Jump to content

Photo

Why did Charles Green lie


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

#21 The Godfather

The Godfather

    Hall Of Famer

  • Club Legend
  • 49,709 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow

Posted 12 June 2012 - 12:20 PM

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

You are either on the wind up or a complete idiot.

#22 Cadman

Cadman

    Ian Durrant

  • First Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 688 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wishaw

Posted 12 June 2012 - 12:48 PM

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

explain please - what would have made TBK's CVA proposal any more acceptable than Charles Greens? (before you answer bear in mind that TBK's proposal was even LESS than Greens).

#23 Bluepeter9

Bluepeter9

    Walter Smith

  • Club Legend
  • 19,644 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Lothian

Posted 12 June 2012 - 12:52 PM

Is this the TBK push starting again ?

It was HMRC sunk the CVA not Charles Green. HMRC have stated quite categorically they would have vetoed ANY CVA Rangers put forward.

The rushing to blame Green for it is really quite disgraceful.

We're yet again seeing folk chuck in Whytes name to try and muddy the waters against Green.

I've yet to see anyone come up with any tangible link between Whyte and Green. It's just more TBK scaremongering.

Those cunts will be rejoicing almost as much as the taigs. :anguish:


I repped you for this post - fking negative but spot on - we must give Green a chance - and frankly he is the only show in town!

#24 brianfantana

brianfantana

    Burt Reynolds

  • Club Legend
  • 13,037 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:everywhere

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:08 PM

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this


Aye.....cos HMRC would have accepted a lesser offer than the one they just rejected if it was Blue Knights CVA................

#25 elephants stoned

elephants stoned

    Brian Laudrup

  • First Team
  • 15,477 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:salford

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:20 PM

If HMRC rejected Greens CVA imagine how TBKs offer would of gone down, i would be able to hear the tax man laughing all the way down here if that were the case.

#26 DaRangerz

DaRangerz

    David Cooper Templeton

  • Reserve Team
  • PipPipPip
  • 42 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cambuslang

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:31 PM

Why don't Rangers fans buy the club for 5.5m instead of Green? We are the biggest club in the world.

#27 Kev

Kev

    Sexiest Male '04,'07,'08,'09,'11

  • Admin
  • 64,735 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East Kilbride

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:34 PM

This hasn't been mentioned yet but Craig Whyte struck a deal to sell his shares to Charles Green on condition he got a CVA, Green wasn't succesful in getting the CVA so that leaves Green in no man's land with no deal for the shares..so how the fuck can he buy the assets when he doesn't own the shares?

The shares for a company that is being liquidated. They are meaningless. He has an agreement to buy the company's assets for 5.5million. That's what matters now.

#28 sprotson11

sprotson11

    Andy Goram

  • First Team
  • 1,623 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Stevenston

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:37 PM

Why don't Rangers fans buy the club for 5.5m instead of Green? We are the biggest club in the world.


In my opinion the RFFF should be looking at this in the background in case the deal with Green is challenged by HMRC.

#29 KingKirk

KingKirk

    Jim Baxter

  • Club Legend
  • 13,049 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:37 PM

I don't think Green lied, am sure he said he had come to a verbal agreement, but was waiting for it in writing..

#30 debear

debear

    Queen Street True Blues

  • First Team
  • 5,085 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Under the Floorboards

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:39 PM

Is this the TBK push starting again ?

It was HMRC sunk the CVA not Charles Green. HMRC have stated quite categorically they would have vetoed ANY CVA Rangers put forward.

The rushing to blame Green for it is really quite disgraceful.

We're yet again seeing folk chuck in Whytes name to try and muddy the waters against Green.

I've yet to see anyone come up with any tangible link between Whyte and Green. It's just more TBK scaremongering.

Those cunts will be rejoicing almost as much as the taigs. :anguish:



Statements like that are just plain stupid.

#31 gersandy

gersandy

    Richard Gough

  • First Team
  • 2,600 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:glasgow

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:49 PM

Green will see it through. At least now we dont have the 70m tax bill hanging over us.

#32 ray

ray

    Richard Gough

  • Banned
  • 2,543 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ferniegair

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:51 PM

charlie will be history in the not to distant future.

#33 Smile

Smile

    Jim Baxter

  • Club Legend
  • 14,937 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:54 PM

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this



Your having a laugh surely.

#34 sassaaaa

sassaaaa

    Terry Butcher

  • First Team
  • 4,084 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:glasgow

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:55 PM

Liquidation was always the only way out of this mess , Murray and Whyte knew it and that was their plan all along .

Now is the time for the real future owner of the club to come out of the wood work............

#35 Smile

Smile

    Jim Baxter

  • Club Legend
  • 14,937 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:56 PM

Statements like that are just plain stupid.


I think he's spot on i went on Gers net today and the gloating from certain posters was unpalatable and added nothing to the debate.

#36 Smile

Smile

    Jim Baxter

  • Club Legend
  • 14,937 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:57 PM

Liquidation was always the only way out of this mess , Murray and Whyte knew it and that was their plan all along .

Now is the time for the real future owner of the club to come out of the wood work............


I think whoever took us over with the big tax bill always hanging over us that would always have been the case.

#37 sassaaaa

sassaaaa

    Terry Butcher

  • First Team
  • 4,084 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:glasgow

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:58 PM

I think whoever took us over with the big tax bill always hanging over us that would always have been the case.


I am certain there a few big players just waiting for this outcome ..........

#38 ger50champ

ger50champ

    Richard Gough

  • Banned
  • 2,210 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow

Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:58 PM

Is this the TBK push starting again ?

It was HMRC sunk the CVA not Charles Green. HMRC have stated quite categorically they would have vetoed ANY CVA Rangers put forward.

The rushing to blame Green for it is really quite disgraceful.

We're yet again seeing folk chuck in Whytes name to try and muddy the waters against Green.

I've yet to see anyone come up with any tangible link between Whyte and Green. It's just more TBK scaremongering.

Those cunts will be rejoicing almost as much as the taigs. :anguish:



thats just stupid talk mate .Seriously i dispair on here sometimes .Slag MD all you want but why would fellow Rangers Fans want that.Have a word with yourself man

#39 Crespie6

Crespie6

    Richard Gough

  • First Team
  • 1,876 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:not sure

Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:00 PM

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this


Hi Gunslinger!! :craphead:

#40 ray

ray

    Richard Gough

  • Banned
  • 2,543 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ferniegair

Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:01 PM

why did charlie lie, that's what him and whytey do for a living, they call it wheeling and dealing with lots of concealing.





MOBILE SITE