ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 2-0 Rangers.Davis and Jelavic will up their game big style. Lafferty usually shows up against Celtic aswell.2-0. Rangers 3/1 at most bookies now to win, im sticking a wager on it! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithgersbear 3,225 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 I would fancy Bartley at CB to do a job on Samaras or Hooper. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 Mckay has showed nothing to show hes worthy of a start against Celtic, seems to get better the less he plays. Davis and Edu center mid, Aluko and Wylde on the wings, lafferty and jelavic upfront. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 I would fancy Bartley at CB to do a job on Samaras or Hooper.Bartley will take care of samaras, and boca will do hooper.Never been so confident going into an old firm game! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeirFleckNRothen 1,789 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 I would fancy Bartley at CB to do a job on Samaras or Hooper.I'd like to think you're right, but Bartley hasn't played a lot of football and barring leathering Brown, he was poor at Parkhead last season.I hope you're right, but. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithgersbear 3,225 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 Bartley has great potential. Aggressive, good in the air, pretty quick and with the right guidance could be a fantastic CB. We need him and the whole team to get stuck into them. And if we do that, we can win. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamMunny 3,234 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 Mckay has showed nothing to show hes worthy of a start against Celtic, seems to get better the less he plays. Davis and Edu center mid, Aluko and Wylde on the wings, lafferty and jelavic upfront.Agree. Let's just get at them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 We forget Scott Brown is back in the mix for Celtic, they'll be playing ki or kayal out of position to accomodate this wanker.When was the last time we lost 2 on the bounce? we'll fuckin pump this mob Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.E.C. 18,768 Posted December 25, 2011 Author Share Posted December 25, 2011 I'd like to think you're right, but Bartley hasn't played a lot of football and barring leathering Brown, he was poor at Parkhead last season.I hope you're right, but.He got booked after 2 minutes and was completely anonymous after that tackle. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 Papac and Bartley at centre-half in an Old Firm game terrifies me.I can see why you've got them there, but Bocanegra has to be at centre-half. We only need half a player beside him because he'll walk and talk any defensive partner through a game.Yes I do agree ,but we really have a RB problem that has to be sorted before Wed.IMO .But I would put young McMillan in there before Broadfoot or Whittaker . It has to be fixed as we are constantly losing Goals from that Position.We desperately need to shore that area up. Bartley I feel would do ok ,but I do see the problem , Inexperience is an issue with him.Edu at RB, dont know about that . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeirFleckNRothen 1,789 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 McMillan has only started one league game for us and is too old for the under-19s, so he's another who isn't match fit, nor up to scratch with play.Throwing him into an Old Firm game at the Paedodome is a risk I don't think we should take.Whittaker will start, no doubt about it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 If the BBC are correct and an appeal is to be lodged does that make Jig available for the game, if so he is a cert to start. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoniram 1,919 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 There will be no McKay or Bendiksen or McMillan on Wednesday. There will be no curve ball as his whole team selection will centre round how to stop them. They will also appeal the McCulloch sending off to make sure he plays as well.Look out for a team not too dissimilar to yesterday because McCoist doesn't learn lessons. All left sided with no protection for the worst full back in Scottish football.Only two changes I see from yesterday will be Bartley for Goian and Aluko for Wylde.Same result as yesterday as this team looks gone, deflated and bereft of ideas and confidence. Watch their attacks concentrate on Whittaker as he is our weak link.Either Forrest or Samaras will be directly against him and dont be surprised if Imaqueer plays at left back to further expose our weakest link.Oh and watch Collum ( like a fair few refs already this season) give us nothing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 Must attack, must play 442. We can win this! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbo 588 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 :McGregor::Whittaker: :Bartley: :Papac::Aluko: :Davis: :Edu: :Wylde::Jelavic: :Lafferty:Go put the bastards back in their place Rangers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raff1690 25 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 Fully expect to see:McGregor Whittaker Broadfoot Bocanegra PapacBartleyWylde Davis Edu WallaceJelavicHowever I agree with your line up, bar Whittaker. Detest the sight of him.This will be the team.No way in hell it should be however this what i believe Ally will go for Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rab_Rangers 38 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 I'd go with McGregorBroadfoot Perry Bocanegra WallaceAluko Davis Edu McKayLafferty Jelavic Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 There will be no McKay or Bendiksen or McMillan on Wednesday. There will be no curve ball as his whole team selection will centre round how to stop them. They will also appeal the McCulloch sending off to make sure he plays as well.Look out for a team not too dissimilar to yesterday because McCoist doesn't learn lessons. All left sided with no protection for the worst full back in Scottish football.Only two changes I see from yesterday will be Bartley for Goian and Aluko for Wylde.Same result as yesterday as this team looks gone, deflated and bereft of ideas and confidence. Watch their attacks concentrate on Whittaker as he is our weak link.Either Forrest or Samaras will be directly against him and dont be surprised if Imaqueer plays at left back to further expose our weakest link.Oh and watch Collum ( like a fair few refs already this season) give us nothing.If he Plays this way we are beat, however if he changes things, and Plays an attack minded Team ,we will beat them.I am concerned about Ally's Tactical decision making or Lack of it and he isn't getting any help from the rest of the Coaching Team.Sit back and we will be exposed and they will run away with this one.Whittaker must not start.IMO .Do us all a favour Ally . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassaaaa 11,406 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 You are barking mad if you think McCoist is going to play any kind of attacking football on Wednesday .Its going to be a backs to the wall and play for a draw , just like his master used to play ......... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,656 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 You are barking mad if you think McCoist is going to play any kind of attacking football on Wednesday .Its going to be a backs to the wall and play for a draw , just like his master used to play .........but was successful in playing that way as his trophy haul would suggest Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassaaaa 11,406 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 but was successful in playing that way as his trophy haul would suggestGood on you if thats how you like to watch football............ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,656 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 Good on you if thats how you like to watch football............so youve just came into this thread to have a pop at walter smith........ good on you if you want to support your team that way. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassaaaa 11,406 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 so youve just came into this thread to have a pop at walter smith........ good on you if you want to support your team that way.I am having a go at McCoist for being a clone of WS in every way , and thats why there is no way he will play attacking football just like Smith done in the past .He is obviously not learning and ultimately will lose his job because he either cannot or will not change . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,656 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 I am having a go at McCoist for being a clone of WS in every way , and thats why there is no way he will play attacking football just like Smith done in the past .He is obviously not learning and ultimately will lose his job because he either cannot or will not change .yet it never done WS any harm, did he lose his job playing that way.... winning trophiesout of curiosity in all the years we won the title being negative and boring, how many years did the team finishing runners up score more goals? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryHurlock 21 Posted December 25, 2011 Share Posted December 25, 2011 yet it never done WS any harm, did he lose his job playing that way.... winning trophiesout of curiosity in all the years we won the title being negative and boring, how many years did the team finishing runners up score more goals?Ano its fun proving him wrong but you do know he will try keep this argument going anyway that he can, does it in every thread its as though he just likes being totally opposite. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.