Tenerife Bear 1,748 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 This is his way of saying we are years from winning the title. They needed stopped at the first time of asking. Next season will be the 2nd, maybe even 3rd if we hadn't ballsed up the Championship when Hearts won it. This year we really have to seriously make them work for anything they win. It's all on us. They ain't world beaters. We do our business and our job right, we can stop them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted E Bayer 484 Posted June 24, 2017 Author Share Posted June 24, 2017 23 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: Off ye fuck. Whit? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 He's absolutely spot on. And he's good at mind games. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueofblood 158 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 3 minutes ago, Bears r us said: He really should be keeping that opinion to himself IMO. IMO he's entitled to say what he has said. Remember who was at the centre of and leading us to get fucked out of the top division. The mhanks knew fine well that us not being there would give them a clean sweep, it's actually fkn embarrassing that the mhanks only won one treble considering their fkn enormous spending power compared to the rest of the competition. As for this invincibles shite too, weren't too invincible against the imps (most embarrassing result in Europe ever for a Scottish team) or the heaviest European result the mhanks have ever had against Barcelaone. So let's not get on the side of journalists and all the rhabids out there. Fkn good on Dave King, say it how most of us see it and how we talk about it among friends. 2 titles and 4 tainted as fuck. Remember at this point we have still not been proven guilty of anything but the cabal and kangaroo court had us guilty and were trying to kill us, never ever forget that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siam69 26,874 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 He's right in what he says here - And King said: “My response to ten-in-a-row is this — Celtic have got two-in-a-row. They would need to win another eight to get to ten. Do I think there’s a chance they could win another eight before we win the league title? No. “Celtic have six league titles but the concept of nine-in-a-row is a competition between Rangers and Celtic. “If Rangers went into the English Premier League and Celtic stayed behind in Scotland and won 20 league titles there would be no point saying to Rangers fans they had won 20-in-a-row because it’s irrelevant if Rangers are not there. “Rangers were removed from the top league for four years. Celtic have the titles but they don’t have nine-in-a-row against Rangers — it only recommenced this season. As far as Rangers are concerned Celtic don’t have six-in-a-row, they’ve got two. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barasa 802 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 1 minute ago, 55Bear said: Wouldn't cling to that claim. A title is a title regardless of if we're there or not. If they got shunned down the league's would we hold our hands up and admit a hollow victory? Doubt it. Honestly? I wouldn't even be bothered to watch except for the champions league. Save money by presenting the title at the draw. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,457 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 If they get ten, they've got ten fucking hell, doesn't matter if we were there or no. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 If Lawell came out with something like this, which he often does, we'd be spewing. We've been lacking this sort of thing for years. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim beam 2,188 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 23 minutes ago, there'sonlyoneamoruso said: Yup. STFU Dave! Why should he? He isn't talking shite the taigs have had a straight run at it someone needs to remind them that with us not present they're titles are tainted . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barasa 802 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 They've got 6................. & 4 asterisks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Gives King an excuse to halt their 9 in a row over more seasons than their actual nine in a row - eg not spend his money but simply using ticket money which has accumulated over a longer time in the hope that will be enough. He's basically saying we should accept we have 7 seasons to stop their run instead of 3, and of course a lot of our... less intellectually capable fans will lap it up like good little doggies. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim beam 2,188 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Just now, Jack The Flipper said: Gives King an excuse to halt their 9 in a row over more seasons than their actual nine in a row - eg not spend his money but simply using ticket money which has accumulated over a longer time in the hope that will be enough. He's basically saying we should accept we have 7 seasons to stop their run instead of 3, and of course a lot of our... less intellectually capable fans will lap it up like good little doggies. Fuck off ya cock Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 1 minute ago, jim beam said: Why should he? He isn't talking shite the taigs have had a straight run at it someone needs to remind them that with us not present they're titles are tainted . This is it. They need to stop believing their own hype and so does the rest of Scotland. King's just chipping away at their superiority complex, it needs done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barasa 802 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Just now, Jack The Flipper said: Gives King an excuse to halt their 9 in a row over more seasons than their actual nine in a row - eg not spend his money but simply using ticket money which has accumulated over a longer time in the hope that will be enough. He's basically saying we should accept we have 7 seasons to stop their run instead of 3, and of course a lot of our... less intellectually capable fans will lap it up like good little doggies. Don't think that's what this is about. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 1 minute ago, Jack The Flipper said: Gives King an excuse to halt their 9 in a row over more seasons than their actual nine in a row - eg not spend his money but simply using ticket money which has accumulated over a longer time in the hope that will be enough. He's basically saying we should accept we have 7 seasons to stop their run instead of 3, and of course a lot of our... less intellectually capable fans will lap it up like good little doggies. Bollocks. He's diminishing their achievements and winding them up in the process. Both of which should be in a Rangers chairman's job description. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,631 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 1 minute ago, Jack The Flipper said: Gives King an excuse to halt their 9 in a row over more seasons than their actual nine in a row - eg not spend his money but simply using ticket money which has accumulated over a longer time in the hope that will be enough. He's basically saying we should accept we have 7 seasons to stop their run instead of 3, and of course a lot of our... less intellectually capable fans will lap it up like good little doggies. We have 4 years to stop 10IAR King and the board know this ffs... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Just now, KingKirk said: We have 4 years to stop 10IAR King and the board know this ffs... I want 9 in a row stopped, not 10 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamess 3,422 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Its all about money into the club to put a league winning team on the field. King and all of us need to keep the pounds rolling in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
there'sonlyoneamoruso 1,724 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 5 minutes ago, jim beam said: Why should he? He isn't talking shite the taigs have had a straight run at it someone needs to remind them that with us not present they're titles are tainted . Because he is putting undue pressure on us. The 'Going for 55' stuff was the same last year. Just let the team play without the sideshow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,791 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 7 minutes ago, Blueofblood said: IMO he's entitled to say what he has said. Remember who was at the centre of and leading us to get fucked out of the top division. The mhanks knew fine well that us not being there would give them a clean sweep, it's actually fkn embarrassing that the mhanks only won one treble considering their fkn enormous spending power compared to the rest of the competition. As for this invincibles shite too, weren't too invincible against the imps (most embarrassing result in Europe ever for a Scottish team) or the heaviest European result the mhanks have ever had against Barcelaone. So let's not get on the side of journalists and all the rhabids out there. Fkn good on Dave King, say it how most of us see it and how we talk about it among friends. 2 titles and 4 tainted as fuck. Remember at this point we have still not been proven guilty of anything but the cabal and kangaroo court had us guilty and were trying to kill us, never ever forget that. It is all about opinions mate and mine is that while he has a point the only way to stop 10 in a row is to win number 55 asap. We all know they are not normal titles but unfortunately the record books will only show the winners and my approach would be to make sure we stop them getting anymore and then say what he has reported to have said. Only my opinion of course. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,137 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Making statements like that are all very well and appeal to the Bears but he'll be crucified in the taig ridden press. We should be doing our talking on the park, I suppose he'll go and hide in SA if it all goes tits up again this season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
William McBeath 2,154 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 8 minutes ago, 55Bear said: Wouldn't cling to that claim. A title is a title regardless of if we're there or not. If they got shunned down the league's would we hold our hands up and admit a hollow victory? Doubt it. Yup but it's not us and they are shite titles. Not even worth the war ones we don't claim. Fuck them. I've never intended to let any talk about ten in a row without saying something similar. It's just the truth that they are worthless. So fair play to King. Not often we undermine their pish with the obvious truth. Wish we would do it with more of their myths. I've seen their club historian taking digs at us in old firm documentaries. Being quiet has allowed this lot to pump out alsorts of myths and propaganda. This title crap is just the latest shite from them. Had to laugh at the invincibles claim. No other club could come up with that for such a shite treble. Especially after being beat by Red Imps and not winning a game in the European group stages. Nothing they say or claim is ever straightforward. Always embellished to fuck. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,631 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Just now, Jack The Flipper said: I want 9 in a row stopped, not 10 Our aim is to attempt to win the league every season.... However the bigger picture is to stop 10IAR we have 4 yrs to get ourselves to top spot and I expect it to happen tbh Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weehank 41 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 3 minutes ago, Jack The Flipper said: I want 9 in a row stopped, not 10 I want 7 (3) stopped Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanMK 4,670 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 King has got tarrier trolling down to an absolute T. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.