Rennie 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 Is papac fit yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alstone 374 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 i would fucking hate this to be a pish 0-0 draw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rennie 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 there will be goals!!! i can feel it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macka1990 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :boughera: :weir: :papac: :arron: :davis: :edu: :boyd: :lafferty: id be happy with that team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rennie 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :boughera: :weir: :papac: :arron: :davis: :edu: :boyd: :lafferty: id be happy with that team. arron on the right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :weir: :bougherra: :papac: :davis: :edu: :mendes: :boyd: :miller: / :velicka: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rennie 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :weir: :bougherra: :papac: :davis: :edu: :mendes: :boyd: :miller: / :velicka: id play that exept boyd and lafferty up front Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :weir: :bougherra: :papac: :davis: :edu: :mendes: :boyd: :miller: / :velicka: id play that exept boyd and lafferty up front Aye, forgot lafferty was back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macka1990 0 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :boughera: :weir: :papac: :arron: :davis: :edu: :boyd: :lafferty: id be happy with that team. arron on the right? i couldnt think of anyone else to play on the right and i want davis in the middle so ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 considering hes right footed i dont see what the problem is? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornelius11 74 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :weir: :bougherra: :papac: :davis: :edu: :mendes: :velicka: :boyd: :lafferty: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I think we should stick with the same team that has given us 6 wins in a row for a very long time. Why fuck things around when they don't need to be? Taking Velicka off, not only being a huge kick in the baws for him, could prove costly, as he is a proven goalscorer, anyone who says otherwise is seriously daft. Boydy is another issue, as we could use Miller or Lafferty up front to great effect instead of him, but who knows, right place, right time nd all that. I wouldn't change the midfield that much, keeping Novo for the 60thish minute seems sensible as he'll create problems for their defence. FINALLY, WE NEED A WIN, SMITH MUST KNOW THIS, WE WILL ACCEPT NOTHING LESS, LET'S BRING THE LEAGUE FLAG HOME!!!! that really did make me chuckle mate! Velicka is a proven goalscorer, so, boyd is what? I think its hard to change a winning team, however, I still view Velicka and Boyd as similar, with Boyd being better out the pair of them, similar with Lafferty and Miller, with Lafferty having more to him (especially composure) than Miller. Makes sense to start with 1 of each pairing, thus having different skills up front Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :weir: :bougherra: :papac: :davis: :edu: :mendes: :velicka: :boyd: :lafferty: To be honest, I would put Smith in for papac (because I dont like Papac mainly), and, I think that would worry the fuck out the times if we came out like that. Not sure about Velicka on the right of the 3 though, perhaps Miller? Would give us 2 pacy (ish) players who can drop wider, and, a finisher in the middle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 that really did make me chuckle mate! Velicka is a proven goalscorer, so, boyd is what? :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornelius11 74 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :weir: :bougherra: :papac: :davis: :edu: :mendes: :velicka: :boyd: :lafferty: To be honest, I would put Smith in for papac (because I dont like Papac mainly), and, I think that would worry the fuck out the times if we came out like that. Not sure about Velicka on the right of the 3 though, perhaps Miller? Would give us 2 pacy (ish) players who can drop wider, and, a finisher in the middle Good point. Although It would be in danger of becoming 4-5-1 and I really dont think we can beat celtic with that tactic. If the front 3 can push up as often as possible and bougherra pushes up towards the midfield like he can, then we should put a few goals away. Smith had a bit of a stinker against hearts, but I agree he would offer more width and a better option on the left flank than papac. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibleedblue 0 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 BBC gossip column says McManus may not play again this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 BBC gossip column says McManus may not play again this season. That's a pity, he's rank. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShootSpeedKillLight 0 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 BBC gossip column says McManus may not play again this season. That's a pity, he's rank. Worse than Loovens? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 BBC gossip column says McManus may not play again this season. That's a pity, he's rank. Worse than Loovens? It's a bit like picking your favourite strain of cancer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 BBC gossip column says McManus may not play again this season. That's a pity, he's rank. Worse than Loovens? It's a bit like picking your favourite strain of cancer. hahahahaha I am happier loovens is playing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_1 1,136 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 BBC gossip column says McManus may not play again this season. That's a pity, he's rank. Worse than Loovens? It's a bit like picking your favourite strain of cancer. hahahahaha I am happier loovens is playing TBH, Loovens is more of a threat from set-pieces so we need to get him marked up tightly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 k, i dont generally do this, but, I felt like it today! my team would be, :alexander: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :ssmith: :davis: :edu: :mendes: :novo::boyd: :lafferty: And just go for them! Lafferty and Novo give us goal threats, pace and trickery, with the options that they also tend to track back and wider. Davis tends to sit narrow anyway, so, that midfield 3 will happen naturally, and, should be able to control theirs For all their defensive frailties, Whittaker and Smith are both full backs that actually offer an attacking threat, and, good delivery (at times), with enough pace to get back. A small part of me would like Greegs back in the net, but, Alexander hasnt exactly performed badly, so, no REAL reason to drop him, plus, his distribution is better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMWWBK 0 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 BBC gossip column says McManus may not play again this season. That's a pity, he's rank. Worse than Loovens? It's a bit like picking your favourite strain of cancer. Totally agree with you, Iain. If McManus was fit he'd have partnered Loovens at the back with Caldwell in midfield. Now they'll probably bring Crosas into the middle which is ashame, because even though Crosas isnt that good, he's about 100x better than Caldwell. Only Strachan sees something in Caldwell as the holding midfielder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 BBC gossip column says McManus may not play again this season. That's a pity, he's rank. Worse than Loovens? It's a bit like picking your favourite strain of cancer. Totally agree with you, Iain. If McManus was fit he'd have partnered Loovens at the back with Caldwell in midfield. Now they'll probably bring Crosas into the middle which is ashame, because even though Crosas isnt that good, he's about 100x better than Caldwell. Only Strachan sees something in Caldwell as the holding midfielder. That looks most likely. While I don't often resort to condoning typical SPL tackles, a little cruncher on Croses early on should see him turn invisible for the rest of the game. I have absolutely no qualms whatsoever about Edu against Hartley. If I'm being honest, I can see it being embarrassingly in favour of our big American Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cumbria_blue 51 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 k, i dont generally do this, but, I felt like it today! my team would be, :alexander: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :ssmith: :davis: :edu: :mendes: :novo: :boyd: :lafferty: And just go for them! Lafferty and Novo give us goal threats, pace and trickery, with the options that they also tend to track back and wider. Davis tends to sit narrow anyway, so, that midfield 3 will happen naturally, and, should be able to control theirs For all their defensive frailties, Whittaker and Smith are both full backs that actually offer an attacking threat, and, good delivery (at times), with enough pace to get back. A small part of me would like Greegs back in the net, but, Alexander hasnt exactly performed badly, so, no REAL reason to drop him, plus, his distribution is better. I would like that team. When Smith and Whittaker push forward we would have big Edu to cover for them also Novo and Lafferty would help out the defensive side of things by playing in the channels and holding the ball up. I'd be mega-confident if that team was put out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts