RFCRobertson 11,773 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 You can see here as Imrie has the ball Garner is already starting to swing his leg http://i.imgur.com/gs2zpiI.jpg and again here you can see it further in motion, the ball still at Imries foot with Garner about to make contact with it http://i.imgur.com/nPAMk4w.jpg but as you see here, Imrie has nudged the ball away http://i.imgur.com/d6uLtu8.jpg Garners foot is in full swing and can't back out of it now and now there's only one way it's ending. You can actually see Imrie brace for the impact. as a result, Imrie get's skelp in the arse by Garner http://i.imgur.com/tk9bpG4.jpg So honestly, it's a reckless challenge and in the rule book a reckless challenge is typically a yellow. Going by the checklist for a red Guilty of serious foul play. No I wouldn't say so, Garner clearly makes a play for the ball and imrie puts the ball away. There was intent to kick the ball out but not Imrie. Violent Conduct. Now getting kicked in the arse is by most peoples standards violent, however it's the intent that is key here. If Garner deliberately does it, like jumps up in the air and elbows him after looking to see he was there, then that would be violent conduct. However a mistimed tackle doesn't constitute as that unless it's a very damaging injury that is a result (like a mistimed kick gouging someones eye out) Spits on an opponent. Self explanatory. Denies the opposing team a goal scoring opportunity. Again self explanatory and not applicable. Uses offensive language. Imrie would've gotten red carded for this to be honest lol receivers a second yellow. Self explanatory. So taking all that into account, yellow for me is the correct decision given the circumstances of the kick. There wasn't any intent to harm imrie and Garner was aiming for the ball. Imrie knocking the ball out the way is ultimately what caused it. So what I'm saying is is imrie should've been red cardes for foul language Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escobar 13,676 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 I'm just telling everyone it was a straight red to wind up the tarriers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackrfc95 4,255 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 10 for effort. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk and disorderly. 14,393 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 He was smiling though..... Straight red! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,626 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Foul by Imrie. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottyarf37 963 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Aye shin to the thigh boot to the arse. Imrie makes a meal of it, but that's modern football. Europe, Epl can see it as a red... Garners reputation goes before him so he needs to be clever! Do we need our Striker making rash challanges at the byline? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miller time 4,988 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Was a straight red ffs. Yes he went for the ball but he took him out. Most people go for the ball but if you go in like that then it's dangerous. Imagine it was one of them v us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie1963 2,352 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Very similar incident in Aberdeen game Sutton will be all over it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dlydon81 245 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 It was one of those - If someone did that to one of our players I'd want a red. If it is one of our players doing it to someone else, I try to give them the benefit of the doubt and say yellow. on Saturday I agreed with Walter and Neil who both said red but now I'm not so sure. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeirFleckNRothen 1,789 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Thank fuck the tarriers aren't bright enough to create an equivalent to Kerryfail Meltdown because this would receive 100K re-Tweets. An embarrassing topic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
left winger 14,125 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 It was a red. He got a red. End of. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottyarf37 963 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Take the two reds on the chin......we won 6-0. More amazing that we had 9 on the pitch and no goalie. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCRobertson 11,773 Posted March 6, 2017 Author Share Posted March 6, 2017 12 minutes ago, WeirFleckNRothen said: Thank fuck the tarriers aren't bright enough to create an equivalent to Kerryfail Meltdown because this would receive 100K re-Tweets. An embarrassing topic. The joke you Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCRobertson 11,773 Posted March 6, 2017 Author Share Posted March 6, 2017 13 minutes ago, left winger said: It was a red. He got a red. End of. Did he aye Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyc06 6,915 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 13 minutes ago, left winger said: It was a red. He got a red. End of. It wasn't. He never. End of. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,521 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Fresh air swipe. Only imrie's arse got in the road. Accidental = yellow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastEnclosureBear 2,918 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 13 minutes ago, left winger said: It was a red. He got a red. End of. Did you watch the game? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,521 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 15 minutes ago, left winger said: It was a red. He got a red. End of. Fux sake Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutton2008 646 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Straight Red. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,521 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 32 minutes ago, RFCRobertson said: You can see here as Imrie has the ball Garner is already starting to swing his leg http://i.imgur.com/gs2zpiI.jpg and again here you can see it further in motion, the ball still at Imries foot with Garner about to make contact with it http://i.imgur.com/nPAMk4w.jpg but as you see here, Imrie has nudged the ball away http://i.imgur.com/d6uLtu8.jpg Garners foot is in full swing and can't back out of it now and now there's only one way it's ending. You can actually see Imrie brace for the impact. as a result, Imrie get's skelp in the arse by Garner http://i.imgur.com/tk9bpG4.jpg So honestly, it's a reckless challenge and in the rule book a reckless challenge is typically a yellow. Going by the checklist for a red Guilty of serious foul play. No I wouldn't say so, Garner clearly makes a play for the ball and imrie puts the ball away. There was intent to kick the ball out but not Imrie. Violent Conduct. Now getting kicked in the arse is by most peoples standards violent, however it's the intent that is key here. If Garner deliberately does it, like jumps up in the air and elbows him after looking to see he was there, then that would be violent conduct. However a mistimed tackle doesn't constitute as that unless it's a very damaging injury that is a result (like a mistimed kick gouging someones eye out) Spits on an opponent. Self explanatory. Denies the opposing team a goal scoring opportunity. Again self explanatory and not applicable. Uses offensive language. Imrie would've gotten red carded for this to be honest lol receivers a second yellow. Self explanatory. So taking all that into account, yellow for me is the correct decision given the circumstances of the kick. There wasn't any intent to harm imrie and Garner was aiming for the ball. Imrie knocking the ball out the way is ultimately what caused it. So what I'm saying is is imrie should've been red cardes for foul language Robbo, have you not got studying to do? stop procrastinating and get on with it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCRobertson 11,773 Posted March 6, 2017 Author Share Posted March 6, 2017 Just now, KeyserSoze said: Robbo, have you not got studying to do? stop procrastinating and get on with it. How do you know am in uni right now Also this is what I'm reduced too with match threads the stuff of mere amateurs Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
William McBeath 2,154 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 The Record has a big long winded article criticising the refs performance. Don't remember seeing this any other time a ref has a couple of contentious decisions. No author cited of course. I think Garners was just an old fashioned clumsy challenge that would usually only be a yellow. It's only a big deal because it's us and him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,735 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Op you need your hole, like seriously. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblueal 2,117 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Lol. He arrived late and volleyed a guy up the arse. It was a red. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,521 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 You said you are Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.