I know I'm in a minority with this (and I'll say before anyone starts Kenny Miller is done as a player ability-wise) but there was never any proof Miller was the mole - it was Pedro looking for someone to blame and he might have put 2+2 together and got 5.
What actual proof do we have he was taking club information to the papers? the word of a maniac manager who talked the most amount of pish I'd ever heard and made a habit of scapegoating players to cover his own failings?
I'm open-minded though - someone give me something concrete Miller was the mole and I'll be the first to demand his contract his terminated but this stuff about he's running the club, calling all the shots is nonsense IMO.
Rightly or wrongly (wrongly IMO) he get's picked because of his experience and the apparent lack of better alternatives upfront (Herrera and Hardie)
Miller's time is up but performance wise he's honestly no worse than the rest of them. Seriously. They are all as bad as each other but guys like Miller and Windass are the ones that get lynched every week and others like Tav, Jack, Candiaes, John seem to get away with murder.
PS - I do agree with people who's annoyed at his agent saying what he did the other month. That wasn't befitting. There's a time and a place, that shit should have been done in-house. There's no excuse for that.