Bluepeter9

Sigh
Reading this thread - makes me want a dictictorial owner with 100% control - Can you imagine fan ownership the way some go on!
At least with a single owner we know who to throw mud at - seems we throw a lot of mud at our own..... and I am not talking about differing opinions - debate, even from widly disparate points of view, is valid, but gets personalised all the time.
Chris Graham was a breath of fresh air when he started speaking about the club - but rather than support that some wanted to miro-manage it, Chris defends himself and a slanging match ensues and now, like the board room battles I have no idea who is right or wrong.
Oh and use of the 'C' word is shocking (unless in the very occasional and witty rejoinder, but even then perhaps should not be used!)

Sigh
Reading this thread - makes me want a dictictorial owner with 100% control - Can you imagine fan ownership the way some go on!
At least with a single owner we know who to throw mud at - seems we throw a lot of mud at our own..... and I am not talking about differing opinions - debate, even from widly disparate points of view, is valid, but gets personalised all the time.
Chris Graham was a breath of fresh air when he started speaking about the club - but rather than support that some wanted to miro-manage it, Chris defends himself and a slanging match ensues and now, like the board room battles I have no idea who is right or wrong.
Oh and use of the 'C' word is shocking (unless in the very occasional and witty rejoinder, but even then perhaps should not be used!)

For information ... the image that ctsamomusa included a conversation I (@Acemcl) had with Chris regarding a post about Frankie in here.
I stated that the lunatics have taken over the asylum (IMO) in that there are certain posters on RM that will turn any thread about RST/Chris Graham etc into an all out slagging match, personal insults will fly in both directions & basically I felt that many threads were completely ruined because they were always turned towards personality clashes rather than the actual topic at hand (see the Charles Green leaves thread as a classic case in point)
I have always liked RM, even written for it (long time ago now) and have always enjoyed the openness it allowed, however, recently that permissive stance has, again IMO, been abused by posters (in both camps) allowing a free-for-all in threads to turn into quagmires of insults.
I do hope that, one day, we can get back to discussing football & not a lot else.

Daly to lead the line and score!

Everything's fine but enough wiggle room for the moaners to find things that MIGHT be wrong

Boardroom's den?

Now I wisnae at queens street but my 'visualisation ' of this is 4-5 wee nerds in green shell a suits acting hard - and all our pubervesant Internet warriors reacting by saying 'give them a slap' I doubt civil war will break out anytime soon

Ha ha ha spoken like a true moron.....so "standing up to intimidation" amounts to getting into a mass brawl at queen street station in front of kids, families and more importantly cameras....yeah great idea genius!
Use your head and read my full posts on this thread.

Say that to my face ya cunt!

All those people saying 'leather them', etc make me laugh. It's easy to be a hard man on the Internet.

Now it's clear why Ally wants Gallacher sent out for experience, even when he plays he's not getting any .

But what you say is "FACT"???....I have yet to see you back up your claims made earlier in this thread re our financial state and the actions of Walter and Mather that you stated were fact!
You are becoming quite tedious with your constant name calling and posturing towards a certain poster....your FAO Mr Rangers post that has rightly been locked is just embarrassing! Do you honestly think the way to get your questions answered is to insult someone?
He has said a statement you made is nonsense, the easy way to handle it is to prove otherwise without all the back and forth stuff. The burden of proof is on you....you are the one stating things as FACT!

Open thread on a public forum -want to be about rangers - if it wasn't in the bears den I would not be here - it is so ill entry - my comment this has fk all to do with rangers - the fact a few posters are going to a walk has no more relevance than a few posters will be going to t on the park - in fact here will probably be more rangers fans at t in the park than on the walk so probably more relevant but that wouldnae be a bears den topic either

Threats - a thread in the bears dem that has fuck all to do with Rangers and you make threats!
So bears den?

What absolute shite - rangers wee started 200 years or so after this and were in no way started with anything to do with it - if you are going to post at least try for some accuracy !

Yep I am sure you would love to have editorial rights to stifle free speech - you want to march and chat about it in the bears den - find - but then ill post in the thread - or to you bievr on censorship - only your opinions and your ill should be heard ! What shite

Or is it just a pile of pish which gets people who dont know fuck all about it foaming at the mouth.
Oh and pleases the paedo's

I dont think we will do this every summer - I think this is the squad we will use as the basis for our SPL assault with only 2-4 players in AND out every year to increase quality but this 'spree' is that foundation. Last season we looked woefully weak interms of squad depth but we cant say that this time.
From what I see Ally is trying to address all the critisisms leveled at the team last year - and he (and the board) have removed any excuses (which is what many moaned about) - I admire that about Ally - he has taken away all excuses so we now (even I) look for improved performances as th platform to get back to the top.

Threats - a thread in the bears dem that has fuck all to do with Rangers and you make threats!
So bears den?

A celebration of hatred and bigotry with no place in Scotland today. Get it to fuck from Rangers, there's no connection whatsoever.

A bit like you do, in any national team threads that pop up. Not nice when people come in threads just to have a sly dig, is it? Crying to admin, when you do the same thing is retarded.

Was thinking this mahsel... You can debate Greggs pies until your keyboard is well and truly battered... But have the temerity to slag a buncha numpties parading aboot dressed like Mr Benn and you get censored.
Each to their own I suppose.

You can hardly put two sentences together
Who gave you access to a computer.
You know im right. Must be the way you were brought up. No wonder Scotland falls behind everyone around it. Stuck in the past thats what it is.

I can understand why you guys want the board to make more statements.
Me, I am happy with them making the statements they are because they are revealing NOTHING to those would destroy us.
It would be folly to reveal our revenge before we carry it out.

All directors are equal in law but non - executive directors generally don't take part in day to day running of the company that is done by executive directors - such as a CEO or marketing director, financial director etc. A chairman will usually be here to guide and lead strategy, direction etc. A non exec does that on usually a oversight/ experience basis and and exec does the actual implementation. so an exec chairman will lead and make day to day decisions but a non- exec will only provide leadership and experience. in companies it is usually the Chairman and or CEO who also act as the public 'face' of the board ( but not exclusively so)
hope that helps on a general way