FatPirateHooker

Total scumbag, always has been.

What a disgrass.

Top 8 he'll get with them imo. In with Villa + Everton.

Becuase they like Sunderland?

No your not.

If I was SAF I'd do what the bollocks I wanted too tbf.

Hillington/Cardonald.

Neither of them started the game today btw, both are fully fit.

Why didnt you go to see St. Mirren then?

Torres hasnt been good for 2 year now, but atleast you can slightly justify his price tag knowing that there is the chance he could get back on form. Carroll on the other hand...

Torres - 6 games, 2 sub appearances, 2 goals. Carroll - 7 games, 2 sub appearances, 2 goals.

Good thread for pish jokes. Anyway, poor guy.

10 points clear, and getting booed Only football fans. Arseholes turning up to games thinking they deserve to see their team win.

Right, that's it, I'm leaving the country. Who's with me lads!

Tbf, what on earth can clubs do to stop people singing these songs?

FUCK IM GONA ROLL N TO THREADS AND NOT EVEN GIVE A FUCK! FUCK!

Prove it.

Is what the North Stand of OT will be called. Thought it was an excelent tribute to him. 25 years at the helm tomorow.

What's the reason to lots of the protesters covering up their faces?

Shows your limited grasp on football I guess.

Is it not embarrassing seeing half the teams in the Spanish league go up against Barca or Madrid then?

Having trouble gettign used to the controls, but it seems solid.

Why would a million people unite on any single issue? I'm not a sheep, I'm not going to think one way or act one way just because of some hypothetical predetermined oath.

BBC latest dig at Rangers The Glorious Revolution, 1688 Myth: The revolution was glorious The Catholic James II ("dismal Jimmy", as Nell Gwynne called him) came to power in 1685, but lasted a mere three years before fleeing to France in what came to be called the "Glorious Revolution". James's flight and his replacement by the Protestant William of Orange was viewed as an example of pragmatic, bloodless reform, in contrast to the current and future convulsions elsewhere in Europe. Mural of William of Orange in Belfast William of Orange's legacy is still revered by many The truth is a little different. It was bloodless only because James capitulated. William's Dutchmen invaded illegally and with main force, from a land with which England had only recently been at war. He brought a huge fleet of 463 ships and some 40,000 men. Parliament had not requested such an invasion, the King clearly hadn't and the "invitation" from six peers and a bishop was constitutionally irrelevant. England was attacked by a foreign ruler to usurp a legitimate monarch. The invasion was clearly treasonable but, as the saying goes, "if treason prosper, none dare call it treason".

I still have BBC as my homepage, but have never used BBC Scotland for anything except maybe the weather.