Jump to content

Soldier blue

First Team
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Soldier blue

  • Rank
    New Signing

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

620 profile views
  1. It's a terrible reflection on the state of Scottish football and those members who don't value the truth. As a retired soldier, I'm buggered if I'd want to go to war with 33% of my Regiment prepared to publicly show their distrust in me. Bullet in the back stuff that.
  2. The definition of contradiction......make an impassioned address about a proposal and then abstain I really hope so!
  3. Read my original post again The Daily Rhebel.
  4. Sorry mate, not putting a link to that rag on here, it was a message I received but it has been verified they quoted between 30-45%
  5. Could be more than 14, the Daily Rhebel now reporting it could be up to 45%.
  6. Moral high ground is a trait for that club. Lawell knows that this will all be forensically investigated one way or the other, his silence confirms that. I could be wrong, not ITK or anything, but I have a feeling that this is how it will play out.
  7. I think this vote is irrelevant in many respects as we are not leaving it there, and they all know it. However, I have a feeling that the media narrative has changed over the past few days and there is now much more backing for an II. It is noticeable that many of the celtic-minded media hacks and ex-players are now publicly backing an II and even the bat-shit crazy Shill (Jackson) has stepped back a bit. Sutton will always be a mouthpiece for Lawell but has also cooled the rhetoric in recent press releases. Could it be that the SPFL and the puppet master have realised that an II is probably less damaging in the long run that a full-blown court case which is less controllable and may snowball into who the real culprit is? I suspect that the 3 SPFL liars are toast whatever happens but they may well hang on to negatively influence the II before they vacate. It will be a lot closer than many think, maybe even a Yes outcome, but I believe that anything over 14 Yes votes and the II will get the go-ahead from Doncaster, all in the name of accountability, of course! I expect a Yes from the unwashed too.
  8. In summary, pretty much everything the SPFL have used to justify their actions has been picked apart by Tom English and he has used Rangers dossier to discredit and answer each point from Doncaster.
  9. Tom English has picked Doncaster's replies apart line by line and the interviewer must be totally embarrassed that his interview is also being picked apart.
  10. Absolutely agree with this. It amazes me how this has been escalated by the SMSM that the dossier must now contain 'nuclear' evidence but I'm even more amazed how many Bears have bought into this transparent narrative. We have called out the anomalies in the build up and execution of the vote, stated that there was several examples of mal-administration and provided sufficient examples to justify an Independent Inquiry. We also called for the suspension of those in senior managerial positions. We have then stepped back and allowed the SPFL to execute a tail-spin. It is only my opinion, but I firmly believe that there is already enough in the public domain to justify our requests. I know of no other organisation where the senior management would be allowed to remain in post given the level of incompetence, and potentially worse, surrounding this fiasco. Even more so in light of the blatant abuse directed towards a member club for raising legitimate concerns from the SPFL and, more recently, the SFA (independent arbiters apparently). I believe that there will be concrete evidence within the dossier, however if it only contains all the evidence we all know about but presented in legal terms and format, then that can be discredited by the SMSM but it won't be in a court of law. We all need to remember that and not lose our shit about 'nuclear evidence'.
  11. I accept that fans have been royally shafted by previous boards with empty promises and bullish statements followed by no action. For me, this feels different. I believe that this board have concrete evidence that will utterly condemn the SPFL. I also think the club are following the correct protocol and are patiently going through the process to prevent accusations of improper conduct down the line. It's paying off as the SPFL board are further incriminating themselves with each action. If other clubs do not back an II then I am convinced this will be addressed in another way, ultimately in court if need be. We must stand fast and withhold all evidence from those corrupt bastards! Before I am asked, I am not ITK it's just my opinion but I am encouraged by the actions of our club this far.
  12. Utter push, as has already been said in this thread, there is more than enough evidence of malpractice in the public arena to justify suspensions. Any self governing board with nothing to fear would recognise this and initiate an independent inquiry.
  13. I wonder what the % chance of Liverpool winning the 2005 European Cup was at half-time? Or Devon Loch's % chance of winning the Grand National with 100yds to the finishing line? It's simple, nothing is won until the final whistle goes, or the winner crosses the finishing line. Until then these 'experts' can stick their percentages up their arse, it means nothing!
  14. The Dude is as entitled to his opinion as everyone else on the forum. However, he considers himself to be a journalist and we all know they love to be contrary and controversial to be relevant, he has succeeded in doing that on this subject. There is no way I would wish to be the next Sutton or Hartson! Of course he may actually believe in what he says but, as a true Rangers fan I struggle to understand why any Bear would want to promote the idea that they should be awarded the title unless it is to place self importance and relevance above the good of our club. Even if I believed that I wouldn’t be offering any credence to the argument, he needs to ask himself if any of the unwashed bloggers would be doing it for us? Who spoke up for us in the ‘Banter Years’ Dude?
  15. Soldier blue


    Let’s be serious here, we have two pretty solid CHs who cost us peanuts compared to the Braga forwards and who played like it. Katic is, IMHO a good young player who is learning and will improve and Goldson, IMHO is an excellent CH who gets it tight from a large portion of our fans. We were up against a very good team tonight and escaped with only 2 goals against, I don’t think any other Scottish team would have managed that tonight, including them!
  • Create New...