TheLawMan

Club Legend
  • Content count

    12,557
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by TheLawMan

  1. Is there a free carvery that night ?
  2. Where abouts?
  3. Another problem is the style of football. Allys lump and humph was never going to suit him. Warburtons would have been more suited to his style of football, though with Hearts, the trick was that he could get by someone then find strikers in the box...................so...................ultimately no to Warburtons as well.
  4. It's kind of hard to ignore the Chris Graham part though at least it confirms what a number of us said all along about him and Furys lies on here about refusing a position etc. Blazer chasing at its very finest.
  5. There is clearly an earlier thread, when it WAS about Edmiston House. That thread is the evolved one.
  6. The goalposts changed at some point but make no mistake about it the original plan was 100% to do with Edmiston House. There was an attempt to fudge things when the plans changed but I had read the original incorporation document which was very clear.
  7. Dingwall as well saying "Houstie is a talent" No wonder we are in such a state.
  8. Buster on FF sticking up for Houston. Reekin. Always knew it.
  9. ???
  10. You know what. Gonna give some credit to Chris Graham. When it was clear there were issues about being appointed to the board, he removed himself. When it was clear he would have divided fans if he went on 1872 board, which he would have been voted on, he removed himself. Houstons self interest won't allow him to remove himself. Even CG is inadvertingly calling this out.
  11. Have u read the thread? Can u guess?
  12. Esky always has been a credit.
  13. He lied through his teeth. Talked shit. But got people believing his lies. Made a mug of good fans. He is an arsehole.
  14. Always had a lot of time for you Ross. Probably closer to all of this than the rest of us. How can they let this happen. Why does Houston and Blair have so much power?
  15. Houston is a cunt. End of. Not surprised in the slightest and the fact the others allowed these resignations speaks volumes. From day one I've said he is in it for himself. Point proven. As for 1872. Dead.
  16. Brill
  17. Met a lot of great people and contacts in there most of whom still in weekly contact with. Not been back in it since 2011 when i made a conscious decision not to renew all our packages.
  18. This. Missing it badly.
  19. The point remains. And it was an "if"
  20. If he has been put on gardening leave for anything to do with us the Warburtons legal team will be peeing their pants right now.
  21. Think I have been lost for a long time. Incompetent arseholes one after the other entrusted with our future. Each one as bad as the other.
  22. What an absolute cluster fuck.
  23. Just a quick thrown together idea.............. "As the fifth largest shareholder in RIFC, Club 1872 is committed to ensuring that our members’ voices are heard on all issues affecting the Club and its supporters. Members have contacted us in recent days and weeks to express concerns around some such issues. Stuart Robertson has agreed to meet the Directors of Club 1872 on Monday 27th February. We will use this meeting to continue to share with the Club our members’ concerns around the nature of communication between the Club and the wider fan-base, and seek clarification on how the Club intends to resolve the management situation and other issues. We will also be looking to clarify the short term investment plan of the Board and/or other parties, in relation to statements given in the aftermath of taking control of the Club. It is vital our members, and other shareholders, have transparency around this investment plan and complete clarity as to when the existing loans will be converted to equity through the Rights Issue already agreed by the Shareholders. The Club 1872 Board appreciates the significance of these matters, and we will approach all discussions with the Club on this basis. Over the coming days, we will reach out to our members for their views on issues important to them, not covered above"
  24. The statement is garbage. If you take only a few things from Dart response on page 3 and add it to the statement then it becomes much stronger. Instead it was a puff piece given the balance of "we've done something" without actually doing it and without upsetting the board.