Jump to content

TAFKA

New Signing
  • Posts

    1,592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Lanarkshire

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

TAFKA's Achievements

Key Player

Key Player (7/12)

545

Reputation

  1. It is spelled "whisky" - spelling it "whiskey" is the taig way. Funny how wee things catch you out, eh?
  2. I don't think Ashley wants to run Rangers - that is too much like hard work. He just wants to skim off the revenue from merchandising etc. King, on the other hand, DOES want control. The important thing is that a successful Rangers sees them both win. Therefore, as pragmatic businessmen, it is in both their interests to find a way to work together and I hope they see that too. This, of course, would also be good for the hedge-fund managers and long-term investors. We are stronger with both of these men inside the tent.
  3. Great article - shows just how far our game has fallen.
  4. Did Ashley not swerve the share issue and buy from HH thereby denying us any dosh?
  5. Gough was a legend (bit like the fanny in the dugout) but his credibility in this subject is shot. More sense from Wavy Davy
  6. Thought for a moment our CEO had disengaged his cloaking device Oh well.....
  7. You can always hope What I was after was the thinking of those who still want him to stay? Why would anyone think Rangers are benefitting in any way from keeping McCoist on?
  8. My point exactly. He's staying for the money (in my opinion) but I would really like to understand how any Rangers supporter (ie those who voted for him to stay) could possibly want him to stay a minute longer.
  9. Is he any good at karaoke? Don't know about Ian Cathro, I'd take Ian Paisley over McCoist - and yes I know he's dead - still better than The Leech
  10. Vast majority of us would give a week's wages for a change of manager ASAP but, based on the poll and Gogzy's comments, there appear to a number of true Bears (not "guest" infiltrators) who still want to give McCoist more time. Now we all know the reasons why most of us think he should have gone a long time ago, so can I ask that this thread be devoted in the main to those who would give him yet more rope? The rest of us have had our say on many other threads so - over to you, the McCoist Loyal If you are one of the guys who voted NO to "should McCoist go?", please explain because we cannot understand what further proof you need. Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...