Jump to content

supermac

Senior Member
  • Posts

    3,540
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by supermac

  1. Thats our Church of Scotland reverend speaking. Pipe down.
  2. Thomson was far more expressive on the park. His aggression in the tackle endeared him to the fans. A very clever player and in my opinion above Jack, at present. Jack continues to surprise me though, I didn’t think it would work out when he first signed and indeed last season was a bit stop start. The signs this season are very encouraging.
  3. I said yes to Lee Robinson in the poll only because I think he's a decent back up keeper. That being said is rather Liam Kelly was Cammy Bell's understudy. Can't believe so many people would keep Kyle Hutton he's a brutal midfielder.
  4. Best right back option we've played this season. Hopefully he's fit again soon.
  5. Exactly anyone who is involved in our club should provide clarity to our support. It's the least anyone could do considering what we've been through.
  6. When Murray was on the board, our stadium, training facilities, naming rights, our crest, our retail were all safe.
  7. Thanks for posting. A really good interview that gives us a good insight into the goings on at MP, good and bad.
  8. Ally believed we had offered Gordon and Scott Allen deals. I tend to believe him despite his shortcomings as a manager. I think the board shafted him on those signings.
  9. Easy to be "a good Rangers man" on that wage. I suppose in any other walk of life you'd be saying fair play. On the other hand we need to look at who the feck allowed the kit man to earn so much!
  10. I have no doubt he would improve us short to medium term. I'd be much more comfortable with McCall being part of the coaching set up at Rangers similar to the role at Scotland as you mention. You're right he did work wonders with them season on season. However it's a big step up to manage us as you know. He could lose a game one week with Motherwell with little reaction from the fans. In comparison with our fans it's the end of the world if we lose. He'd be an ideal assistant as he has his own views on players and tactics as opposed to a yes man holding a clip board.
  11. They are just shite and don't care, the majority anyway. As long as they get a wage at the end of the week, I don't think it affects most of them. We took ex spl players who of course cantered the lower leagues. However, they have failed to gain the hunger for success and now that they are earning treble what they would ever have earned elsewhere. They are quite happy to slip back into mediocrity. Bad times but we have very few real Rangers quality players/people at the club.
  12. It's all very well McCall man managing Nicky Law but we need the team to play better not just one overpaid Shitebag. I respect McCall as a coach, but, manager of Rangers I could never see him be a success. He quit Motherwell as he ran out of ideas with them. What hope would he have as manager of the most scrutinised position in Scottish football. P.S as stated I love McCall and would love him to prove me wrong.
  13. No, there are alternatives which would be easier. I.e the board getting everyone who is willing to assist Rangers round a table and discussing the best way forward. Also it would help if Somers could go, as he is only in it for himself.
  14. To quote the late great Bill Struth. '"...Never fear, inevitably we shall have our years of failure, and when they arrive, we must reveal tolerance and sanity. No matter the days of anxiety that come our way, we shall emerge stronger because of the trials to be overcome. That has been the philosophy of the Rangers since the days of the gallant pioneers."
  15. Why? Ashley has paid the going rate but in return has had naming rights for £1, advertising rights for £1, a heavily Ashley favoured merchandise deal and god knows what else. These guys support the club and do not want to line the pockets of the crooked board in charge. This investment must be welcomed, safe in the knowledge that if these guys get in on the board they'll blow the whistle on any dodgy dealings. Why? Because they're interested in the future of the club.
  16. Yes. In our first season under Ally everything was going great, then Naismith got injured. Ally did not have a plan to compensate for his loss. In the lower leagues he has no excuses as we still had more resource than any other club. Yes he won us promotion x 2 but he's left a squad that is devoid of leaders and players in which we can build a solid base on for many years to come. Lewis Macleod being the exception there, but we'll see what happens with him in January.
  17. Shot down with a spud gun. When is anyone at this club going to have a backbone and stand up for the club. Where's our modern day Struth's and Jock Wallace's, I guess they are sadly a thing of the past. RE Donald Findlay, I see you as a new person as your new opinion of Rangers doesn't reflect the character I saw you as, thus making you a 'new gobshite'.
  18. Andy Little - Released Kyle Hutton - 1 year extension Will never understand that one.
  19. Because Lee McCulloch is the gaffers pal and he see's Jig as Davie Weir MK II With regards to Moshni, Ally sees him as a good laugh and a great character so that nullifies all his wayward passing, tantrums and general shiteness. Sorry to be so negative but I don't think I'm too far from the truth.
  20. Perhaps you're right, I do care how Rangers fans are portrayed to the rest of the UK and the world and the media reaches these places. I want us to have a better reputation because we are the best fans in the world but are wrongly vilified like in Manchester for example. I would have just preferred it if there were no Rangers tops/flags that the media could have got their claws into because quite clearly it's more than just Rangers fans in Scotland who care passionately about the Union.
  21. There was Rangers flags in various videos and pictures. I just question why people would even bring such a thing to something like that on a Friday night.
  22. I'd say on both sides there were unsavoury characters yes. I didn't mean to categorise everyone who visited George Square that was wrong of me, I'm just saying there were defiantly some people there for one reason and it was to wind up the other side. With such passionate people there from both sides trouble was bound to happen unless the police did there job...of course sadly they didn't.
  23. Fair doos all I know is Scotland spoke on the Thursday by unanimously voting No case closed on the subject therefore I fail to see why anyone would want to go to George Square on a Friday night when there are plenty of other things to do. The point which I was trying to make initially which perhaps got lost was I don't for the life of me know why people brought Rangers flags because the media jumped on it.
  24. No Rangers fans don't go looking for a fight. rangers fans in the whole are decent members of society a class above if you will. There is a small percentage of people who would rather go to George square on a Friday night wearing their best casuals gear, get pissed and fight (not insinuating they started it before you say they threw the first stone) My argument still stands, nobody should have brought any Rangers memorabilia to George Square that Friday. NOT because it wasn't their right blah blah blah bullshit. Because it was not anything to do with Rangers and in the off chance things got violent the media would not be able to associate Rangers with the fights. The Yes voters had just got pumped in the vote the night before of course they were angry and would cause a fight. These people who visited George square should be fully aware the Scottish media is corrupt and would have portrayed the supporters of the Union to be the baddies and hey they certainly gave them enough good pictures and videos so they could edit them to their advantage, bravo.
×
×
  • Create New...