More Rhegan bullshit
#1
Posted 05 July 2012 - 08:59 AM
That is not a decision he can make but he can stop Rangers from having membership of the SFA.
If that were to happen then surely Rangers could then apply to play in England and if we could that would be my ideal scenario.
FUCK YOU RHEGAN.
#2
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:01 AM
How can he possibly come out with that shite
#3
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:02 AM
Der Hammer, on 05 July 2012 - 08:59 AM, said:
That is not a decision he can make but he can stop Rangers from having membership of the SFA.
If that were to happen then surely Rangers could then apply to play in England and if we could that would be my ideal scenario.
FUCK YOU RHEGAN.
#4
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:03 AM
They should have thought about that before allowing the SPL clubs to condemn them all
Excuse me while I now don't give a fuck
#5
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:05 AM
Der Hammer, on 05 July 2012 - 08:59 AM, said:
That is not a decision he can make but he can stop Rangers from having membership of the SFA.
If that were to happen then surely Rangers could then apply to play in England and if we could that would be my ideal scenario.
FUCK YOU RHEGAN.
His entire rant of last night should be handed to the RFFF's very own QC who will gladly rip Regan a new arse in Court.
Bring it on.
#6
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:19 AM
#7
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:28 AM
Published: Thu Jul 5 2012, 10.08AM
Share on twitterTweet thisMore Sharing ServicesMore
Scottish football faces a "slow, lingering death" if newco Rangers start life in the Irn-Bru Third Division, SFA chief executive Stewart Regan claims.
In the immediate aftermath of Scottish Premier League clubs rejecting Charles Green's application for top-flight entry, Regan also made a stark claim that depriving Rangers fans of their team would spark "social unrest".
Regan said: "The only solution for the game now is that Rangers come into the Scottish Football League and they come into it in the First Division. If Rangers were to go anywhere other than the First Division, then there would something in the region of £15.7million worth of losses to the game."
Regan made it clear the SFA could not allow the Ibrox club to start at the bottom, meaning Scottish Football League clubs face the prospect of an SPL2 breakaway if they reject a plan to put them in the First Division.
He added: "For the bigger clubs at the top of the league, that's half their annual distributions. For clubs at the bottom it is basically wiping out their entire distributions, for some of the smaller clubs it's a huge proportion of their annual turnover.
"Even if Rangers end up in the First Division, there is still going to be a £5million loss of income to the SPL clubs. The game is not sustainable so there would be a slow lingering death for the game in Scotland.
"It would then trickle down to the SFL. From our perspective as the governing body, we cannot allow that to happen."
The SFA chief executive also confirmed a real threat to television contracts.
"We have had dialogue with the broadcasters and we understand what the various stakeholders from Sky television, ESPN, Sport Five and a number of the SPL's other commercial partners are likely to do in the event Rangers are not in either of the top two tiers," he said. "It's not pretty.
"That's why we cannot sit back and let that happen without trying to get all parties to accept this is the only solution which can keep the game afloat. Without Old Firm games, the value drops, the overseas deals are almost exclusively about the Old Firm derby and that would go immediately."
But, Sporting integritet Regan you
#8
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:31 AM
TheDadoKnight, on 05 July 2012 - 09:03 AM, said:
They should have thought about that before allowing the SPL clubs to condemn them all
Excuse me while I now don't give a fuck
It really isnt up to Regan its up to the SFL clubs .
Ok once we are accepted to said league we need a licence to play.
If the SFA refuse us that we apply for FA win win.
#9
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:31 AM
I'm just gonnae post this everytime a thread comes up about this dickhead.
#10
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:33 AM
#11
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:33 AM
#12
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:35 AM
#13
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:35 AM
nachothelegend, on 05 July 2012 - 09:31 AM, said:
It really isnt up to Regan its up to the SFL clubs .
Ok once we are accepted to said league we need a licence to play.
If the SFA refuse us that we apply for FA win win.
I am NOT sure of Regans logic (Regan - logic - I am off to a bad start here...)
BUT if we are needed to 'save' Scottish Football - how does REFUSING us a licence help the situation?
Oh and on what grounds is HE (or even THEM) allowed to refuse a licence if the SFL accept us in?
#14
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:36 AM
#15
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:40 AM
Bluepeter9, on 05 July 2012 - 09:35 AM, said:
BUT if we are needed to 'save' Scottish Football - how does REFUSING us a licence help the situation?
Oh and on what grounds is HE (or even THEM) allowed to refuse a licence if the SFL accept us in?
That is what I was thinking.
#17
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:42 AM
Bluepeter9, on 05 July 2012 - 09:35 AM, said:
BUT if we are needed to 'save' Scottish Football - how does REFUSING us a licence help the situation?
Oh and on what grounds is HE (or even THEM) allowed to refuse a licence if the SFL accept us in?
It is bare-faced blackmail and the press should be all over it.
If the SFL clubs cave in to threats of Stewart Regan, I'm finished with Scottish football.
#19
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:45 AM
Bluepeter9, on 05 July 2012 - 09:35 AM, said:
BUT if we are needed to 'save' Scottish Football - how does REFUSING us a licence help the situation?
Oh and on what grounds is HE (or even THEM) allowed to refuse a licence if the SFL accept us in?
Excatly mate he has told that many lies he dosent even know what he's talking about anymore
#20
Posted 05 July 2012 - 09:45 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












