Jump to content


First Team
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Bears

  • Rank
    Key Player

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    here & now

Recent Profile Visitors

1,229 profile views
  1. Hey John James, you award winning journalist! How do you spell 'company'? Ummm, lemme fink ... it's C - L - U - B
  2. Eh, no your first response did not answer if the matter was ever discussed beforehand, which I then asked. Much simpler if you'd just answered it then and saved us all time, instead of calling me all sorts and twisting what I was saying repeatedly because I asked the question.
  3. Not me. I've even checked by history in case I had a senior moment. I can't find me ever writing about this in your podcast threads. If you know better then let me know the date.
  4. Wrong person, matey. There you go conflating again. And no, I don't study what you wrote in all your threads. Sorry to disappoint.
  5. You clearly have no idea what I have been saying, do you? You've spent most of your time accusing me of being an idiot that what I have written has changed to your version of it. And now you're claiming to know what I would do. All I wanted to know initially was if the topic would ever come up (or was it banned oin the podcast) or had you asked their views before committing yourself to doing the podcast. Cue all sorts of crap from several folk.
  6. Complaining? I asked him clearly and finally after much throwing it back at me (including what your doing, he's now clearly said he has no interest. Fine. What's your problem? You know this is a forum, right?
  7. Neither do I. And I have never said I would. If you clearly read (instead of twisting for your benefit) what I wrote, I said I would at least want to know the views on this very important subject if I was associating with them publicly and professionally on matters of celtic football club. The fact that you don't says more about you than me, even if you have since then tried to make it all about me. Are you going to answer that point or just keep avoiding it?
  8. ... ignoring celtic and their deep-rooted child abuse problem, ... twisting what other folk say, ...filling BD with celtic crap. At least your consistent.
  9. Do you ask pretend celtic have no connection to child abuse or just when talking with their fans?
  10. Your ability to separate people's points and conflate them with other points they certainly did not make is used regularly on here. If you can't see a connection with working with celtic supporters on a football theme and their view of their club's avoidance of giving justice to proven victims of their club's employees in their very buildings then you carry on. And if you think I'm the one with the problem then fine, you carry on.
  11. Would be happy for reasons of transparency if our club opened an independent investigation on Dunn. It's not about dodging bullets, it's about justice. No, believe it or not, there are some things - like child abuse, and many others - that are bigger than football. To think otherwise is to be happy to cover it up to save your club's shame.
  12. Utterly consumed? Not in the slightest. Acting as if it never happened? Not me. Why do you need to make ridiculous accusations and ad hominems to 'prove' your point?
  13. I'd still want to know their thoughts privately at least, especially if I was associating with them professionally. But at least we agree on your last 4 words.
  • Create New...