The Louden Tavern 1,765 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 1 hour ago, STEPPS BOY said: No we'll just call everyone who votes in favour "so called supporters". Your quote is not my quote, I never said people who voted no were @so called supporters ' read it right and not what you want to see RM Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Louden Tavern 1,765 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 2 hours ago, rbr said: Of course we will RM , but unlike the vast majority that don't use social media nor go on forums etc , we have read the proposal instead of just voting for a club legend because his names on the ballot , or voting because John Brown said it was a good idea in a paper. As an example there are 4 guys in my work who have voted and when I asked them what they had voted for I got 4 different answers , all completely different and all completely wrong , but that's just life . Can you tell me what their reasons were and why they were all completely wrong? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Louden Tavern 1,765 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Just now, The Louden Tavern said: Can you tell me what their reasons were and why they were all completely wrong? Was it not that they disagreed with your opinion? RM Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,762 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 11 minutes ago, The Louden Tavern said: Your quote is not my quote, I never said people who voted no were @so called supporters ' read it right and not what you want to see RM "I have no idea why so called Rangers fans would have a problem with an idea to get us all in the one group." You said it, think you made your feelings perfectly clear, tbh.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 364 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 7 minutes ago, The Louden Tavern said: Can you tell me what their reasons were and why they were all completely wrong? Varied reasons , 1 guy is a seaon ticket holder who thought he was automatically now a member of club1872 , he has never joined either the RST not RF , this guy travels home and away religiously but has no interest in the politics of fan ownership , he was pretty pissed when I explained he wasnt a member ., never bothered with the proposal and started quoting what ex players had been saying in the press Next voted Yes because Gough is his hero , never read the proposals , pays a £5 to RF every month. Next guy felt swayed by the wording of the question and didnt realise that this meant disbanding both groups to form a new one , again didnt read the proposal , also a season ticket holder whom didnt think he was getting anything . Lastly was another mate , lifetime member of the RST who had become completly fed up with the way the RST had been heading and in his words " fancied a change " Its only my opinion but I didnt see anything in their thinking to agree with their voting in that way , others will disagree . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,241 Posted March 27, 2016 Author Share Posted March 27, 2016 Hi All Yes 10 No 13 Voted No as per majority. Note that out of everyone who voted there was a 55% voted yes and 45% voted no. Will be interesting to see how close that is to the actual vote. I'm betting a 95% majority in favour. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,851 Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 On 2016/03/24 at 11:53 AM, The Louden Tavern said: Can you tell me what their reasons were and why they were all completely wrong? Was it not that they disagreed with your opinion? RM Why the nasty add on in the edit? You really need to think about your posts as some are antagonistic at best and downright rude in many cases . IMO of course. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,851 Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 On 2016/03/24 at 0:07 PM, rbr said: Varied reasons , 1 guy is a seaon ticket holder who thought he was automatically now a member of club1872 , he has never joined either the RST not RF , this guy travels home and away religiously but has no interest in the politics of fan ownership , he was pretty pissed when I explained he wasnt a member ., never bothered with the proposal and started quoting what ex players had been saying in the press Next voted Yes because Gough is his hero , never read the proposals , pays a £5 to RF every month. Next guy felt swayed by the wording of the question and didnt realise that this meant disbanding both groups to form a new one , again didnt read the proposal , also a season ticket holder whom didnt think he was getting anything . Lastly was another mate , lifetime member of the RST who had become completly fed up with the way the RST had been heading and in his words " fancied a change " Its only my opinion but I didnt see anything in their thinking to agree with their voting in that way , others will disagree . "Follow my leader (or hero worship)" is always going to win votes. A cynical person would say that's why he (RG) is there and maybe why TLT is fighting so hard for him? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,666 Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 54 minutes ago, Big Al II said: Hi All Yes 10 No 13 Voted No as per majority. Note that out of everyone who voted there was a 55% voted yes and 45% voted no. Will be interesting to see how close that is to the actual vote. I'm betting a 95% majority in favour. I reckon it would be around 97 or 98% in favour sadly Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 1 hour ago, Big Al II said: Hi All Yes 10 No 13 Voted No as per majority. Note that out of everyone who voted there was a 55% voted yes and 45% voted no. Will be interesting to see how close that is to the actual vote. I'm betting a 95% majority in favour. i'll go with 98.7% in favour. EDIT: and a turnout of no more than 4k voters. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
siddiqi_drinker 14,635 Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 1 hour ago, Big Al II said: Hi All Yes 10 No 13 Voted No as per majority. Note that out of everyone who voted there was a 55% voted yes and 45% voted no. Will be interesting to see how close that is to the actual vote. I'm betting a 95% majority in favour. Sounds like the Zimbabwean elections. Wonder who will be the new Robert? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.