Jump to content

Confusion Over Management Team's Future


spanther22

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

I must admit, it does make me chuckle to think that for weeks and weeks we've speculated that the board had x, y or z lined up to replace Warburton and no one batted an eyelid, but when Warburton seemingly lines up another job cunts want him hung :lol: 

 
 

Which has not even been proved yet.,

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bornabear said:

It is going to be a few hard years mate.

King is a conman and will not be touched by anyone within the business world, that is a BIG problem for us

Certainly looks like your right about King, what chance have we got when our own board members can't even get on with him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PRW. said:

Even though its the same thing he done when Fulham came knocking? 

Agents acting on 3 of the clients behalf, without their client knowing. :lol: 

Havent got through all this yet (just found out about all this this morning). But do we know for sure that the agent was working on behalf of all three? I cant imagine anyone resigning verbally without having another concrete written job offer. And I cant imagine a competent agent offering three clients resignation verbally and through him by mistake or without having a concrete job offer for all three. Something stinks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Rangers Lady said:

 

 

Dunny would be the man to corroborate or dismiss the rumours,

Why no phone him instead of Mark Dingwall, oh aye, the egotistical make sure all the mhedia outlets have them on speed dial  

Dunny is as decent as there is, be good to get his take on it

@Dunny_01

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Dunny_01 said:

ive heard member of board had an arguement on tuesday with warburton regarding the team

also it could possibly be rangers have found out warburton n co have signed for nottingham forest and not happy

:tu:  Thank You ,  Also tips McLiesh as caretaker manager 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dlydon81 said:

I'm not so confident - The fact the official announcement of the resignation sets out a sequence of events including a change of mind by warbs says to me that this is not clear cut.  If it was clear cut, Rangers would simply have said one line that they have accepted resignation letter and we wish them well.

Also an employment lawyer will be having heart failure at the part saying we are not where we would want to be at the moment which hints that the board wanted to oust them for performance ignoring the 'resignation'

the key is whether they have a letter of resignation.  I've never had an employment contract that didn't require resignation in writing and so a conversation with an agent on Wednesday won't count for anything in court.

 

 

Doesn't Scottish legislation include a verbal agreement as being legally binding? 

I'm hoping it's not going to come to his agents word against the Rangers board with us probably losing out on the basis of unfair dismissal but you'd think surely they would've checked all this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lance1697 said:

Doesn't Scottish legislation include a verbal agreement as being legally binding? 

I'm hoping it's not going to come to his agents word against the Rangers board with us probably losing out on the basis of unfair dismissal but you'd think surely they would've checked all this!

Yes, but proving the exact terms of the agreement is all but impossible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, simplythebest said:

Are you seriously claiming the board completely fabricated them wanting to go to Nottingham Forest then?

My beef with this,if its true,is the story the board actually sat down with MW's agent early this week and were prepared to give him time to cherry pick a nice wee cushy number at Forrest.
As soon as it was mumbled he was thinking of leaving he should have been escorted from the premises double quick time.
Makes you wonder who the biggest snake/snakes were/are.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scottyscott1963 said:

My beef with this,if its true,is the story the board actually sat down with MW's agent early this week and were prepared to give him time to cherry pick a nice wee cushy number at Forrest.
As soon as it was mumbled he was thinking of leaving he should have been escorted from the premises double quick time.
Makes you wonder who the biggest snake/snakes were/are.   

Seems to me they reached an agreement and it was due to be announced after the Morton game 

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Rangers Lady said:

What happened yesterday that you can tell us ?

Who is going to lead us for the remainder of the season ?

I knnow nuthinnnnn im from barcelona!! 

sorry mrs im a fan up stand no a director! lol

if i was betting man i would say mcleish but ive just lost fortune in vegas! 

ps do u work for The Sun? lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 28 April 2024 11:30 Until 13:30
      0  
      St Mirren v Rangers
      The SMiSA Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Football
×
×
  • Create New...