Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Skyson1872

FIFA 17 Ratings

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Dan Deacon said:

Sounds like he is the type of player when you go round their house, they use an official controller and hand you a pure shanner with terrible buttons 

:lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

6 minutes ago, Scott1872 said:

Also seen it still said it's not the full stadium list yet, still hoping for ibrox.

Nou Camp is PES this year since Barca are their official partners. Won't be seeing the CL licence in FIFA for a few more years at least as Konami just renewed with them for 3/4 seasons.

There isn't going to be an Ibrox, it's already been rubbished as has the taigs.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, BF2 said:

So frustrating that they include pishy wee grounds like Swansea's and Bournemouth's but won't include Ibrox.

It's annoying but that's because of the official partnership with the EPL and that being the most popular league in the land.

No one bar us (a miniscule total of FIFA gamers) touches the Scottish leagues/teams so you can understand why they wouldn't put our stadiums in. There is just no demand for it at all.

The way EA are going they will be looking to do the same with Spain, Germany, Italy and France with what they have done with the Premiership so it's not on the cards at all.

Best chance is a stadium editor or playing on a PC with modding capabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Godfather said:

34/35 year old Zlatan highest rated in EPL at OVR 90 :lol:

FIFA ratings are a complete embarrassment.

He's still putting in the same standard of performances that he was 5 years ago, coming off the back of an extremely successful season last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, lidorfc said:

He's still putting in the same standard of performances that he was 5 years ago, coming off the back of an extremely successful season last year.

Nah, he's scored goals this season but his all round game has been meh.

I'm not having him as a 90 rated player, it's laughable.

Then again FIFA are fucking retards they have the Chelsea keeper at 87.

The ratings are a joke if you actually go and look at them

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Godfather said:

Nah, he's scored goals this season but his all round game has been meh. It's because he moved to United.

I'm not having him as a 90 rated player, it's laughable.

Then again FIFA are fucking retards they have the Chelsea keeper at 87 ahead of De Gea.

The ratings are a joke if you actually go and look at them

 

He's played a handful of games this season. He might be 34/35 but he's still one of the best strikers in the world, 90 is a bit over powered but not  by much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, The Godfather said:

It's annoying but that's because of the official partnership with the EPL and that being the most popular league in the land.

No one bar us (a miniscule total of FIFA gamers) touches the Scottish leagues/teams so you can understand why they wouldn't put our stadiums in. There is just no demand for it at all.

The way EA are going they will be looking to do the same with Spain, Germany, Italy and France with what they have done with the Premiership so it's not on the cards at all.

Best chance is a stadium editor or playing on a PC with modding capabilities.

I understand that it's the most popular league in the world, but at the same time the majority of FIFA players outside the UK will only be interested in playing with the big teams - Utd, City, Chelsea, Arsenal etc.  Do those folk really care if Hull and Burnley's grounds are in the game?  Even when teams are relegated to the Championship they keep their stadiums in it.

You're right about FIFA's official partnership with the EPL and they will focus all their attention on that, but IMO they should just include the biggest and best stadiums in the world in the game.  Surely there are a bigger percentage of FIFA players who are Rangers fans than there are who support the likes of Bournemouth and Hull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, BF2 said:

I understand that it's the most popular league in the world, but at the same time the majority of FIFA players outside the UK will only be interested in playing with the big teams - Utd, City, Chelsea, Arsenal etc.  Do those folk really care if Hull and Burnley's grounds are in the game?  Even when teams are relegated to the Championship they keep their stadiums in it.

You're right about FIFA's official partnership with the EPL and they will focus all their attention on that, but IMO they should just include the biggest and best stadiums in the world in the game.  Surely there are a bigger percentage of FIFA players who are Rangers fans than there are who support the likes of Bournemouth and Hull.

On the stadiums for Championship teams they have already taken the time to create the stadiums in the first place so why take out content that’s already there? That would just be daft no?

Career mode (EPL) is one of the most played modes on FIFA other than UT so that’s why it gets the treatment it does and given it’s the most popular league in the world people who play career mode will undoubtedly go for that one given its popularity, authenticity ect.

 

It’s got nothing to do with how many Hull supporters compared to Rangers supporters….It’s league that is the drawing force behind FIFA not the English sides in it. In gaming figures hardly any cunt plays as Rangers or Celtic…or goes near the Scottish leagues so why are they going to include stadiums for teams hardly anyone is using? You can’t look at this as a Rangers fan but instead a gamer and realise 99% of FIFA players don’t touch our sides and the league we are in unlike the EPL, La Liga and so on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, The Godfather said:

On the stadiums for Championship teams they have already taken the time to create the stadiums in the first place so why take out content that’s already there? That would just be daft no?

Career mode (EPL) is one of the most played modes on FIFA other than UT so that’s why it gets the treatment it does and given it’s the most popular league in the world people who play career mode will undoubtedly go for that one given its popularity, authenticity ect.

 

It’s got nothing to do with how many Hull supporters compared to Rangers supporters….It’s league that is the drawing force behind FIFA not the English sides in it. In gaming figures hardly any cunt plays as Rangers or Celtic…or goes near the Scottish leagues so why are they going to include stadiums for teams hardly anyone is using? You can’t look at this as a Rangers fan but instead a gamer and realise 99% of FIFA players don’t touch our sides and the league we are in unlike the EPL, La Liga and so on.

But they also include grounds from the Argentinian and American leagues, who's interested in playing in them?  Pretty sure they also had a ground from the Saudi Arabian league in '16.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BF2 said:

But they also include grounds from the Argentinian and American leagues, who's interested in playing in them?  Pretty sure they also had a ground from the Saudi Arabian league in '16.

MLS is a far more popular and supported league than the Scottish Premiership these days. The rise in the MLS and American soccer fans (plus the sheer population of gamers in the US) will be the reason for that.

I could go on all day but the fact is there is no demand for putting Ibrox or the taigs stadium in FIFA. You can shout till you are blue in the face but our league is dog shit thus meaning no one wants to use or sides other than us

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, The Godfather said:

MLS is a far more popular and supported league than the Scottish Premiership these days. The rise in the MLS and American soccer fans (plus the sheer population of gamers in the US) will be the reason for that.

I could go on all day but the fact is there is no demand for putting Ibrox or the taigs stadium in FIFA. You can shout till you are blue in the face but our league is dog shit thus meaning no one wants to use or sides other than us

 

Unfortunately, this is the truth. Would be good to get us in the "rest of the world" section, rather than adding the league. Historically big clubs should have a place there..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, johanhentze said:

Unfortunately, this is the truth. Would be good to get us in the "rest of the world" section, rather than adding the league. Historically big clubs should have a place there..

We are in the game.. as is the entire SPL.

They were talking about Scottish stadiums being in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Iakona said:

We are in the game.. as is the entire SPL.

They were talking about Scottish stadiums being in the game.

Sorry! Still not recovered from last night.. a long day and good result for us against Hungary :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, lidorfc said:

He's still putting in the same standard of performances that he was 5 years ago, coming off the back of an extremely successful season last year.

5 hours ago, The Godfather said:

Nah, he's scored goals this season but his all round game has been meh.

I'm not having him as a 90 rated player, it's laughable.

There used to be a hidden stat called "International Reputation", which explained things like Reus having better stats than Hazard but being rated lower overall. I'm not sure if they still do it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_3925732987&feature=iv&src_vid=UvyJvokIoss&v=KbYGuBqqiZM

kanjo likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, OhW said:

There used to be a hidden stat called "International Reputation", which explained things like Reus having better stats than Hazard but being rated lower overall. I'm not sure if they still do it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_3925732987&feature=iv&src_vid=UvyJvokIoss&v=KbYGuBqqiZM

They do still use it I'm sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, OhW said:

There used to be a hidden stat called "International Reputation", which explained things like Reus having better stats than Hazard but being rated lower overall. I'm not sure if they still do it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_3925732987&feature=iv&src_vid=UvyJvokIoss&v=KbYGuBqqiZM

never knew this.  Very interesting.

OhW likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...