sandyinroyalblue 16,478 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 As I've said a million times on the forum,why would he sign Boyd when his pal dalys there he's not going to drop him is he?Use your brain people!a million times in 1,331 posts is that possible? Sander2006 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fantana 28,894 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 If its about wages then I can't see United or the Sheep offering more than us.We're operating a new wage structure, the sheep probably could but the issue isn't the wage its that Ally's not interested it would seem Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,600 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 We're operating a new wage structure, the sheep probably could but the issue isn't the wage its that Ally's not interested it would seemNo they couldn't they are on their arse Financially. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgers 735 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Sack McCoist, we didn't want Boyd last week, we need him this week. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander2006 50 Posted June 15, 2014 Author Share Posted June 15, 2014 I think one of the most effective ways to get more season tickets sold is to sign Boyd. So Ally's not only damaging us on the field but also off it financially. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BlueSuedeSambas 53,700 Posted June 15, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted June 15, 2014 People on here are such drama queens General Custer, Albertz 78, And another thing... and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 768 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 first boyd has already stated kille have first refusual.two how can boyd or his agent assure wages wont b a problem when they dont know what we can affordthree we dont know if signing boyd can be achieved in the budget or if signing boyd would not leave enough for other targets 4 the budget was to be one out one in i imagine that has came way down with the season ticket sales being so low.Doubt very much we could afford him if he wants more than a grand a week. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1873bear 192 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 No quotes, pure fabrication. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I hope more than anything that this article is incorrect. However if Ally was interested in signing Boyd, he would have been signed a long time ago.Boyd has been under the knife in the closed season IIIRC. We couldn't sign him till he was able to take a medical AFAIK.The article has no quotes of substance and is based purely on guesswork. I hope it's wrong as I would love to see Boyd back, and I thik it would be a huge mistake not to sign him.I will adopt my wait and see tactic on this one before i slate Ally. Gerwelly and chipster 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EatDolphins 5,355 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Ffs calm down.I think ally is rank and shouldn't be in his job. But there's not one quote from him, his assistants or anyone at the club. And theres folk on here going raj at him. Folk treating it as fact.Show a bit of perspective and debate / criticise actuals not pish make believe /heresay.heresy's a bit strong Rfc#1. and SeparateEntityMyArse 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drenth 21 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 maybe in 2 years Ally will sign him, when he is that bit older Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Maybe just maybe ally has another player in mind for striker.Pish. Boyd is a cert to score at least 20 goals a season. You know what you will get with him and we could get another few years out of him. And he's a free agent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I saw that as well. The two of them were quite pally so that doesn't ring true for this story.As usual I'll wait and see when they are both back from holiday and it's announced officiallyBoyd is back from Holiday. He came back last week. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,435 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 The people that are furious when Ally signs older players, no sell on value, not looking to the future, only looks at ex players etc are some of the same posters who are now furious that he might not want to sign Boyd. If we do sign him they'll be furious because of all the things already mentioned as well as his extra wage.I've said before Boyd would have been my number 1 target but it's no great deal if we don't sign him. ArchibaldLeitch 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 The people that are furious when Ally signs older players, no sell on value, not looking to the future, only looks at ex players etc are some of the same posters who are now furious that he might not want to sign Boyd. If we do sign him they'll be furious because of all the things already mentioned as well as his extra wage.I've said before Boyd would have been my number 1 target but it's no great deal if we don't sign him.Furious because he would rather sign Jon Daly before he does Boyd. He brings back people like Steven Smith Ricky Foster but doesn't want to bring back Boyd?If Ally McCoist is going to bring back ex players at least sign the ones that are going to make the difference. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fantana 28,894 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 No they couldn't they are on their arse Financially.Apparently not as bad as you might think and i reckon they'd go all out for Boyd: Aberdeen have signed a new three-year sponsorship deal they claim could be worth a seven-figure sum.They have not revealed the exact value but say the agreement with oil services firm Saltire Energy extends beyond having its name on their shirts.Aberdeen vice-chairman George Yule said: "We are absolutely delighted to have secured this partnership with Saltire Energy."They are also going to support all of our youth development teams."The new sponsor will feature on the club's new home and away kits for next season.Through its "Saltire in the Community" programme, it is already involved with many sporting programmes, such as AFC Youth, The Paul Lawrie Foundation, Saltire Energy Sports for Schools, University of Aberdeen Sporting Scholarships and Curling for Schools.Now Saltire Energy's Mike Loggie was looking forward to building on his company's relationship with the club after their third-place finish in the Scottish Premiership and lifting of the Scottish League Cup."I am a long-standing fan of the club and admire the way they perform both on and off the pitch," he said."When we heard that there was an opportunity to become the official sponsor for AFC, we were keen to take over this prestigious title and strengthen our involvement with the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Where on earth are there quotes saying that Boyd has been offered, where on earth are the quotes from Boyd saying he would join us again, where on earth are the quotes from anyone that he has been snubbed by the club.“I don’t know if there is any interest from Rangers in signing Boydy or whether he wants to go back. But the supporters would love to see them link up again."Don't you think this one piece that is an actual quote totally contradicts the whole fucking story? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EatDolphins 5,355 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 The people that are furious when Ally signs older players, no sell on value, not looking to the future, only looks at ex players etc are some of the same posters who are now furious that he might not want to sign Boyd. If we do sign him they'll be furious because of all the things already mentioned as well as his extra wage.I've said before Boyd would have been my number 1 target but it's no great deal if we don't sign him.I never wanted either of them. But if we had to have one I'd take a 30 year old who scored 22 goals in the SPFL last season over a 34 yo who was released by a Canadian team and hasn't kicked a ball since. Band of Brothers 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Where on earth are there quotes saying that Boyd has been offered, where on earth are the quotes from Boyd saying he would join us again, where on earth are the quotes from anyone that he has been snubbed by the club.“I don’t know if there is any interest from Rangers in signing Boydy or whether he wants to go back. But the supporters would love to see them link up again."Don't you think this one piece that is an actual quote totally contradicts the whole fucking story?No because Ally has said on live TV that he hopes to sign Boyd. And Boyd has said he would like to come back. Why would Fleck know anything? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wearethepeople72 1,845 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Don't understand it at all. We sign Miller but not Boyd? Bizzare. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 No because Ally has said on live TV that he hopes to sign Boyd. And Boyd has said he would like to come back.Why would Fleck know anything?So why are you having a go at Ally as if the article is true? General Custer 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 No because Ally has said on live TV that he hopes to sign Boyd. And Boyd has said he would like to come back.Why would Fleck know anything?I'm talking about the actual story that totally contradicts itself, no quotes nothing from any other person, just what Fleck said total 100% pile of shite from another tabloid.And as was pointed out earlier Boyd has been for an operation on his ankle who is to say that if we are after him he would even pass a medical? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 boyd walked off during a final because he was too hot, then fucked off when he seen the dollar signs, theres plenty capable strikers available surely, just cause weve signed miller doesnt mean we need boyd Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 The Sunday Post haven't had their finger on the pulse since the 50's. I wish people wouldn't react to press speculation and, you know, wait for the facts to emerge. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Custer 516 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 No because Ally has said on live TV that he hopes to sign Boyd. And Boyd has said he would like to come back.Why would Fleck know anything?In your first post on this thread you're having a go at the manager for not making a decision based on what Fleck's supposed to have said then in this one you're asking why would Fleck know anything. Make your mind up ffs Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.