Jump to content

Bluepeter9

Club Legend
  • Content Count

    24,994
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Bluepeter9 last won the day on May 8 2016

Bluepeter9 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4,579 Excellent

About Bluepeter9

  • Rank
    Don't worry - Be happy

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    West Lothian

Previous Fields

  • Level of Support
    Season ticket holder.

Recent Profile Visitors

8,598 profile views
  1. That "eating of Rangers top", brown sauce or vinegar - oh and was it wrapped in the tabloid you read?
  2. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    No my English is perfectly good - here is an example - my tadger is 5.5 in Long in its fully aroused state ( like when I see pictures of Wee Nicola sturgeon) - that’s a measurable fact - I tell people I have a big dick - that is me giving my opinion on the size of my tadger - and yet the reality is it’s only ( at best) an average size Dick! ( Cue comments about how I am a big dick etc)
  3. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    I agree that there a lot of poor decisions against us - I agree that the SFA are wankers. I would like to see better refereeing and more transparent processes and decision making at the SFA. We ( I think) both agree on those things. Where ( I think) we disagree Is that those bad decisions are some how ‘just becuase’ we are Rangers. I don’t think there is deliberate ( or even unconscious )bias against us. Folk look at those poor decisions and draw a different conclusion to me as to why they happened.
  4. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    Nice rant - hope it helped.
  5. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    Damm - I was trying for patronising!
  6. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    It’s certainly a valid opinion - I don’t agree with your opinion but there is nothing to fault in your presentation of your argument!
  7. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    Try learning to read before trying to have a pop. The moment you interpret a fact - you provide an opinion. Facts are indisputable - measurable. Know many folks on here have very high opinions of themselves and State their opinions as fact and want their opinions treated like fact but the fact is they are only opinions.
  8. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    I’ve already answered that point - and yes it is a fact! Good lad. But any interpretation of that FACT, like is shows bias - is an opinion - my opinion is a few posts back.
  9. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    Sorry but a fact is not open to interpretation - a fact is measurable, repeatedly measurable. ‘I wear specs’ is a fact - ‘i look better in specs’ is an opinion. I know my explaination is kinda simple but your post above demonstrated to me I would need to keep it simple. Orvyou to keep up.
  10. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    I’m ignorong that!
  11. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    ... and yet I didn’t ignore it - go figure!
  12. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    It’s onky your opinion that we are no where as dirty as other teams - one thing I have enjoyed about our team this season is that we are more combative, more physical in our approach and do seem to go in harder. One thing I have not enjoyed about our treat is the number of stupid bookings we have picked up for dissent - perhaps that comes with being more combative, we counter more. Oh and also on the end of some stupid refereeing - like Collum - but for me that stat does not point to or prove an agenda.
  13. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    At least calling folk paranoid stays on topic - folk bring up my politics - age - and other external shite to validate their argument - it’s funny, and predictable. Also I have been provided with NO ( that is ZERO) FACTS that prove there is an agenda against us - there ate many interpretation and opinions of incidents, and rationale behind this or that decisions but not one fact! And interpretation is always in the eye of the beholder. Hence why I always state my opinion is just that - an opinion - but facts - would love you to give me a FACT that proves agenamda or bias.
  14. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    I would struggle with there being an ‘agenda’ in the corridors of power but absolutely agree that the lack of transparency in the SFA ( like who makes decisions, how they reach that conclusion etc) is shocking in a modern public body and leads to the type of speculation that feeds ( some) paranoia. It’s quite funny actually - I was speaking to a couple of dons fans who think SFA always favours us - why else were two of our red cards rescinded ( - which kinda prove my point of ‘it’s how you view these things’ ) (btw we all agreed refs are shocking)
  15. Bluepeter9

    SFA to hold summit over refereeing

    Not really - it’s what happens on here pretty often - folk don’t like their arguments debunked and when they realise that they resort to some sort of personal abuse as if that gives their argument more weight and mines less. Pathetic and sad.
×