And another thing...

I guess you didn't read all the posts....http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-08-20/stiglitz-says-u-k-would-drop-denial-of-pound-to-scotland.html http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-28929433

Guess you didn't read the links.

Thanks for your concern, but I thought I was Hamish? Your short term memory seems to be affected. Sounds like you enjoy a toke yourself.

I've almost I rarely touch it anymore, although it's tempting when I go out for a walk and you can smell it growing. In a couple of months the air will be thick with the scent. Reminds me of India .I prefer malt whisky in my old age.

Well I'm not going to read the Telegraph, Express, Daily Record, Sun etc and few of you are going to read economics expert's opinions, so we're stuck at name calling. Not much else can be said here. It's getting too darn silly.

Move to California, everybody's growing it where I live . Legally!

Oh dear.

So you didn't read it. I'm not surprised. You can't argue with the quotes he uses. But you probably will.

Do yourself a favour. http://wingsoverscotland.com/lies-lies-lies-lies-lies/

If you read the link I just posted you'll see your own "brightness" has been called into question.

"the Royal Navy HAS in fact commissioned warships from abroad, most notably Canada and the US, during the World Wars."http://wingsoverscotland.com/lies-lies-lies-lies-lies/ Sorry about the title they use - they apologize for it too - but it has some answers to your question that you don't seem to know about.

That's right! I look for the most credible people to inform me, in this case economics professors, rather than politicians and biased newspapers, and you regard that as not very bright? Says a lot about you.

Is that what you do to people who disagree with you?

As I keep saying, and others too, casting a vote depending on which football team you support is insane.

There ye go.."This guy doesn't think like the majority. He must be a troll. Get him oot."

Ffs, GB is the fucking islands, ya clown, the land. We will unite to protect them as before, ya clown.

Don't believe anything I say, ffs, listen to the economics professors who actually know what they fuck they're talking about. Or don't.

I find my time better used to searching online for economics professor's opinions on Independence as I believe what they say. I do not believe politicians, whether they're for or against independence. So far the economists I've found seem inclined to favour independence. Check out some of my links above. Even a Nobel Prize winning economist says Scotland will be in better shape if independent.But I don't think anyone here will follow these links as most of them made their mind up when they became Rangers supporters.

The special relationship between England and Scotland will still be there. We will still be unified if GB comes under threat. You seem to think England will erect another Hadrian's Wall. I don't think that much will actually change.

I'm sure the Scottish MOD could have ships built. There you go, just saved you thousands of jobs.

How dense are you? I'm Scottish so it has everything to do with me. Just cause I currently live abroad doesn't mean I don't care what happens in my country.It benefits the MOD to use Scotland for their warships. If it didn't they would go elsewhere. It's more Project Fear "You'll lose all the jobs!!!" Bullshit. Have the No people told you how many new jobs would be created? No, of course not.

How will it benefit the MOD to stop using Scotland's shipyards? How much money will it save them? Is it another bluff to instill fear? Yes, it is.

The express link is exactly scaremongering. They "may" have to take jobs south. It "could" happen. Classic Project Fear.As I posted earlier, the Nobel Prize winning economist has called out the No campaign for their fear and bluffing regarding moving jobs out of Scotland and not allowing Scotland to use sterling. But keep reading the Unionist papers; you don't want your blinkers to come off. Also, as I said earlier, I like to get my information from economists as they're going to be honest, not politicians and biased newspapers.