Gazza or laudrup

[stewaj3 1,446]

I picked gazza as the guy had remarkable technical ability. Different positions and both were great, but i just think at his peak he could play for anyone. 

Laudrup occasionally struggled to adapt... Thankfully he was immense for us

[Getstiffed 8,863]

Based on nothing but footballing ability, Gazza.

And its not even a hard decision tbh.

[MisterBlueSky 259]

No need to have this poll when it's a tough decision.

Both played for us and were amazing. Leave it at that.

[stewaj3 1,446]

2 minutes ago, Getstiffed said:

Based on nothing but footballing ability, Gazza.

And its not even a hard decision tbh.

Ooft, not a hard decision, laudrup for us could drift past players for fun. 

I also said gazza but i really don't think its an easy choice... 

[ElBufalo20 7,890]

Who cares? We had 2 genuine world class players playing for us at the same time.

lets just enjoy it.

[hammer93 15,057]

Gazza for me, I loved laudrup but Gazza just had an aura about him......so talented with the ball at his feet.....Paul Gascoigne in the right frame of mind was a world class footballer and so many on here had the pleasure of watching him live.

[jackrfc95 4,255]

Like choosing between fanny and tits.

I love both.

[stewaj3 1,446]

2 minutes ago, MisterBlueSky said:

No need to have this poll when it's a tough decision.

Both played for us and were amazing. Leave it at that.

Aye alright its a bit of fun... To wee who folk would pick... Id put a neither up, but if i don't like folk who enjoy splinters up their.... 

[Getstiffed 8,863]

5 minutes ago, stewaj3 said:

Ooft, not a hard decision, laudrup for us could drift past players for fun. 

I also said gazza but i really don't think its an easy choice... 

Picking Gazza over Laudrup and feeling that based purely on ability its not a hard decision is in no way a slight on Laudrup.

[slimjim1690 4,534]

In the next 20 /30 yrs the generation that watched these two will speak of them with the same reverence that my generation spoke of Baxter, no mean feat.

[KeyserSoze 14,531]

Fuck your poll rules 

Both

[BigAmo'sThighs 848]

Laudrup because of his devilish good looks 

[Inigo 32,526]

Horrible decision to have to make, but if I go on how much enjoyment was brought to me at the time and how much they did for the team, then it's Laudrup for me.

Laudrup was a little more consistently entertaining to watch IMO and was the difference more often for us.

[Coplandbear11 1,087]

Laudrup for me. The guy was my idol growing up for those 4 years. Absolutely Majestic with a ball at his feet. Truly world class talent at Rangers in both him and Gascoigne. 

[dougie76 15,359]

Laudrup for me because he didn't pee on cunts at training?

But overall Gazza had the most natural ability.

[Ivybank 4,580]

Loved gazza but has to be laudrup

[harlands plater 16,974]

Laudrup every time. You knew what you were going to get every game, Gazza could be unbelievable and entertaining but sometimes the red mist came down and he could be a liability although I must admit the good times far outweighed the bad.

So hard to believe now we had them both at the same time.

[cushynumber 25,178]

 laudrup was the steadier of the two and the one you could reply on a bit more. I would like to have managed laudrup. I am not sure I would have liked to have managed Gazza.

However, I do believe that gazzas  tartan suit was a mark of genius. He actually walked past me in glasgow airport at about 7 am in that suit.

[don logan 8,062]

Laudrup every time. Better player, better professional and a better man.

[Don81 2,837]

9 minutes ago, dougie76 said:

Laudrup for me because he didn't pee on cunts at training?

Probably why Gazza just edges it for me tbh. Both outstanding talents but Gazza's craziness off the park meant I loved him just that little bit more.

[dougie76 15,359]

3 minutes ago, dougal72 said:

Probably why Gazza just edges it for me tbh. Both outstanding talents but Gazza's craziness off the park meant I loved him just that little bit more.

Naw mate Gazza as a player is up there with the best but as a human being he is a arsehole let's be honest.

[BearInTheWood 220]

Absolutely adored both but Laudrup just edges it for me.

Had the total privilege watching these guys play for us at many grounds as a youngster and Laudrup sticks in my mind just that bit more.

Legends! 

[Alec87 331]

33 minutes ago, harlands plater said:

Laudrup every time. You knew what you were going to get every game, Gazza could be unbelievable and entertaining but sometimes the red mist came down and he could be a liability although I must admit the good times far outweighed the bad.

So hard to believe now we had them both at the same time.

Have you wiped Laudrup's final season from your memory ?

For that reason I pick Gazza

[Bearsden bear 2,376]

Laudrup for me,  as he always performed and was such a cool guy - great ambassador for club.

Gazza was at times brilliant but not that consistent & a bit of a nutter too.

Both amazing players that we were lucky to have with us.

 

[legalbeagle 3,734]

Laudrup was a better player, a more consistent player and overall a far better ambassador for the club.