WCPRANGERS1 2,997 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 I'm going to court, force the club to defend itself in the action thereby incurring legal fees, then If I win I will then take the money from the club .... & give it back to the club Can someone please tell me the logic in this ??Exactly this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Fuxsake...."Chris is a journalist"????This is getting better by the page."In this context". I was as careful in putting that in as you were in ignoring it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 "In this context". I was as careful in putting that in as you were in ignoring it.OK, I'll be careful in my reworded response then."Chris is a journalist??? Fuxsake, are you taking the piss??" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue and True 311 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Yes, I can see why you would be so happy at a billionaire shareholder, concerned at the value of his meagre investment, refusing to put money into the club while demanding his friends join the board immediately. indeed.well its better than the circus currently in town........or do you prefer the guys that sue us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 505 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Unfortunately, Chris has found himself in a position where he may have to prove Ahmad is not telling the truth. Was it really worth it just to spread a story online?I think you'll find Imran is the one that wants to prove Rangers were wrong to sack him - or more importantly haven't given him his cut. Ahmad isn't someone I'd trust myself but you bash on. We'll see when this court action takes place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Whether Ahmad has a legal case or not it's a terrible thing to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainofIndustry 921 Posted August 13, 2013 Author Share Posted August 13, 2013 well its better than the circus currently in town........or do you prefer the guys that sue us?That's the choice, is it? So the only two parties who are allowed to run Rangers are the ones leaking to the Daily Record on one side and the ones leaking to the Sun & the BBC on the other? Take your pick: Stalin or Hitler. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 No posts from Bawsburst for a while. Anyone know why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue and True 311 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 That's the choice, is it? So the only two parties who are allowed to run Rangers are the ones leaking to the Daily Record on one side and the ones leaking to the Sun & the BBC on the other? Take your pick: Stalin or Hitler.well it is the choice at the moment.......unless you can advise of a 3rd party? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 505 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Whether Ahmad has a legal case or not it's a terrible thing to do.What is?Asking the question whether or not a club employee is posting sensitive information on a forum? That's all TRS did. I, for one, am glad such a person is no longer on the board. I'm surprised a few people are defending this behaviour but that's the beauty of opinion I guess... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 No posts from Bawsburst for a while. Anyone know why?died of embarrassment? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 That's the choice, is it? So the only two parties who are allowed to run Rangers are the ones leaking to the Daily Record on one side and the ones leaking to the Sun & the BBC on the other? Take your pick: Stalin or Hitler.What group of "real Rangers men" is backing the Pol Pot side? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainofIndustry 921 Posted August 13, 2013 Author Share Posted August 13, 2013 I think you'll find Imran is the one that wants to prove Rangers were wrong to sack him - or more importantly haven't given him his cut.Ahmad isn't someone I'd trust myself but you bash on. We'll see when this court action takes place.I'm bashing precisely nothing and I don't understand why you would suggest I trust Ahmad? If Chris is comfortable being named in a lawsuit against Rangers, great. Personally, I'd be worried sick. You don't seem as rational on this debate as you normally do, Frankie. Has something or someone upset you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 What is?Asking the question whether or not a club employee is posting sensitive information on a forum? That's all TRS did. I, for one, am glad such a person is no longer on the board. I'm surprised a few people are defending this behaviour but that's the beauty of opinion I guess...I think he meant that suing the club is a terrible thing to do. Hope so anyway! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 What is?Asking the question whether or not a club employee is posting sensitive information on a forum? That's all TRS did. I, for one, am glad such a person is no longer on the board. I'm surprised a few people are defending this behaviour but that's the beauty of opinion I guess...Suing us I meant, sorry for not being clear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weird_Beard 99 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 No posts from Bawsburst for a while. Anyone know why?Take your pick. He was busy writing a blog or busy dealing with PR requests from other parties. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Bill, we know you read this and can i ask you to ask Ahmad the following:1) Who is Charlotte fakeovers2) Why are you sending them emails about lawsuits3) Given that you know who they are and that they are potentially harming our club, and you, why are you communicating with him or her4) Is Craig Whyte working with them in cahoots. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Bill, we know you read this and can i ask you to ask Ahmad the following:1) Who is Charlotte fakeovers2) Why are you sending them emails about lawsuits3) Given that you know who they are and that they are potentially harming our club, and you, why are you communicating with him or her4) Is Craig Whyte working with them in cahoots.Craig Whyte!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fools Gold 488 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Meanwhile on planet Earth...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHB 63 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Ahmad is looking for a pay-out. It is as simple as that. And, unless Chris Graham is loaded, he is not going to waste his money going after him. Frankie 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 505 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 I'm bashing precisely nothing and I don't understand why you would suggest I trust Ahmad? If Chris is comfortable being named in a lawsuit against Rangers, great. Personally, I'd be worried sick. You don't seem as rational on this debate as you normally do, Frankie. Has something or someone upset you?I'm perfectly rational.I'm comfortable that no laws were broken by Chris or TRS. I also doubt any legal action will go ahead. Fury 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 505 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Ahmad is looking for a pay-out. It is as simple as that. And, unless Chris Graham is loaded, he is not going to waste his money going after him.More rational comments. It may catch on...! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Bill, we know you read this and can i ask you to ask Ahmad the following:1) Who is Charlotte fakeovers2) Why are you sending them emails about lawsuits3) Given that you know who they are and that they are potentially harming our club, and you, why are you communicating with him or her4) Is Craig Whyte working with them in cahoots.He won't answer number one. He'd have to sue himself, then give himself back his damages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stfu 596 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 All of these clown will be off soon enough, this is just one last attempt to get as much as they can from the club before they leave.We can only hope that when they are gone we do not get the tanned buffoon back again.We should be very careful what we wish for.And for the record Frank Blin would be an incredible addition to our board if we got him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 I'm perfectly rational.I'm comfortable that no laws were broken by Chris or TRS. I also doubt any legal action will go ahead.Did the DayGlo glove guy take legal advice before he went public.....or was that an afterthought? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts