Jump to content
  1. Rangers

    1. Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

      55 times the Champions of Scottish Football.

      6m
      posts
    2. Bus & RSC Info

      Leaving times for Supporters Busses, Contact Information and more...

      4.2k
      posts
  2. General

    1. Politics & Current Affairs

      Discuss the more serious world issues.

      430.9k
      posts
    2. General Football & Sport

      Everything in the sports world that is non-Rangers related.

      1.2m
      posts
    3. Gaming

      Discuss the latest in video gaming

      187.9k
      posts
    4. Betting & Gambling

      Post your coupons, tips, offers, boasts, etc.

      61.2k
      posts
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      64,314
    • Most Online
      14,009

    Newest Member
    EllonLoyal
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      243.4k
    • Total Posts
      10.3m
  • Posts

    • How much money is an acceptable expenditure on the women’s team? ”Fuckin’ none.” (There- I said it so people don’t need to reply saying it). In all seriousness though, I’ve said it many times before- I would be absolutely stunned if the whole women’s team cost the club more than it does to keep Goldson and the rest of the dead-wood hangers on for a month, and I know which I would rather have. As others have rightfully said, the women’s team and game will only get better if the club put their money where their mouth is. Failure to invest means it gets more shite, and interest dwindles, which means even less investment, etc etc. For what it’s worth, I actually do like keeping myself informed in how well the team is doing and get frustrated at the fact we seem to have gone down a hill recently in terms of form, but given that’s exactly what happened to the men’s team, I don’t think we can point to the comparatively small amount of investment as the issue.
    • I just saw this and, oh my word. For anyone who hasn’t seen it… Both our keepers are very very poor and always have been.
    • You just make the defenders 'line' 5cm thick.  If the attackers line is beyond it then he's offside.  If it lands within the 5cm line then he's on by a margin of computer error.   (5cm was the example given by the poster above btw, I think half of that (2.5cm = 1 inch) is enough. I'd also make offsides apply to feet-on-the-floor only (which seems to be the case with encroachment as I recently learned).   This was a disallowed goal at the world cup by Lauturo Martinez:     His planted foot is a yard onside ffs, it looks like his ear is offside, a brilliantly timed run & finish chalked off for a complete nonsense.
    • Only joking though...😃 lol??
    • Are you talking pish  just now?  I thought it was all the time......😙😇        
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...