So going back to my original point, how does this represent a bad deal for the club? It frees up money for other signings - common sense in my opinion.
Of course I'm serious. The previous transfer window has been proven to be a shambles. The board backed Pedro to the hilt and now we are where we are. Appreciate that you don't want to bail the board out and like us all we want the best team in the park but I still maintain this is a good deal for a player that has hardly played this season.
So, what's the problem with this deal? You happy that we've spunked more than 3 million on two Mexicans that have played fewer games between them than Murphy will probably play on loan?
Where the shambles with this deal? We've pissed millions against the wall for Pena, Herrera and the rest of the duds Pedro brought in. FFS, the Board do something sensible for a change and your not happy??
That's him. I have remember one game he turned up in a red indian ( ok, native American for the benefit of the easily offended) chief's costume and did a rain dance. Funny as fuck and totally random.
Submitted mine already. The 1872 Ground (Park)
Agree with previous comment regarding naming it after an individual irrespective of the merits at the time.