benefit of RM adding one more vote, that needs to be split between 50 people.the logisitcs of it are crazy.What if a vote happens, and 25 vote one way and 25 vote the other? which side gets to use the "rm" vote?Personally I see this ( if done with RM's name attached) as us breaking our a-political stance.am in count me as 51 do i get the casting vote Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 am in count me as 51 do i get the casting vote Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Then what is the benefit of RM adding one more vote, that needs to be split between 50 people.the logisitcs of it are crazy.What if a vote happens, and 25 vote one way and 25 vote the other? which side gets to use the "rm" vote?Personally I see this ( if done with RM's name attached) as us breaking our a-political stance.The benefit has nothing to do with increasing how much influence each member has in how RangersFirst votes, it's about getting more money into RangersFirst, and thus more shares under fan ownership. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lutonblue 1,974 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 In Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Why dont the 50 of you buy your own memberships and have 50 says in any votes from rf, instead of 1 vote from a combined "rm" membership.You get 50 times more say in any vote.£500 of shares saying the same thing has more influence than 50 £10 blocks of shares saying 50 different things. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
billtjw 20 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Count me in, Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,804 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 I'll be chairman, and in-turn have casting vote..Those in favour say aye.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 I know RM won't arrange a collection for an 1872 RF Life Membearship and I understand the reasons, although don't entirely agree, RF are not political IMO. However that is irrelevant.The point of this is to gauge interest from RM members in making a donation of say £10 from 50 RM members so we can buy our own RF £500 Life Membearship. I already give monthly, and hope soon to get my own Life Membership (once I finally get my shares cash).However I'm happy to donate £10, anyone else?In true GovanBlue style;Big Al II Rfc52STEPPS BOYgmcfJules WinnfieldstuvahrbrThe New Eraex-guardsmenB18721873bearFalkirk bearWee BudCourtyard BearThe Duderfc_watpcruixrangerbluesteelphilDuntocherLoyal I've signed up for the tenner a month.Would have easily have paid for the lifetime one but had my fingers burned so to speak with the 714 shares I have .Ive sent my proxy for these shares to RF for the upcoming EGM Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Why dont the 50 of you buy your own memberships and have 50 says in any votes from rf, instead of 1 vote from a combined "rm" membership.You get 50 times more say in any vote. I think a unified vote is more beneficial .It will certainly have to be in few weeks time Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Then what is the benefit of RM adding one more vote, that needs to be split between 50 people.the logisitcs of it are crazy.What if a vote happens, and 25 vote one way and 25 vote the other? which side gets to use the "rm" vote?Personally I see this ( if done with RM's name attached) as us breaking our a-political stance.Stick to the non political stance .It keeps us all out the mud slinging with the fans group bullshit Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1963 900 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 I'll chip in Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebluedoo 2,652 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 I am in big Al II Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lutonblue 1,974 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 I'll be chairman, and in-turn have casting vote..Those in favour say aye....aye , as long as you don't have rfc52 vice chairman Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 Why dont the 50 of you buy your own memberships and have 50 says in any votes from rf, instead of 1 vote from a combined "rm" membership.You get 50 times more say in any vote.I already have one mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
don logan 8,057 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 I'm in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paisleyroad 894 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 i'm in Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clemdog 39,389 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 I'm in! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.