Zappa 358 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 So the company is in good health?We should start a Bring Back Chuck campaign! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Fair enough on the player sales, had failed to consider these.Ill give you that one Does the fact we now have a squad that must be valued above £10M-£15M come into the picture? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho_nacho_man 477 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Taking into account the quantified salaries, including bonus for first team players and directors / key personnel.We're spending £5.146m on the remaining 157 employees. On average this works out at £32,777 approx per person...It would have been interesting to find out the allocated wage resource on our coaching staff (bar Ally).Edit: Happy to be proved wrong though! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 "management takes into account "...and:"The auditor should evaluate management's assessment of the entity's ability to continue as a going concern."So management need to look at the foreseeable future, not necessarily just 12 months (and in the case of a loss-making football club with lots of uncertainties, definitely not just 12 months!), and the auditors need to evaluate that assessment.You're up a gumtree without a paddle on this mixed-metaphorical exercise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cadman 342 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 No but i think a groundsman gets paid £15k per year, someone in the ticket office £10k. Unless we hired an extra couple of hundred people that figure seems extremely high to me.maybe there are things like employer pension schemes for each individual employee, performance bonuses for ordinary staff etc that have been paid over the year included in the costs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 No but i think a groundsman gets paid £15k per year, someone in the ticket office £10k. Unless we hired an extra couple of hundred people that figure seems extremely high to me.We employ nearly 150 people Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 i think the AGM should answer forward projections and a hint of current performance, hoping that this will finally nock the doubters in the heid once and for all, hope so anywayI don't think the directors are allowed to make such profit forecasts per stock exchange rules, although I agree we would all be interested in them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
five stars 1,636 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Anybody checked the share price today? When a company publishes its accounts, any change in the share prices can indicate what the city thinks of the figures. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuggy 1,308 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Page 10:"Whilst an operating loss of £14m was made on a turnover of £19.1m in the period, it will not be repeated this season. Turnover in retail this season isexpected to be much higher than the £1.6m received. Operational costs are now significantly lower than they were at the start of the period and additionalrevenue streams are being generated. In addition there were exceptional cash costs of £4.2m which will not be repeated."So was the WiFi, screens and other one-off upgrades included in this £14M operational cost? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 So the company is in good health?We should start a Bring Back Chuck campaign!Too rightHe's the man to bring in investment Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitre_mouldmaster 21,509 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 ...and:"The auditor should evaluate management's assessment of the entity's ability to continue as a going concern."So management need to look at the foreseeable future, not necessarily just 12 months (and in the case of a loss-making football club with lots of uncertainties, definitely not just 12 months!), and the auditors need to evaluate that assessment.You're up a gumtree without a paddle on this mixed-metaphorical exercise.God, I wish I had picked a source that was easier to cut and paste from!"Management may need to consider a wide range of factors relating to current and expected profitability, debt repayment schedules and potential sources of replacement financing before it can satisfy itself that the going concern basis is approporiate."i.e. they can encorporate the use of a bridging credit facility in the plan. Does not mean that the auditors are saying we will break even in 2014-2015."Since the degree of uncertainty associated with the outcome of an event or condition increases as the event or condition is further into the future, in considering suc hevents or conditions, the indications of going concern issues will need to be significant before the auditor considers taking further action"i.e. if the auditor feels the management could get a bridging finance package to tie them over till they get back to the top division and european revenue, then they would not challenge the self diagnosed 'going concern' declaration beyond that of the 12 months.There is nothing in the accounts saying or indicating that we will be 'break even' in the next 2 years. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 768 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Break even - was an opinion ! ! We are and have reduced costs - we will increase revenue and we will have no ( or different) one off costs - but as I said it's an opinionwe will have one off cost to refurbish edmiston and whatever is to happen with the carpark. we will also be looking for a transfer kitty not a one of cost but still needs to be worked in Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Yes, we can continue for the foreseeable future and certainly way beyond season ticket renewal date.This is all I needed to hear. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 This is all I needed to hear.Not everyone sadly gogzy, a brief glimpse at FF shows that the accounts are being spun into proving the doom mongers right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,504 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Page 10:"Whilst an operating loss of £14m was made on a turnover of £19.1m in the period, it will not be repeated this season. Turnover in retail this season isexpected to be much higher than the £1.6m received. Operational costs are now significantly lower than they were at the start of the period and additionalrevenue streams are being generated. In addition there were exceptional cash costs of £4.2m which will not be repeated."So was the WiFi, screens and other one-off upgrades included in this £14M operational cost?i thought that was certain payoffs to certain people Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Any idea now when the AGM will be ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,504 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Not everyone sadly gogzy, a brief glimpse at FF shows that the accounts are being spun into proving the doom mongers right.well dont forget that those across there planned on taking 16mill out of the figures for some reason so were fucked apparently Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 768 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Really?RetailSponsorshipTicket salesCorporateMediathey are all far lower than in the years before.tickets sales is fair enough with the reduction in price.Gate Receipts and hospitality £24.2mSponsorship and advertising £2.835mBroadcasting rights £5.133mCommercial £5.633mOther income £1.875mTotal £39.7m2013 wasGate Receipts and hospitality £13.2mSponsorship and advertising £0.8mBroadcasting rights £0.7mCommercial £0.9mOther income £1.705mTotal £19.1msponsorship and advertising down over 2mbroadcasting down £4.3mcommercial down £4mwhat is it you see in the accounts that are positive? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post gogzy 31,195 Posted October 1, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted October 1, 2013 Not everyone sadly gogzy, a brief glimpse at FF shows that the accounts are being spun into proving the doom mongers right.I didn't doubt that happening for a second mate.I was waiting on Boss, he is my man in the know when it comes to financial matters.If he is telling me we are not going bust, we own Ibrox and are solvent for the forseable future then I am happy at that. boss, Essandoh, Cadman and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,733 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 The clubs official photogropher earns 27k a year. He has 2 understudys or did it may be one now. Tbh I think that's a fair amount given the amounts photographers can make.I'm saying 27 it may be 21 but it's one if those 2 I just can't mind what he said Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisleybear1872 136 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I didn't doubt that happening for a second mate.I was waiting on Boss, he is my man in the know when it comes to financial matters.If he is telling me we are not going bust, we own Ibrox and are solvent for the forseable future then I am happy at that.I understand your feeling. But surely that is no where near the benchmark for a satisfactory boardroom? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Any idea now when the AGM will be ?Is it not 31st October? Halloween Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 they are all far lower than in the years before.tickets sales is fair enough with the reduction in price.Gate Receipts and hospitality £24.2mSponsorship and advertising £2.835mBroadcasting rights £5.133mCommercial £5.633mOther income £1.875mTotal £39.7m2013 wasGate Receipts and hospitality £13.2mSponsorship and advertising £0.8mBroadcasting rights £0.7mCommercial £0.9mOther income £1.705mTotal £19.1msponsorship and advertising down over 2mbroadcasting down £4.3mcommercial down £4mwhat is it you see in the accounts that are positive?Dropping four divisions was not the fault of the incumbent board. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I'm in the same boat. The accounts are as clear as mud to me. It doesn't help when you have dozens people on here playing amateur accountant, trying to pick them apart and put their own slant in. I have 3 questionsHow much money did we take in in total?How much money did we spend in total?What is our current balance?Listen to Boss mate, he isn't an "amateur". Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,733 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I didn't doubt that happening for a second mate.I was waiting on Boss, he is my man in the know when it comes to financial matters.If he is telling me we are not going bust, we own Ibrox and are solvent for the forseable future then I am happy at that.Indeed i would say the same, but I think it's also worth looking out for the law man and forlanssister providing input. Out of most those are the 3 who are seemingly well clued up.I did say no matter what the accounts turned out to be it will be spun on either side. This thread is proof of that.The results are better than I expected but still questions arise from these.Luckily I'm not clever enough to ask these questions but I'm sure others will. I still think they should go but I did point out why yesterday which had virtually nothing to do with accounts as I pointed out to you.I'm just wondering can this board really secure extra share money? Will institutional investors really invest again? That's my main worry but the accounts aren't too bad thankfully.Ftp Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.