Jump to content

legalbeagle

Senior Member
  • Posts

    10,880
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by legalbeagle

  1. Always good to have our usual minority of trolls (and no, that doesn't apply to anyone with reservations) rehashing their old nonsense as they whinge away about this appointment.

    i watched Greg try and try and try on here, giving answers and engaging with people who were often snide or downright rude to him. What it demonstrated is that those who demand answers don't really want them, they would rather have conspiracies to talk about.

     

  2. 4 minutes ago, Virtuoso said:

    Not true.

    Houston refused to disband SoS, even though they no longer continued to serve the purpose for which they created.

    How was one of Kings rent-a-mob ever going to be against him in any way shape or form whilst sitting on C1872.

    You couldn't make it up.

    Even in the event of that being the case, it was still known before the elections, if Club 1872 members were happy with that situation and him representing them, then fair enough (and I didn't vote for him either).

    i just think this situation is a whole different kettle of fish.

  3. All the debates before around conflicts of interest, etc, centred on James Blair, at least in his case it was all up front at the time when the members were voting, so although I didn't vote for him, it didn't concern me that he was on the board. I would separate this out as a different issue, this is just one person who is either oblivious to what could be a conflict, or just too egotistical to care or take advice on it.

    Either way, totally untenable and I am sure many of us will stop funding Club 1872 unless this is dealt with VERY quickly.

  4. 1 minute ago, pollok-bear said:

    I want to know who the fuck is leaking shit at our club. We need to get to the bottom of this. To much of our business gets leaked to these bastards.

    warburton is a prick and thinks he was bigger than rangers. Lol he couldn't be more wrong. I respected him one time but the way he has acted is a joke.

    still don't fully trust the board but dnt hink il ever trust anyone again.

    NO SURRENDER

    The heavy implication is that the management team were leaking the fact that they were under scrutiny.

  5. 6 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said:

    Oh yes, this clears up everything, fucking NOT!

    Look past the "three", we are in the brown stuff. We are going nowhere!

    With the managerial situation what else did you want or expect to be in the statement?

  6. 7 hours ago, A.T.G said:

    That idiot LeageBeagle is what's wrong with our support, I don't make banners and if I did it would be a white sheet with the most stupid unrecogniseable writing.

    There are guys in our support who makes great ones and have the opportunity to put a statement out on one of these, even if we were to be pulled up for it, guess what, it hits the news and they have no choice but to cover it.

    We have guys in vb digging old newspaper articles and spending hours trying to find out the ones who have done nothing but damage our reputation and figures trying to kill us off. Fucking annoying how someone has an idea and then get a stupid arsehole response like that.

    Anyway, they are a sick club who have done exactly what the FA and SFA are now saying is not acceptable! We should trying all avenues we can to get these cunts into the MSM. 

    A banner as controversial as possible would be the best place to start

    No, it is people who spend their lives 'supporting' our club by wanting somebody else to do everything. If you want this banner, go and make a good banner.

×
×
  • Create New...