55 replies to this topic

[The Godfather]

Alwaysblue, on 12 June 2012 - 12:48 PM, said:

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

You are either on the wind up or a complete idiot.

[Cadman]

Alwaysblue, on 12 June 2012 - 12:48 PM, said:

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

explain please - what would have made TBK's CVA proposal any more acceptable than Charles Greens? (before you answer bear in mind that TBK's proposal was even LESS than Greens).

[Bluepeter9]

Guardian, on 12 June 2012 - 12:31 PM, said:

Is this the TBK push starting again ?

It was HMRC sunk the CVA not Charles Green. HMRC have stated quite categorically they would have vetoed ANY CVA Rangers put forward.

The rushing to blame Green for it is really quite disgraceful.

We're yet again seeing folk chuck in Whytes name to try and muddy the waters against Green.

I've yet to see anyone come up with any tangible link between Whyte and Green. It's just more TBK scaremongering.

Those cunts will be rejoicing almost as much as the taigs.

I repped you for this post - fking negative but spot on - we must give Green a chance - and frankly he is the only show in town!

[brianfantana]

Alwaysblue, on 12 June 2012 - 12:48 PM, said:

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

Aye.....cos HMRC would have accepted a lesser offer than the one they just rejected if it was Blue Knights CVA................

[elephants stoned]

If HMRC rejected Greens CVA imagine how TBKs offer would of gone down, i would be able to hear the tax man laughing all the way down here if that were the case.

[DaRangerz]

Why don't Rangers fans buy the club for £5.5m instead of Green? We are the biggest club in the world.

[Kev]

GLASGOWRFC, on 12 June 2012 - 12:02 PM, said:

This hasn't been mentioned yet but Craig Whyte struck a deal to sell his shares to Charles Green on condition he got a CVA, Green wasn't succesful in getting the CVA so that leaves Green in no man's land with no deal for the shares..so how the fuck can he buy the assets when he doesn't own the shares?

The shares for a company that is being liquidated. They are meaningless. He has an agreement to buy the company's assets for £5.5million. That's what matters now.

[sprotson11]

DaRangerz, on 12 June 2012 - 02:31 PM, said:

Why don't Rangers fans buy the club for £5.5m instead of Green? We are the biggest club in the world.

In my opinion the RFFF should be looking at this in the background in case the deal with Green is challenged by HMRC.

[KingKirk]

I don't think Green lied, am sure he said he had come to a verbal agreement, but was waiting for it in writing..

[debear]

Guardian, on 12 June 2012 - 12:31 PM, said:

Is this the TBK push starting again ?

It was HMRC sunk the CVA not Charles Green. HMRC have stated quite categorically they would have vetoed ANY CVA Rangers put forward.

The rushing to blame Green for it is really quite disgraceful.

We're yet again seeing folk chuck in Whytes name to try and muddy the waters against Green.

I've yet to see anyone come up with any tangible link between Whyte and Green. It's just more TBK scaremongering.

Those cunts will be rejoicing almost as much as the taigs.

Statements like that are just plain stupid.

[gersandy]

Green will see it through. At least now we dont have the £70m tax bill hanging over us.

[ray]

charlie will be history in the not to distant future.

[Smile]

Alwaysblue, on 12 June 2012 - 12:48 PM, said:

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

Your having a laugh surely.

[sassaaaa]

Liquidation was always the only way out of this mess , Murray and Whyte knew it and that was their plan all along .

Now is the time for the real future owner of the club to come out of the wood work............

[Smile]

debear, on 12 June 2012 - 02:39 PM, said:

Statements like that are just plain stupid.

I think he's spot on i went on Gers net today and the gloating from certain posters was unpalatable and added nothing to the debate.

[Smile]

sassaaaa, on 12 June 2012 - 02:55 PM, said:

Liquidation was always the only way out of this mess , Murray and Whyte knew it and that was their plan all along .

Now is the time for the real future owner of the club to come out of the wood work............

I think whoever took us over with the big tax bill always hanging over us that would always have been the case.

[sassaaaa]

Smile, on 12 June 2012 - 02:57 PM, said:

I think whoever took us over with the big tax bill always hanging over us that would always have been the case.

I am certain there a few big players just waiting for this outcome ..........

[ger50champ]

Guardian, on 12 June 2012 - 12:31 PM, said:

Is this the TBK push starting again ?

It was HMRC sunk the CVA not Charles Green. HMRC have stated quite categorically they would have vetoed ANY CVA Rangers put forward.

The rushing to blame Green for it is really quite disgraceful.

We're yet again seeing folk chuck in Whytes name to try and muddy the waters against Green.

I've yet to see anyone come up with any tangible link between Whyte and Green. It's just more TBK scaremongering.

Those cunts will be rejoicing almost as much as the taigs.

thats just stupid talk mate .Seriously i dispair on here sometimes .Slag MD all you want but why would fellow Rangers Fans want that.Have a word with yourself man

[Crespie6]

Alwaysblue, on 12 June 2012 - 12:48 PM, said:

I am quite sure if TBK's CVA had been put forward it would have been accepted by HMRC.

Too many dodgy characters involved in this

Hi Gunslinger!!

[ray]

why did charlie lie, that's what him and whytey do for a living, they call it wheeling and dealing with lots of concealing.