Briton 394 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 [ Yes the truth hurts sometimes, maybe its not the case but how can you justify playing a keeper who is 20% match fit can be better than a fullly fit prospect, ive heard from a good source that Walter Smith escalated the training schedule for klos by 2 weeks rather than play Robinson on the Bench, doesnt give Robinson much confidence should he be called upon.Yes i'm a fan of Rangers but no fan of smiths man management.I'm no fan of Smith and I think he is wary of bringing youngsters through but there was abbsolutely no need of that shite regarding Catholics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearwhocares 0 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 can they not play him in durranty's team?put robinson on the bench for first team.Unfortunately Walter Numpty Smith doesn't have any time for Robinson despite him being probably one of the most consistent players for the reserves.maybe he doesn't like English Catholics?Out of order I believe. Explain why you would call the manager a numpty ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbren 0 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 [ Yes the truth hurts sometimes, maybe its not the case but how can you justify playing a keeper who is 20% match fit can be better than a fullly fit prospect, ive heard from a good source that Walter Smith escalated the training schedule for klos by 2 weeks rather than play Robinson on the Bench, doesnt give Robinson much confidence should he be called upon.Yes i'm a fan of Rangers but no fan of smiths man management.I'm no fan of Smith and I think he is wary of bringing youngsters through but there was abbsolutely no need of that shite regarding Catholics.If you can confirm other, then thats fine by me but can you give me any other reason. If hes not good enough then letizi should not have been released, Smith has no problem giving other outfield youngsters a try.You don't make someone that they are not good enough even when someone is injured i front of you then expect him to come in and do a job for you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briton 394 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 [ Yes the truth hurts sometimes, maybe its not the case but how can you justify playing a keeper who is 20% match fit can be better than a fullly fit prospect, ive heard from a good source that Walter Smith escalated the training schedule for klos by 2 weeks rather than play Robinson on the Bench, doesnt give Robinson much confidence should he be called upon.Yes i'm a fan of Rangers but no fan of smiths man management.I'm no fan of Smith and I think he is wary of bringing youngsters through but there was abbsolutely no need of that shite regarding Catholics.If you can confirm other, then thats fine by me but can you give me any other reason. If hes not good enough then letizi should not have been released, Smith has no problem giving other outfield youngsters a try.You don't make someone that they are not good enough even when someone is injured i front of you then expect him to come in and do a job for you.If I can confirm what? Are you seriously suggesting that it's because of his religion? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbren 0 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 [ Yes the truth hurts sometimes, maybe its not the case but how can you justify playing a keeper who is 20% match fit can be better than a fullly fit prospect, ive heard from a good source that Walter Smith escalated the training schedule for klos by 2 weeks rather than play Robinson on the Bench, doesnt give Robinson much confidence should he be called upon.Yes i'm a fan of Rangers but no fan of smiths man management.I'm no fan of Smith and I think he is wary of bringing youngsters through but there was abbsolutely no need of that shite regarding Catholics.If you can confirm other, then thats fine by me but can you give me any other reason. If hes not good enough then letizi should not have been released, Smith has no problem giving other outfield youngsters a try.You don't make someone that they are not good enough even when someone is injured i front of you then expect him to come in and do a job for you.If I can confirm what? Are you seriously suggesting that it's because of his religion?Don't know, but I have heard that he is old school, be interesting to see which others similar have played under him.Strange how Robinson seems to of been previously regarded highly and now not even good enough for the bench when the only option is a partially fit keeper who finishes his carrer in 3 months.Its already been mentioned that he struggled. Why embarrass Klos by playing him partially fit when he has been superb while playing fully fit. people have short memories Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briton 394 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 [ Yes the truth hurts sometimes, maybe its not the case but how can you justify playing a keeper who is 20% match fit can be better than a fullly fit prospect, ive heard from a good source that Walter Smith escalated the training schedule for klos by 2 weeks rather than play Robinson on the Bench, doesnt give Robinson much confidence should he be called upon.Yes i'm a fan of Rangers but no fan of smiths man management.I'm no fan of Smith and I think he is wary of bringing youngsters through but there was abbsolutely no need of that shite regarding Catholics.If you can confirm other, then thats fine by me but can you give me any other reason. If hes not good enough then letizi should not have been released, Smith has no problem giving other outfield youngsters a try.You don't make someone that they are not good enough even when someone is injured i front of you then expect him to come in and do a job for you.If I can confirm what? Are you seriously suggesting that it's because of his religion?Don't know, but I have heard that he is old school, be interesting to see which others similar have played under him.Strange how Robinson seems to of been previously regarded highly and now not even good enough for the bench when the only option is a partially fit keeper who finishes his carrer in 3 months.Its already been mentioned that he struggled. Why embarrass Klos by playing him partially fit when he has been superb while playing fully fit. people have short memoriesI think you are barking TBO and that is an uncalled for slander on Smith. BTW...what religion is Klos? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbren 0 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 [ Yes the truth hurts sometimes, maybe its not the case but how can you justify playing a keeper who is 20% match fit can be better than a fullly fit prospect, ive heard from a good source that Walter Smith escalated the training schedule for klos by 2 weeks rather than play Robinson on the Bench, doesnt give Robinson much confidence should he be called upon.Yes i'm a fan of Rangers but no fan of smiths man management.I'm no fan of Smith and I think he is wary of bringing youngsters through but there was abbsolutely no need of that shite regarding Catholics.If you can confirm other, then thats fine by me but can you give me any other reason. If hes not good enough then letizi should not have been released, Smith has no problem giving other outfield youngsters a try.You don't make someone that they are not good enough even when someone is injured i front of you then expect him to come in and do a job for you.If I can confirm what? Are you seriously suggesting that it's because of his religion?Don't know, but I have heard that he is old school, be interesting to see which others similar have played under him.Strange how Robinson seems to of been previously regarded highly and now not even good enough for the bench when the only option is a partially fit keeper who finishes his carrer in 3 months.Its already been mentioned that he struggled. Why embarrass Klos by playing him partially fit when he has been superb while playing fully fit. people have short memoriesI think you are barking TBO and that is an uncalled for slander on Smith. BTW...what religion is Klos?Its not Slander just an opinion, Whats happened to freedom of Speech. Just look back at discussions when Robinson came off the bench against hearts. People alledgedly left early in disgust because he blessed himself if I remember correctly.Ok Smith wasn't one of them but theres plenty around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briton 394 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 Its not Slander just an opinion, Whats happened to freedom of Speech. Just look back at discussions when Robinson came off the bench against hearts. People alledgedly left early in disgust because he blessed himself if I remember correctly.Ok Smith wasn't one of them but theres plenty around.You have freedom of speech...no problem. You are using that freedom to slander Smith. Whether people left early or not when Robinson crossed himself coming on to the pitch is neither here nor there. BTW...you didn't answer the question...what religion is Klos? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadaready 9,437 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 Given that McGregor will be suspended for our next UEFA cup game, should Klos play against Hibs to gain some match practice? Who do we have as cover to be on the bench for our next European game?A no brainer here. He has to play! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 Disagree CR. The 2nd spot in the SPL is the MOST important thing for us and we need McGregor in goal.Thats a no brainer IMO.Klos can get plenty of practice in training if need be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,219 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 [ Yes the truth hurts sometimes, maybe its not the case but how can you justify playing a keeper who is 20% match fit can be better than a fullly fit prospect, ive heard from a good source that Walter Smith escalated the training schedule for klos by 2 weeks rather than play Robinson on the Bench, doesnt give Robinson much confidence should he be called upon.Yes i'm a fan of Rangers but no fan of smiths man management.I'm no fan of Smith and I think he is wary of bringing youngsters through but there was abbsolutely no need of that shite regarding Catholics.If you can confirm other, then thats fine by me but can you give me any other reason. If hes not good enough then letizi should not have been released, Smith has no problem giving other outfield youngsters a try.You don't make someone that they are not good enough even when someone is injured i front of you then expect him to come in and do a job for you.If I can confirm what? Are you seriously suggesting that it's because of his religion?Don't know, but I have heard that he is old school, be interesting to see which others similar have played under him.Strange how Robinson seems to of been previously regarded highly and now not even good enough for the bench when the only option is a partially fit keeper who finishes his carrer in 3 months.Its already been mentioned that he struggled. Why embarrass Klos by playing him partially fit when he has been superb while playing fully fit. people have short memoriesI think you are barking TBO and that is an uncalled for slander on Smith. BTW...what religion is Klos?Its not Slander just an opinion, Whats happened to freedom of Speech. Just look back at discussions when Robinson came off the bench against hearts. People alledgedly left early in disgust because he blessed himself if I remember correctly.Ok Smith wasn't one of them but theres plenty around.THOUSANDS LEAVE EARLY EVERY WEEK.!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbren 0 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 [ Yes the truth hurts sometimes, maybe its not the case but how can you justify playing a keeper who is 20% match fit can be better than a fullly fit prospect, ive heard from a good source that Walter Smith escalated the training schedule for klos by 2 weeks rather than play Robinson on the Bench, doesnt give Robinson much confidence should he be called upon.Yes i'm a fan of Rangers but no fan of smiths man management.I'm no fan of Smith and I think he is wary of bringing youngsters through but there was abbsolutely no need of that shite regarding Catholics.If you can confirm other, then thats fine by me but can you give me any other reason. If hes not good enough then letizi should not have been released, Smith has no problem giving other outfield youngsters a try.You don't make someone that they are not good enough even when someone is injured i front of you then expect him to come in and do a job for you.If I can confirm what? Are you seriously suggesting that it's because of his religion?Don't know, but I have heard that he is old school, be interesting to see which others similar have played under him.Strange how Robinson seems to of been previously regarded highly and now not even good enough for the bench when the only option is a partially fit keeper who finishes his carrer in 3 months.Its already been mentioned that he struggled. Why embarrass Klos by playing him partially fit when he has been superb while playing fully fit. people have short memoriesI think you are barking TBO and that is an uncalled for slander on Smith. BTW...what religion is Klos?Its not Slander just an opinion, Whats happened to freedom of Speech. Just look back at discussions when Robinson came off the bench against hearts. People alledgedly left early in disgust because he blessed himself if I remember correctly.Ok Smith wasn't one of them but theres plenty around.THOUSANDS LEAVE EARLY EVERY WEEK.!!!Try Reading the threads associated with the incident then comment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbren 0 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Its not Slander just an opinion, Whats happened to freedom of Speech. Just look back at discussions when Robinson came off the bench against hearts. People alledgedly left early in disgust because he blessed himself if I remember correctly.Ok Smith wasn't one of them but theres plenty around.You have freedom of speech...no problem. You are using that freedom to slander Smith. Whether people left early or not when Robinson crossed himself coming on to the pitch is neither here nor there. BTW...you didn't answer the question...what religion is Klos?I don't know the religion of Klos and I am not sure how to finf out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 There's every chance UEFA will over-turn the refs sending off decision,so it's probably too early to worry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 PBThere is no chance UEFA will over turn the refs decision...it can only be done in cases of mistaken identity.Klos has to play now...he is ring rusty...he needs to familaiarise himself with our back 4....its hard on AM...but it will be a lesson well learned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 PBThere is no chance UEFA will over turn the refs decision...it can only be done in cases of mistaken identity.Klos has to play now...he is ring rusty...he needs to familaiarise himself with our back 4....its hard on AM...but it will be a lesson well learned.How come D'artagnan if the guy is innocent?and wouldn't it then be futile for the club to challenge the sending-off? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 505 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Can I just say that I never seen one Rangers fan leave when because of Lee Robinson's religion. I've have never head any Rangers fan make negative comments about his religion or his place of birth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paisley1967 11 Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 papac played good in the falkirk game first time i have seen him play at center half. will be a good back up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbren 0 Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 Can I just say that I never seen one Rangers fan leave when because of Lee Robinson's religion. I've have never head any Rangers fan make negative comments about his religion or his place of birth.As I said previously read the threads which applied to the incident after the game was played Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albahighlander 0 Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 First Smith will have no difficulty with anyone's religion - he could deliver mass in latin in the dre3ssing room twelve times a day and it would not affect Smith - utter nonsenseKlos playing ornot will determine how im portant the UEFA is to Smith.If he plays, we are taking it seriously, if he doesn't we are not.Personally I would play him, I don't think Smith will, although you can bet Gretna or somebody will have an ionvite to Murray park for a close door game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nifco 9 Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 Someone who does not train should not play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albahighlander 0 Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 Someone who does not train should not playThat was then, this is now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nifco 9 Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 Someone who does not train should not playThat was then, this is nowBut was he training before he got the call to play on thursdayanyone on the bench should be match fit, he could hardly take a goal kick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albahighlander 0 Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 Someone who does not train should not playThat was then, this is nowBut was he training before he got the call to play on thursdayanyone on the bench should be match fit, he could hardly take a goal kickyes, he is training with the teamhe has never been able to kick the ball particularly well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nifco 9 Posted February 25, 2007 Share Posted February 25, 2007 Someone who does not train should not playThat was then, this is nowBut was he training before he got the call to play on thursdayanyone on the bench should be match fit, he could hardly take a goal kickyes, he is training with the teamhe has never been able to kick the ball particularly wellNot having a goLast thing i heard he refused to play for the swifts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts