govanblue 16,847 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Aye of course.But if someone goes against something you believe in you stand up for yourself, right?You've nailed it! For yourself - not for the best interests of the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampionsAgain 1,373 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 What's best for the Club? Shouldn't that be the first question? Not what's best for individuals or what they want.Re-naming Ibrox is not what is best for the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKingObv 10,639 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Re-naming Ibrox is not what is best for the club.How not? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Re-naming Ibrox is not what is best for the club.Maximizing our revenue streams is. If you can't see that then you've been under a rock for a very long time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Re-naming Ibrox is not what is best for the club.Green has won certain fans over, he now has a free reign to do as he pleases with our club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Re-naming Ibrox is not what is best for the club.so what else will bring in this supposedly 2.5m a season.And why does extra money not benefit us Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Green has won certain fans over, he now has a free reign to do as he pleases with our club.Bollocks.We are now a plc, and I and others can easily vote him out if we're not happy with his performance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Bollocks.We are now a plc, and I and others can easily vote him out if we're not happy with his performance.Bollocks, Charlie isn't going anywhere yet and we both know it no matter what he does to please or annoy fans. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampionsAgain 1,373 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 How not?Decisions like this divide the support, Not exactly what we need right now is it? Still clinging on to the hope that this isnt true. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Green has won certain fans over, he now has a free reign to do as he pleases with our club.bollocks its a plc not a dictatorship Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Bollocks, Charlie isn't going anywhere yet and we both know it no matter what he does to please or annoy fans.It's not up to the fans - it's up to us shareholders.If we want him out, he's out.We don't want him out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 bollocks its a plc not a dictatorship Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 It's not up to the fans - it's up to us shareholders.If we want him out, he's out.We don't want him out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChampionsAgain 1,373 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Maximizing our revenue streams is. If you can't see that then you've been under a rock for a very long time.Re-naming our home isnt the way to maximize revenue either. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Decisions like this divide the support, Not exactly what we need right now is it?Still clinging on to the hope that this isnt true.Not really a divide. The majority can understand the reasoning for leasing the naming rights of our stadium for profit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govanblue 16,847 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 :lol:And thus I win. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Re-naming our home isnt the way to maximize revenue either.It's certainly a good way. If the figures are correct, it is fantastic money for the level we find ourselves right now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
legalbeagle 3,734 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Re-naming Ibrox is not what is best for the club.Thank God we have you, probably better if we don't bother to discuss issues on here anymore. If we just ask you, then we will find out the right answer, unequivocally, without fail. Thank God for our moral compass being here to tell us what is best for the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 :lol:And thus I win. Was it a competition? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Will Follow Rangers 12,917 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Re-naming Ibrox is not what is best for the club.what about adding a prefix to it for a set period for a large sum of money?after all we changed its suffix after 98 years from park to stadium without any fuss, or large sum of money Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Re-naming our home isnt the way to maximize revenue either.Obviously not. As this isn't proven true yet. But, if there is a deal where by we are offered £2.5 million a season for 3 seasons then it clearly is. Unless you have another way to raise that money? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 :lol:And thus I win.When debating with an idiot there are only ever losers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeirFleckNRothen 1,789 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Decisions like this divide the support, Not exactly what we need right now is it?Still clinging on to the hope that this isnt true.Is this your basis to support your argument? It divides support? Aye, the logical ones and the fantasists.Charles Green can rename Ibrox 'The ALDI Arena' for all I care. This time last season, we were one month and one day away from not even having a pot to piss in and now, maximising our earning potential is an issue because you're emotionally attached to a name?Honestly, some people need to take a step back and look at it from a logical perspective. It's frightening how some people think and even more worryingly, what they forget. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedtheted 20 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Green has won certain fans over, he now has a free reign to do as he pleases with our club.Dont talk rubbish mate,CG will do whats best for Rangers.End of. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 Dont talk rubbish mate,CG will do whats best for Rangers.End of. Shut up ffs. He will do what is best for him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.