Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
CaptainofIndustry

Imran hits back via Bill McMurdo

Recommended Posts


I'd say this proves my point from the locked CG thread. Chris isn't a neutral observer in this debate any longer, he's an active participant. This is serious stuff. Chris would be well advised to heed Walt White's words to Hank in Breaking Bad: tread lightly.

All of that could apply to McMurdo, no?
Rangers Lady likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two questions for Bill:

1. What contracts will result in Rangers getting £67m over the next five years?

2. Does IA intend to 'invest' in the club by donating his 'settlement' back to the club or by using the money to buy more shares for himself on the open market?

gogzy, OlegKuznetsov and quabba like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the funniest blog from Bill in ages!. This is an absolute peach!

What sort of crackpot sues a company, but says don't worry because he'll give the money back to the company? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

67m plus 22m plus at least 14 m ST plus a sum for sponsorship, how come we only have 10m in the bank, is someone telling porkies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No way this idiot McMurdo is a Rangers fan. He looks a total idiot supporting these crooks Green and Ahmed. Anyone who supports these two are fucking idiots. I am not saying McColl or King is the answer but I do know Green and his pals are crooks like Whyte who will cripple Rangers.

I dont think I emphasised the word idiot enough :7325:

What proof do you have that Green and Ahmad are crooks? Interesting that you dont use this term for King. Sums it up really

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

67m plus 22m plus at least 14 m ST plus a sum for sponsorship, how come we only have 10m in the bank, is someone telling porkies.

I think the clue was in the statement where it said over the next 5 -10 years

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Ahmed is suing us for £3.4 million then going to re-invest?

What a pack of lies!

The interesting thing is they have now admitted him and Green are in cahoots to sue the club. Remember, even on the day we went into admin Whyte was still spouting lis about the club's finacial position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who to believe.

One thing that still doesn't sit well with me is the way the IamRangers situation was dealt with and basically wanted admin on here to break DPA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotta to say without taking sides at present, what if there is an element of truth in the figures for the next 5 to 10 years, seems an awful lot of folk more eager to believe we are going back into admin than acknowledge that things maybe while not ideal aren't as black as some would have us believe.

Bears r us and Rfc#1. like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2. Does IA intend to 'invest' in the club by donating his 'settlement' back to the club or by using the money to buy more shares for himself on the open market?

I think we know the answer to this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what he actually means is , I'll sue Rangers for a load of money , then buy myself more shares , to make a profit off of for myself , not the Club

Aye nae danger IamLier

Yeah this is what he wants to do, get more share and get closer to a controlling stake...... Using our season ticket money.

.......hmmmm heard this one before!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I canae help but fucking laugh at tis tbh

He confirmed the story is true that the club owes him money and he is regrettably taking this action

:lol:

Regrettably :lol:

Nae fucking danger, if I didn't laugh I'd cry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If IA is talking of buying himself more shares can we assume that he wasn't the one getting rid of his shares yesterday then?

Suppose given the smell of bullshit coming from the rest of the statement it would be foolish to assume anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...