papaguy51 912 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 If McGregor doesn't play then it's a major slap in the face. Not only is he fitter, he's currently the better keeper of the two. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 If McGregor doesn't play then it's a major slap in the face. Not only is he fitter, he's currently the better keeper of the two. i honestly don't know who burley will go with papa, no point trying to figure out what he thinks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 If McGregor doesn't play then it's a major slap in the face. Not only is he fitter, he's currently the better keeper of the two. i honestly don't know who burley will go with papa, no point trying to figure out what he thinks McGregor would be about 300 times more entitled to walk away from the international setup that Boyd was, if he is indeed dropped for Gordon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,705 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 Dunno if all these people are fit, but Id play Mcgregor Broadfoot Caldwell Mcmanus Naysmith Fletcher Brown Ferguson Morrison ------------------ Commons Mcfadden Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 Dunno if all these people are fit, but Id play Mcgregor Broadfoot Caldwell Mcmanus Naysmith Fletcher Brown Ferguson Morrison ------------------ Commons Mcfadden That defence Just as Huntelaar is hitting form for Madrid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 If McGregor doesn't play then it's a major slap in the face. Not only is he fitter, he's currently the better keeper of the two. i honestly don't know who burley will go with papa, no point trying to figure out what he thinks McGregor would be about 300 times more entitled to walk away from the international setup that Boyd was, if he is indeed dropped for Gordon. isolated case and totally irrelevent papa. The fact we are getting at here is mcgregor is playing week in week out and is match fit where on the other hand we have gordon who has done a fantastic job in the past for us but has been dropped. On paper its fucking obvious who has to start against the dutch but i have a funny feeling this clueless cunt will have allan sitting on the bench. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest therabbitt Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 Why does Naysmith still play for Scotland? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 If McGregor doesn't play then it's a major slap in the face. Not only is he fitter, he's currently the better keeper of the two. i honestly don't know who burley will go with papa, no point trying to figure out what he thinks McGregor would be about 300 times more entitled to walk away from the international setup that Boyd was, if he is indeed dropped for Gordon. isolated case and totally irrelevent papa. The fact we are getting at here is mcgregor is playing week in week out and is match fit where on the other hand we have gordon who has done a fantastic job in the past for us but has been dropped. On paper its fucking obvious who has to start against the dutch but i have a funny feeling this clueless cunt will have allan sitting on the bench. It wasn't a Boyd bashing, but I was lightly critical of Boyd for not persevering with Scotland more, given that he wasn't featuring that regularly in big games with Rangers. I didn't want anyone saying 'You moaned about Krissy doing it and not McGregor'. So I'm just saying that McGregor's form and ability really just now means that if he's dropped for an unfit Gordon, the chances are that he'll never be favoured by Burley and would be as well telling him to stuff it. He is the number 1 Scottish goalie just now and Burley should pick accordingly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juno 2 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 McGregor Broadfoot Berra Weir McManus Brown Morrison Fletcher Ferguson Commons Iwelumo A counter attacking 4-5-1/4-3-3 that does NOT require the full backs to attack would be our best bet. Old school style. 4 centre halfs that are there to purely win the ball, and as soon as they do they give it to the midfield with minimum hoofing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 If McGregor doesn't play then it's a major slap in the face. Not only is he fitter, he's currently the better keeper of the two. i honestly don't know who burley will go with papa, no point trying to figure out what he thinks McGregor would be about 300 times more entitled to walk away from the international setup that Boyd was, if he is indeed dropped for Gordon. isolated case and totally irrelevent papa. The fact we are getting at here is mcgregor is playing week in week out and is match fit where on the other hand we have gordon who has done a fantastic job in the past for us but has been dropped. On paper its fucking obvious who has to start against the dutch but i have a funny feeling this clueless cunt will have allan sitting on the bench. It wasn't a Boyd bashing, but I was lightly critical of Boyd for not persevering with Scotland more, given that he wasn't featuring that regularly in big games with Rangers. I didn't want anyone saying 'You moaned about Krissy doing it and not McGregor'. So I'm just saying that McGregor's form and ability really just now means that if he's dropped for an unfit Gordon, the chances are that he'll never be favoured by Burley and would be as well telling him to stuff it. He is the number 1 Scottish goalie just now and Burley should pick accordingly. but its burley Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,705 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 If McGregor doesn't play then it's a major slap in the face. Not only is he fitter, he's currently the better keeper of the two. i honestly don't know who burley will go with papa, no point trying to figure out what he thinks McGregor would be about 300 times more entitled to walk away from the international setup that Boyd was, if he is indeed dropped for Gordon. isolated case and totally irrelevent papa. The fact we are getting at here is mcgregor is playing week in week out and is match fit where on the other hand we have gordon who has done a fantastic job in the past for us but has been dropped. On paper its fucking obvious who has to start against the dutch but i have a funny feeling this clueless cunt will have allan sitting on the bench. It wasn't a Boyd bashing, but I was lightly critical of Boyd for not persevering with Scotland more, given that he wasn't featuring that regularly in big games with Rangers. I didn't want anyone saying 'You moaned about Krissy doing it and not McGregor'. So I'm just saying that McGregor's form and ability really just now means that if he's dropped for an unfit Gordon, the chances are that he'll never be favoured by Burley and would be as well telling him to stuff it. He is the number 1 Scottish goalie just now and Burley should pick accordingly. In all fairness, Burleys choice to put Iwelumo on did come back and bite him in the rear though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 If McGregor doesn't play then it's a major slap in the face. Not only is he fitter, he's currently the better keeper of the two. i honestly don't know who burley will go with papa, no point trying to figure out what he thinks McGregor would be about 300 times more entitled to walk away from the international setup that Boyd was, if he is indeed dropped for Gordon. isolated case and totally irrelevent papa. The fact we are getting at here is mcgregor is playing week in week out and is match fit where on the other hand we have gordon who has done a fantastic job in the past for us but has been dropped. On paper its fucking obvious who has to start against the dutch but i have a funny feeling this clueless cunt will have allan sitting on the bench. It wasn't a Boyd bashing, but I was lightly critical of Boyd for not persevering with Scotland more, given that he wasn't featuring that regularly in big games with Rangers. I didn't want anyone saying 'You moaned about Krissy doing it and not McGregor'. So I'm just saying that McGregor's form and ability really just now means that if he's dropped for an unfit Gordon, the chances are that he'll never be favoured by Burley and would be as well telling him to stuff it. He is the number 1 Scottish goalie just now and Burley should pick accordingly. In all fairness, Burleys choice to put Iwelumo on did come back and bite him in the rear though and there is no fucking way fletcher should get pumped on instead of boyd....no fucking way, but boyd has fuck all to do with this thread so il leave it be Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 Boyd does have something to do with it, only because Burley's mantra of 'picking players who are actually' playing was the reason around him being dropped, and it's the crux of the Gordon/McGregor debate. IMHO, of course Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 _____________________________McGregor______________________________ ______________________Caldwell________McManus______________________ Hutton_____________________________________________________Naysmith ______________________________Hartley_______________________________ ________________________Brown________Fletcher_______________________ Morrison___________________________________________________Commons _____________________________McCormack____________________________ Broadfoot has been struggling for Rangers and is not fit. I wouldn't risk him as he's also been playing poorly. If McManus isn't fit then Weir comes in. The choice of strikers (Clarkson, Iwelumo, Miller, McCormack and Fletcher) are appauling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 I was just about to type a line up until i realised it was exactly the same as yours Muff. I don't have any great passion for Scotland but Ferguson has done nothing to justify starting for them considering his form for us. No doubt he'll start as even at international level he seems to be undroppable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddrock 107 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 who fuckin cares Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 who fuckin cares Obviously you do or you wouldn't have posted in this thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 I'm not a Scotland fan (obviously) but if Craig Gordon gets on ahead of McGregor Burley is being a hypocrite. He has the same situation on his hands with the Boyd fiasco. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 who fuckin cares well feel free to leave the thread because i do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hammer 11 2,575 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 We're gonna get fucked imagine caldwell and mcanus trying to deal with the dutch.Robben will tear thema new arsehole on the wings and brown couldn't lace sneijders boots Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManchestGer 347 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 Our defence scares me. I'm not a fan of playing unfit players but on this occasion if Hutton does alright tonight I would rather have him ahead of Broadfoot. Holland's pace and counter attacking football can be frightening and after watching Broadfoot getting ripped apart by McGayday I really dont fancy him against Holland. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 who fuckin cares Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,775 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 who fuckin cares Why even bother posting that? If you don't like the thread, leave it. Don't post something ridicilous simply to bump up your post count. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_glasgow 2 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 _____________________________McGregor______________________________ ______________________Caldwell________McManus______________________ Hutton_____________________________________________________Naysmith ______________________Ferguson_______Fletcher________________________ Morrison___________________________________________________Commons ________________McCormack_________________________________________ __________________________Iwelumo__________________________________ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 _____________________________McGregor______________________________ ______________________Caldwell________McManus______________________ Hutton_____________________________________________________Naysmith ______________________Ferguson_______Fletcher________________________ Morrison___________________________________________________Commons ________________McCormack_________________________________________ __________________________Iwelumo__________________________________ if we put out that side we'l get ripped apart, no need to be so attacking minded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts