kerzzo

My DD will remain in place and will still be purchasing my season ticket no matter who owns the club.

The deal with JJB will still go on - they could just claim they have the rights to any merchandise sold with our club badge on it.

This is going to be the 1st time I have done a bungee jump. At though if anyone on the page would like to donate to the charity any donations would be greatly appreciated. http://www.justgiving.com/William-Kerr2

I am doing it this year (dreading it though as terrified of heights)

It could possibly be swally I won'y doubt that. BH are a new group hoping to succeed in Ibrox with a singing section, all the talk of against Loyalist songs is a lot of crap, they have admin who stay in Belfast. The group wants the traditional songs back both Loyalist/Rangers but won't participate in songs that risk getting the club in trouble su ch as TBB. All they are against is most of the Ultra Chants - and to be honest half of them are cringeworthy anyway.

The guy who had the banner was originally heading to Murray Park. I can't answer why they were at Ibrox with the banner, in the end the banner they displayed showed they will support the club ever more - I don't fault those who turned up, probably reasons why can be questioned as some say they were there in protest others say they were there in unity of support. I without a doubt believe that those who own the BH banner were there in Unity of support.

Swally last night was nothing to do with BH, a guy turned up with the banner but don't make out something like BH wanted on TV

SoK yes we will always have a divided support as we will have fans for and fans against the Union. In the end as I have said put everything aside whether it be the Union/Supporters Clubs/Supporters Groups, this is about THE RANGERS a 140 year old Institution which is/was very close to liquidation (which ever way you want to look at it). We should all get rid if the divide between our support and all rally together as one (as long as dingwallet gets nowhere near the club).

Stato you just seem like someone trying to want to cause a lot of shit. In the end this is not about supporters groups/fans/supporters buses etc - we should all be UNITED together in support that our club will come out of administration and not lose 140yrs history. And incase you ask no I was not part of those who were outside Ibrox last night

They are certainly not the same person as I know who is behind the BH name

That could be true, but if you go back to from around page 14 in the topic (I am sure that is where BH was 1st mentioned). The topic all surrounded that BH were against Loyalist songs - infact it even caused the beginning of a new topic about Ulster Bears. As I have said BH were only partially against the Ultra Chants nothing to do with the Loyalist songs, as pointed out one of the ones running the BH group is from Ulster. In the end we should stop trying to be a divided support and rather look to being more UNITED.

Bluepeter the group BH has never been against signing loyalist songs (one clown not going to put anyone's personal name on a forum) started all this because one person asked why did we sing more Loyalist songs than Rangers songs (bear in mind this person comes from Belfast and one of the group admin comes from Belfast). I am not here to brand BH name, but it is more rumours than anything. BH have always said they would sign Loyalist songs (they are partially against the Ultra Chants that are happening these day) just as a lot of other fans in the ground are. Does that make them any less a Rangers fan than the next person NO. And if you want any answers if I am into Loyalist songs go ask Rangersgary he will tell you as he knows me.

I'm no doubting the VB, but that part just does not make sense about the bill as has already been said above, if they feel that can't be challenged how can the EBT be challenged which is an older debt. I have contacted a m8 in the VB regarding it though.

Wouldn't matter whether one was VAT and one Income Tax or not. Same rules apply. Was a good read, but the part about the small tax case is nonsense.

The small tax case 6yrs old is the part that worries me as they claim it can't be challenged. HMRC have the right to chase any money due to them up to the previous 20yrs