Hutchy WATP 462 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 For some reason that last line puts a bit of fear in me, its the bbc remember. If it is something to do with us I'm confident we dealt with it the same way as the other guy, sacked and reported to the polis. Not like they scumbag bastards purposely letting a rabid bheast BACK into the fold to abuse again. Fuckin sickens me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Nosed Babe 20,355 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 1 Hibs should have told Rangers about Neeley 2 We called the cops as I believe Souness and Sir Walter 3 Nothing surprises me about that vile club from the East End. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,010 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 I notice they are still denying it had anything to do with the club and no one knew, except Jock did know, he threw him out, how could Jock throw someone out of an organisation that had nothing to do with the club ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,461 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 hate how on BBC sportsound they said we reported him to the police but when the police where contracted with a FOI request no log of the report could be found basically try to cast doubt on if we reported the sick scum bastard Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWR1979 1,953 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 12 minutes ago, KingKirk said: hate how on BBC sportsound they said we reported him to the police but when the police where contracted with a FOI request no log of the report could be found basically try to cast doubt on if we reported the sick scum bastard You think that's bad they are saying on the BBC website that neeley abused boys inside Ibrox. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 The issue has never, ever been about the abuse itself. These horrible bastards exist in every walk of life. The issue is 100% their cover up of it and their decision to bring the cunt back after Jock died. There's been money involved here to keep it quiet and its blatant as the nose on everyones face. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,461 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 pin pulled Brenda quick sign that contract bad news is coming Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle 53,253 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 These stories are horrific Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
left winger 13,977 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 11 hours ago, Getstiffed said: The issue has never, ever been about the abuse itself. These horrible bastards exist in every walk of life. The issue is 100% their cover up of it and their decision to bring the cunt back after Jock died. There's been money involved here to keep it quiet and its blatant as the nose on everyones face. I think those abused might disagree about your first sentence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 28 minutes ago, left winger said: I think those abused might disagree about your first sentence. Of course and they would if they take it out of context. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
left winger 13,977 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, Getstiffed said: Of course and they would if they take it out of context. you stated child abuse wasn't the issue, the non-reporting is. Your context is playing down the abuse, probably because that cunt Neely was at Ibrox, yet focusing on the non-reporting of it, which didn't happen at Ibrox. Your context appears to be that condemning the mhanks and having them 'brought to justice' is more important than the victims. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 9 minutes ago, left winger said: you stated child abuse wasn't the issue, the non-reporting is. Your context is playing down the abuse, probably because that cunt Neely was at Ibrox, yet focusing on the non-reporting of it, which didn't happen at Ibrox. Your context appears to be that condemning the mhanks and having them 'brought to justice' is more important than the victims. Nah my context was and still is that they cunts are trying to act like we've claimed all these years that the abuse is what sets their situation apart. Its not. These cunts exist everywhere, in every demographic and probably most major institutions that have access to children in one way or another. So their attempts at "so wit you did it too" is total horsehite considering it was the covering up of the crimes we took issue with. Had Torbett not been brought to justice I don't doubt for one second it would be front and centre. The context is quite clear unless A. you hadn't read the conversation as it was unfolding prior to my post and/or B. you're looking for anything to have a go at me specifically. Given all that do me a favour and don't put words like that in my mouth ever again. Now kindly fuck right off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
left winger 13,977 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, Getstiffed said: Nah my context was and still is that they cunts are trying to act like we've claimed all these years that the abuse is what sets their situation apart. Its not. These cunts exist everywhere, in every demographic and probably most major institutions that have access to children in one way or another. So their attempts at "so wit you did it too" is total horsehite considering it was the covering up of the crimes we took issue with. Had Torbett not been brought to justice I don't doubt for one second it would be front and centre. The context is quite clear unless A. you hadn't read the conversation as it was unfolding prior to my post and/or B. you're looking for anything to have a go at me specifically. Given all that do me a favour and don't put words like that in my mouth ever again. Now kindly fuck right off. Words in your mouth? Now you're just making things up. A. I have read the conversation. B. Yes, I am posting to you specifically, and taking an issue with what you have said. That's what happens on forums, such as these. If you take that as me having a go at you, thats up to you. 'It was the covering up of the crimes we took issue with'. Yes we did, but also with the abuse, surely? The first post I replied to of yours, clearly played that down. If you posted something you didn't mean to, or don't believe, fair enough. But it was your words, not mine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Just now, left winger said: Words in your mouth? Now you're just making things up. A. I have read the conversation. B. Yes, I am posting to you specifically, and taking an issue with what you have said. That's what happens on forums, such as these. If you take that as me having a go at you, thats up to you. 'It was the covering up of the crimes we took issue with'. Yes we did, but also with the abuse, surely? The first post I replied to of yours, clearly played that down. If you posted something you didn't mean to, or don't believe, fair enough. But it was your words, not mine. No we never took issue with it because those involved were charged and convicted. There was a cover up that has went unpunished for nearly 30 years. The horrors are now trying to create parity between our situation with Neely and theirs with Torbett. There is no parity as we informed the police and sacked the cunt. Are you honestly claiming that every post on the subject has to start with "The abuse itself is the main issue...." and then make whatever point is being made? If I felt I had to point out that the abuse was the worse than the cover up then its everyone else that has the problem not me because I think it goes without saying. What a desperate desperate white knight you are. You've made a cunt of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Copland bear 7,966 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Why has it took this long should be the question as we have all know about Torbett for years . Hugh Britt they tried to make look a foolish bitter old man at the court case but he was telling the truth and it's all down on record at Torbett's original trail . Or will these notes disappear like the Celtic board meeting minutes that discussed Torbett the first time around. Lawell and Petrie should both be suspended from the SFA until all this is over as the SFA can't have members from clubs on their board who knowly coheres up sex abuse as they xlubs must be punished severely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMB 14,167 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Celtic Park was home to child porn for a period lasting decades. An employee of the Celtic View hid it there for 20 years. How can this happen and no one else knows about it sooner? If this was any other British stadium imagine the outrage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
linfield1690 4,249 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Strip the bastards of titles Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 8 minutes ago, THE_MIGHTY_BEARS said: An employee of the Celtic View hid it there for 20 years. How can this happen and no one else knows about it sooner? If this was any other British stadium imaging the outrage. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/3505864.stm John Cullen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 27 minutes ago, linfield1690 said: Strip the bastards of titles They defo recieved money from Torbetts family to keep it quiet. The money went directly into the club and was presumably used to pay players and staff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 12 minutes ago, Getstiffed said: They defo recieved money from Torbetts family to keep it quiet. The money went directly into the club and was presumably used to pay players and staff. Was it Jack McGinn and Kevin Kelly, former chairman and board member, who continued to work for Torbett's company, even after his conviction? Yet, they claim "separate entity"? What a pathetic attempt to shirk responsibility, and possibly more. Mind you, there was one institution that they were not accusing of being a separate entity from that they were referring to, which was unusual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,461 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 The last bit of the programme last night said alot to me scum fc have asked any other potential victims to come and speak to the club.. Goes completely against what's been happening uk wide damage limitation is the aim by saying that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 29 minutes ago, OlegKuznetsov said: Was it Jack McGinn and Kevin Kelly, former chairman and board member, who continued to work for Torbett's company, even after his conviction? Yet, they claim "separate entity"? What a pathetic attempt to shirk responsibility, and possibly more. Mind you, there was one institution that they were not accusing of being a separate entity from that they were referring to, which was unusual. The Kelly's are up to their necks in it as far as I'm concerned Oleg. Highlighting the cover up is extremely important at this point because It was allowed to carry on once Jock died. Those who engaged in the acts of abuse are not the only guilty parties here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 17 minutes ago, Getstiffed said: The Kelly's are up to their necks in it as far as I'm concerned Oleg. Highlighting the cover up is extremely important at this point because It was allowed to carry on once Jock died. Those who engaged in the acts of abuse are not the only guilty parties here. Quite simply, they need to be shut down. I think that now would be a good time to start a petition, demanding that they be shut down for knowingly sheltering at least one pervert and possibly a whole paedophile ring. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 1 minute ago, OlegKuznetsov said: Quite simply, they need to be shut down. I think that now would be a good time to start a petition, demanding that they be shut down for knowingly sheltering at least one pervert and possibly a whole paedophile ring. At the very least they should be made to pay reparations to every person directly affected by their actions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonok 1,245 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Out and about today and what Im hearing from the celtic support is deflect and deny, they are part of the problem, child abuse enablers one and all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.