Craig53 326 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 WeirWeir Weir Weir WeirWeir Weir Weir WeirWeir WeirA man can dream. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrandSuckMaster 1,775 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Anyone who picked Lee Wallace over Numan is under 20 or blind Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrandSuckMaster 1,775 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 KlosNumanCuellarBougheraHuttonGio Van BBazzaDe BoerPrsoMolsJelavic Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebluedoo 2,652 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Anyone who picked Lee Wallace over Numan is under 20 or blindOr Papac in my opinion Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stafford 163 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Anyone who picked Lee Wallace over Numan is under 20 or blindSame can be said for anyone who hasn't picked Klos Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stafford 163 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Would be hard to pick 11 from this lot would depend on whether it's just how they performed for us, who was the better players, overall performance for us or just within the turn of the century.KlosRicksen/Hutton/Porrini Amoruso/Moore/Weir/Cuellar/Berg/Bougherra/Boumsong/Frank de BoerNumanFerguson/Arteta/Albertz/van Bronckhorst/ReynaRonald de Boer/Mols/Prso/McCann/Lovenkrands/CaniggiaThose CBs.. The only players I would guarantee to be in any 11 from that lot would be Klos, Amoruso, Numan, Ferguson, van Bronckhorst and Ronald de Boer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleFo8 96 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Whats the prise? Waterrous,Porrini, Weir, Boughera, Papac,Novo, Fergie, Albertz, Gio V B Prso MolsIs everyone just letting this slide?What the fuck? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoGeo7 10,502 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 McGregorHutton cuellar amoruso numanRicksen Ferguson van bronckhorstDe boerPrso molsScary the number of players to leave out Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Seriously, people putting Jelavic before mols? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Seriously, people putting Jelavic before mols? Jelavic won us a championship .Mols sadly was finished by 2000 .Good player but could have been more influential if it wasn't for that injury Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeirFleckNRothen 1,789 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Some cunt went for Whittaker at right-back. McGregor, Hutton, Numan, Amoruso, Weir, Ferguson, de Boer, Albertz, van Bronkhorst Jelavic and Prso.Just seen Wallace, as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebluedoo 2,652 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Is everyone letting this slide?What the fuck? I know, I was just trying to be different, he was an excellent shot stopper and had a tash like a porn star Would have been McGreggor with hindsight Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stafford 163 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Seriously is there people that actually think McGregor was better than Klos? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Anyone who picked Lee Wallace over Numan is under 20 or blindSasa Papac would be miles ahead of Wallace aswell. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Some cunt went for Whittaker at right-back. McGregor, Hutton, Numan, Amoruso, Weir, Ferguson, de Boer, Albertz, van Bronkhorst Jelavic and Prso.Just seen Wallace, as well. I did, some obviously forget how average to pish Hutton was pre-Walter Smith. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_1 1,136 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I did, some obviously forget how average to pish Hutton was pre-Walter Smith.Agree and I think you're forgetting how much of a bombscare Whittaker was for the most part.He'd be behind Ricksen, Reyna and Porrini for me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_1 1,136 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Seriously is there people that actually think McGregor was better than Klos?Toss up between the two.Personally thought McGregor was better rounded, better kicker of the ball, better at coming for crosses etc. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Agree and I think you're forgetting how much of a bombscare Whittaker was for the most part.He'd be behind Ricksen, Reyna and Porrini for me.Ricksen had one good season at Right back, 2002/03. Other than than that he was ok, when he got moved to midfield, he was a cracking player for us.Whittaker wasn't as bad as made out not a chance, good at going forward and decent at defending. People just have a bad opinion of him because of how he left. But five years, 3 league titles, two Scottish cups, 3 league cups and UEFA Cup final later, he was a decent enough player for us. If Hutton played the way he did the start of the Manchester season in his entire spell at us, he would have been first choice, but I'm not picking someone on 6 months of football. Otherwise Cuellar would have been ahead of Bougherra aswell. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeirFleckNRothen 1,789 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I did, some obviously forget how average to pish Hutton was pre-Walter Smith.I'm not sure if you're trying to be different or controversial, but stop it.This is the 'best' Rangers XI and regardless of whether It was for six days, six months or six years, Alan Hutton was on absolute flames on all fronts until he joined Spurs. Whittaker couldn't even reach those heights on the PlayStation.Hutton aside, I'm still shocked that you've went for Whittaker. He was a fucking bombscare and absolutely unspectacular, barring a goal against Sporting Lisbon. Off the top of my head, I recall him costing us in the Champions League and Europa League in 2011, plus getting sent-off at Parkhead. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I'm not sure if you're trying to be different or controversial, but stop it.This is the 'best' Rangers XI and regardless of whether It was for six days, six months or six years, Alan Hutton was on absolute flames on all fronts until he joined Spurs. Whittaker couldn't even reach those heights on the PlayStation.Hutton aside, I'm still shocked that you've went for Whittaker. He was a fucking bombscare and absolutely unspectacular, barring a goal against Sporting Lisbon. Off the top of my head, I recall him costing us in the Champions League and Europa League in 2011, plus getting sent-off at Parkhead.So going by that notion you just want to pick players from different times. That's like people picking Lovenkrands. 2001-2002. Scored some big goals as well all know, 2005-06, done well in Europe. But inbetween was at times shite. Does that mean I should pick him in those periods when he was amazing? Hutton before Walter Smith was average to pish. 2007, he was different class, have I just to forget the pish before that time? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeirFleckNRothen 1,789 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 So going by that notion you just want to pick players from different times. That's like people picking Lovenkrands. 2001-2002. Scored some big goals as well all know, 2005-06, done well in Europe. But inbetween was at times shite. Does that mean I should pick him in those periods when he was amazing? Hutton before Walter Smith was average to pish. 2007, he was different class, have I just to forget the pish before that time?No, because you wouldn't pick Boyd despite his goals over a prolonged period of time. Again, this is the 'Best' players.I'd also dispute your Hutton comments, pre-Smith's arrival. He performed at nowhere near the standard he did under Smith, but he wasn't "pish". He was a young boy.Regardless of Hutton, I'm still shocked at your Whittaker inclusion. Lovenkrands; understandable. Whittaker; unacceptable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.