Virtuoso

Club Legend
  • Content count

    6,292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Virtuoso

  1. You not fancy reconsidering your previous stance and standing?
  2. ..followed by this attempt on FF to clear things up: http://forum.followfollow.com/showthread.php?1087415-Edmiston -House-CIC This is now almost April
  3. Edit: Double post. Treble post. Fuck knows what happened there
  4. The whole Edmiston House CIC is shroud in secrecy. According to the submitted documentation (by the Marshalls), it was originally planned that: Yet according to Greg and Rab, the Declaration for the Formation of EH CIC has nothing to do with Edmiston House - yet they submitted the above documentation, stating quite clearly the above in bold. Maybe there's two Edmiston Houses? Here is the company set up to do it: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/SC520806/officers So basically, EH CIC exists within companies house...but it doesn't feature Edmiston House itself - despite what is stated on the submitted paperwork (according to TLT). Now the CIC is signed off by James Blair here (page 46). A RIFC board member, a previous member of RF and now on the board of C1872, all very cosy....but something happened after the formation of the CIC. The previously asked questions which went unanswered were: If it doesn't feature Edmiston House, then... 1) Why call it Edmiston House CIC ? 2) Why make reference to Edmiston house throughout the incorporation document ? 3) Why specifically talk about the restoration of Edmiston House ? 4) Why specifically talk about the jobs the restoration work will create ? 5) Why specifically talk about the jobs there will be once its been restored ? 6) Why is there only one line on the "surrounding area" This CIC was about Edmiston House despite protestations otherwise. Having managed to get the gullible to swallow the RF / RST will never merge line, they obviously thought that deflection and denial would work here as well. People would have far more respect had they held up their hands and said 'this was the original plan, but something happened so it's been shelved' instead of treating people like mugs. The alternate scenario is that someone lied on the formation documents.
  5. Is Houston still keeping that 'dignified silence'?
  6. ...followed by this attempt on FF to clear things up: http://forum.followfollow.com/showthread.php?1087415-Edmiston -House-CIC This is now almost April
  7. I wouldn't think so as they're two separate entities. @eskbankloyal would know more.
  8. The whole Edmiston House CIC is shroud in secrecy. According to the submitted documentation (by the Marshalls), it was originally planned that: Yet according to Greg and Rab, the Declaration for the Formation of EH CIC has nothing to do with Edmiston House - yet they submitted the above documentation, stating quite clearly the above in bold. Maybe there's two Edmiston Houses? Here is the company set up to do it: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/SC520806/officers So basically, EH CIC exists within companies house...but it doesn't feature Edmiston House itself - despite what is stated on the submitted paperwork (according to TLT). Now the CIC is signed off by James Blair here (page 46). A RIFC board member, a previous member of RF and now on the board of C1872, all very cosy....but something happened after the formation of the CIC. The previously asked questions which went unanswered were: If it doesn't feature Edmiston House, then... 1) Why call it Edmiston House CIC ? 2) Why make reference to Edmiston house throughout the incorporation document ? 3) Why specifically talk about the restoration of Edmiston House ? 4) Why specifically talk about the jobs the restoration work will create ? 5) Why specifically talk about the jobs there will be once its been restored ? 6) Why is there only one line on the "surrounding area" This CIC was about Edmiston House despite protestations otherwise. Having managed to get the gullible to swallow the RF / RST will never merge line, they obviously thought that deflection and denial would work here as well. People would have far more respect had they held up their hands and said 'this was the original plan, but something happened so it's been shelved' instead of treating people like mugs. The alternate scenario is that someone lied on the formation documents.
  9. Highbury Arsenal v Rangers First floodlit game?
  10. Dear Mr willygers4life We require a couple of weeks to figure out a way in which to spin this and allow Craig Houston to remain in his role. Kind Regards William Cowie (Craig Houstons nominator) Club 1872
  11. The members won't vote him off. The deflect, deny and smearing tactics have started - it will be turned around to 'poor Houston'. The three resignees to be replaced with more people of Houstons ilk. Job done.
  12. Where do you see it going from here?
  13. The worst thing is, all statements are released through him, SVL. You couldn't make it up.
  14. https://andersonstrathern.co.uk/our-people/james-blair/
  15. I thought that James Blair (a lawyer) had ratified the consitution - so how is it still being written?
  16. They really should proof read before releasing a statement...
  17. A concentrated effort from the giggle gang and FF to push his name. I stand corrected here, but wasn't he the only candidate to be invited to Belfast and Larne on a pre-C1872 publicity tour?
  18. The following was posted last night on the SoS page: It was subsequently chopped when people starting asking questions
  19. If Houston goes, either of his own accord or voted off, I'd expect his nominator William Cowie to step down. Blair leaves after one year. That leaves Alex Cowie who has been chasing a blazer and a place on the board for years.
  20. In the meantime, Club1869
  21. Twitterer and blogger Cat Boyd. Another hate-filled bastard who writes for The National https://twitter.com/kittycatboyd This is her latest: Time to go home...
  22. Ha. At work and have my screen minimised. James Doleman, getting the beasts to crowdfund him to cover our various ongoing court cases. He'll be one demanding we have titles stripped if we lose. https://twitter.com/jamesdoleman
  23. Alex Thomson of Ch4 - courted by Philth Mc...but has since went quiet on us. Ewing Grahame of the Telegraph James Doleman
  24. McNally, ex-journalist from the Mirror. Another rabid bheast who now contributes to various online blogs and fanzines https://twitter.com/McNallyMirror
  25. Tom English Brian McNally